GHSA-q78c-5jjq-57g8: SSRF
---
- Ecosystem: Maven - Affected package: org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-server-common (push-notification delivery) - Affected versions: <= 1.2.0.Final (and 1.2.1.Final-SNAPSHOT on main prior to the fix) - Patched version: (the release that carries the fix) - CWE: CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery) - Severity: High - CVSS v3.1: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N (5.8, Moderate)
---
Summary
An unauthenticated attacker can coerce the a2a-java server into issuing HTTP requests to arbitrary internal and cloud-metadata endpoints from the server's own network position — a Server-Side Request Forgery reachable in the default deployment with no credentials, no user interaction, and a single request. The behaviour is the shipped default, not a misconfiguration.
Details
BasePushNotificationSender (in server-common) POSTs task data to the URL stored on a task's TaskPushNotificationConfig with no validation of the destination: no block on loopback, RFC1918, link-local (169.254.0.0/16, including the 169.254.169.254 metadata address), unique-local, unspecified, or multicast ranges; no scheme restriction; and no bound on redirects. InMemoryPushNotificationConfigStore.setInfo stores the URL verbatim and onCreateTaskPushNotificationConfig does not check it either.
Both shipped HTTP clients follow redirects (JdkA2AHttpClient → followRedirects(NORMAL), VertxA2AHttpClient → setFollowRedirects(true)), so a creation-time URL allowlist is bypassable: an attacker webhook answers 302 Location: http://169.254.169.254/... and the client follows it. A hostname check is likewise defeated by DNS rebinding. A correct guard must validate the resolved IP of every hop at connection time, not the URL string.
Exploitation
Demonstrated end-to-end against a running server (default wiring, unauthenticated caller):
- Arbitrary internal reachability. The attacker picks the destination and the server issues the request from inside the trust boundary. Delivery to loopback and to a real RFC1918 LAN address was exercised at runtime; because the code applies no destination filtering of any kind, the same path reaches link-local / metadata (169.254.169.254) and other internal ranges wherever network routing permits. - Allowlist + method bypass via redirect. A 302 from the attacker's webhook reaches destinations a creation-time allowlist would block, and a 302 on a POST is followed as a GET — so GET-only endpoints such as the IMDS credentials path are reachable even though the sender only issues POSTs. This is why a URL allowlist is not a sufficient fix; the guard must validate the resolved IP of every redirect hop. - Data push into internal services. On direct (non-redirected) delivery, each request carries the task payload in the body, so internal services that ingest POST data receive attacker-influenced content (basis for I:L). On a redirected request the body is dropped in the POST→GET conversion, so the body-push and the redirect-reach are separate capabilities, not simultaneous on one request.
The sender discards the fetched response and exposes no caller-visible difference between a successful and a failed delivery (both paths return without surfacing status or body), so the base case reads back nothing — confidentiality is scored C:N. Read-back is limited, reach is not: the attacker still drives fully controlled requests to metadata and internal services and writes data into them.
PoC
Against a running server with push notifications enabled (JSON-RPC transport), using only the real production classes wired the default way:
1. Start a local listener standing in for an internal target (no real metadata service is touched). 2. Send one SendMessage that starts a long-running task, with the push config inlined and its url set to http://<internal-target>/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/. Use returnImmediately: true, header A2A-Version: 1.0, and role ROLEUSER. The URL is stored verbatim. (Equivalent via CreateTaskPushNotificationConfig on an existing task.) 3. As the task emits state/artifact updates, the sender POSTs each one to the stored URL, from the server's own network position:
POST /latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/ HTTP/1.1 Host: 169.254.169.254 Content-Type: application/json
{"artifactUpdate":{"taskId":"...","artifact":{"parts":[{"text":"Progress update 1/20"}]}, ...}}
One SendMessage produced multiple server-side POSTs to the attacker-chosen internal path. Verified on main (commit 72d220c, JDK 21) and unchanged on 1.2.0.Final.
Remediation
Validate the resolved IP of the target and of every redirect hop before connecting: reject loopback / RFC1918 / link-local / metadata / unique-local / unspecified / multicast; restrict the scheme to http/https; cap redirects; and resolve-and-pin to defeat DNS rebinding. Enable by default, with a documented opt-out for deployments that intentionally target internal webhooks. The Go A2A SDK ships a dial-time resolved-IP guard of this shape by default.
Workaround: until a fixed release, block the host's outbound egress to the metadata endpoint and internal ranges at the network layer.
References
- CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/918.html
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
maven/org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-server-commonto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 1.3.0.Final - Compensating control
Block the host's outbound egress to the metadata endpoint at 169.254.169.254.
- Compensating control
Implement a dial-time destination guard that restricts schemes to http/https, caps redirects, resolves and pins the target IP, validates every redirect hop before connecting, and rejects loopback, RFC1918, link-local (including 169.254.169.254), unique-local, unspecified, and multicast destinations.
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Which deployments should be prioritized for remediation?
Any deployment using org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-server-common for push-notification delivery should be prioritized if it is at version 1.2.0.Final or earlier, or uses 1.2.1.Final-SNAPSHOT from main before the fix. The vulnerable behavior is present in the shipped default deployment and does not depend on a custom configuration.
Does an attacker need an account or user interaction to exploit this?
No. The issue is reachable by an unauthenticated attacker, requires no credentials or user interaction, and can be triggered with a single request.
What destinations can an attacker cause the server to contact?
The server can be induced to issue HTTP requests to arbitrary internal and cloud-metadata endpoints from its own network position. The affected code does not block loopback, RFC1918, link-local addresses including 169.254.169.254, unique-local, unspecified, or multicast ranges, and it has no scheme restriction.
How can we determine whether our deployment is affected?
Check whether the application includes the Maven artifact org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-server-common and uses a version at or below 1.2.0.Final. Also treat builds based on 1.2.1.Final-SNAPSHOT from main as affected if they predate the fix.
What fixed version should we upgrade to?
The provided data does not name a specific patched release. Upgrade to the release that carries the fix rather than remaining on an affected release or a pre-fix 1.2.1.Final-SNAPSHOT build.