GHSA-qg2g-g9w3-m5h8: High severity go/github.com/stacklok/toolhive vulnerability
Summary
A containerized MCP server running with the default network permission profile (insecureallowall: true) can reach host-local services via host.docker.internal. This includes the ToolHive API itself, other ToolHive-managed MCP server proxies, and any other service listening on the host's localhost. Combined with the unauthenticated ToolHive API and MCP proxy endpoints, this enables a compromised or malicious MCP server to perform lateral movement without any container escape.
Severity
High — This bypasses the container isolation model that is ToolHive's core security value proposition.
Reproduction
All tests performed from inside the filesystem MCP container (docker.io/mcp/filesystem:latest), started with default settings via thv run filesystem -- /tmp.
1. Container can reach the ToolHive control plane MCP endpoint
bash $ docker exec <containerid> wget -qO- \ --header="Content-Type: application/json" \ --header="Accept: application/json" \ --post-data='{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"initialize","params":{"protocolVersion":"2025-03-26","capabilities":{},"clientInfo":{"name":"evil-mcp","version":"1.0"}},"id":1}' \ http://host.docker.internal:50444/mcp
Result: Full MCP handshake succeeds: json {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"result":{"protocolVersion":"2025-03-26","capabilities":{"logging":{},"tools":{}},"serverInfo":{"name":"toolhive-mcp","version":"v0.9.3"}}}
2. Container can connect to another MCP server's proxy and call its tools
bash $ docker exec <containerid> wget -qO- \ --header="Content-Type: application/json" \ --header="Accept: application/json" \ --post-data='{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"tools/list","params":{},"id":2}' \ http://host.docker.internal:64965/mcp
Result: Returns the full tool list of the target MCP server (readfile, writefile, editfile, movefile, etc.), and tools can be called:
json {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":3,"result":{"content":[{"text":"Allowed directories:\n/tmp","type":"text"}]}}
3. Container can reach other host services
bash Kubernetes API $ docker exec <containerid> wget -qO- --no-check-certificate https://host.docker.internal:6443/version {"major":"1","minor":"34","gitVersion":"v1.34.1"...}
Ollama LLM API $ docker exec <containerid> wget -qO- http://host.docker.internal:11434/api/tags {"models":[{"name":"kimi-k2:1t-cloud"...}]}
Attack Scenarios
Scenario 1: Malicious MCP server pivots to privileged native MCP tools
Many users run native (non-containerized) MCP servers like Desktop Commander, terminal servers, or custom tools that have executecommand, writefile, or shell capabilities with full host access. These typically listen on localhost ports. A malicious containerized MCP server can:
1. Port-scan host.docker.internal to discover listening services 2. Attempt MCP handshakes on discovered ports 3. Call privileged tools (e.g., executecommand("rm -rf /") or writefile("/etc/crontab", "..."))
This achieves full host compromise without any container escape vulnerability.
Scenario 2: Compromised MCP server manipulates ToolHive itself
Via the unauthenticated ToolHive MCP endpoint on port 50444, a compromised container could potentially:
- List and stop other running MCP servers (denial of service) - Start new MCP servers with attacker-controlled images - Modify configurations
Scenario 3: Data exfiltration via cross-MCP-server access
A low-privilege MCP server (e.g., sequentialthinking with no file mounts) could reach the filesystem server's proxy and call readfile to access files it was never authorized to see.
Scenario 4: LLM model theft / abuse
As demonstrated, the container can reach Ollama's API and could enumerate models, run inference, or exfiltrate model weights from self-hosted LLMs.
Root Causes
1. insecureallowall: true as default — permits outbound connections to any destination including host.docker.internal 2. No authentication on ToolHive API / MCP proxies — any client that can reach the port can interact fully 3. Docker's host.docker.internal DNS — resolves to the host machine, bypassing localhost-only binding assumptions
Suggested Mitigations
Short-term
- Block host.docker.internal and 172.17.0.1 (Docker gateway) in container networking by default, even when insecureallowall is enabled. These should require explicit opt-in. - Add authentication to MCP proxy endpoints — even a shared secret or token per session would prevent cross-container lateral movement.
Medium-term
- Network policy per container — ToolHive already has the permissionprofile infrastructure. Add support for explicit allow-lists rather than just the binary none/all choice. - Isolate container networks — run each MCP server in its own Docker network with no access to the Docker bridge gateway.
Long-term
- Mutual TLS or token-based auth between ToolHive proxy and containers, so even if network access exists, unauthorized MCP calls are rejected. - Audit logging — log all MCP tool calls with source identification so lateral movement attempts are visible.
Environment
- ToolHive v0.9.3 (macOS desktop app, Docker runtime) - Docker Desktop for Mac (host.docker.internal enabled by default) - Tested with docker.io/mcp/filesystem:latest
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
go/github.com/stacklok/toolhiveto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.30.1
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Which deployments are exposed?
ToolHive deployments running containerized MCP servers with the default network permission profile, where insecure_allow_all is true, are exposed. The affected container can reach services bound to the host's localhost through host.docker.internal.
What does an attacker need to exploit this?
An attacker needs control of, or the ability to compromise, an MCP server running in an affected container. No container escape is required, and the ToolHive API and MCP proxy endpoints are described as unauthenticated.
What systems could be reached from an affected container?
The container can reach the ToolHive API, other ToolHive-managed MCP server proxies, and other services listening on the host's localhost. This enables lateral movement from the MCP container to host-local services.
What can be done if patching is not immediately possible?
Do not run untrusted or potentially compromised MCP servers with the default network permission profile that enables insecure_allow_all. Use a network configuration that does not allow the container to access host-local services through host.docker.internal.
How can an administrator check for exposure?
Review MCP server network permissions for use of the default profile with insecure_allow_all enabled. From an affected container, connectivity to ToolHive or other host-local services through host.docker.internal indicates exposure.