GHSA-qx7j-jv8m-fppr: Input Validation
Summary RabbitMQ Java Client's inbound AMQP command assembly accepts a content header declaring a small body and then processes a larger body frame by throwing a raw UnsupportedOperationException from CommandAssembler. A broker peer that the client has connected to can use this malformed frame sequence to fail frame processing and tear down the client connection instead of receiving a clean protocol-level malformed-frame error.
This was discovered based on an existing vulnerability CVE-2017-15699.
Details Inbound frames enter the client through SocketFrameHandler.readFrame, which returns frames parsed from the peer-controlled input stream (src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/SocketFrameHandler.java:197). AMQConnection.MainLoop reads each frame (src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/AMQConnection.java:692) and dispatches non-zero-channel frames to the channel while the connection is open (src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/AMQConnection.java:748 and src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/AMQConnection.java:766). The channel then passes the frame to the current command assembler through AMQChannel.handleFrame and AMQCommand.handleFrame (src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/AMQChannel.java:121, src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/AMQCommand.java:114). When a content-bearing method is followed by a content header, CommandAssembler.consumeHeaderFrame records the header's declared body size in remainingBodyBytes after only checking it against the configured maximum (src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/CommandAssembler.java:126 through src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/CommandAssembler.java:139). The body-frame path subtracts the received payload length from that remaining count before validating that the payload fits (src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/CommandAssembler.java:145 through src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/CommandAssembler.java:149), so a body frame larger than the declared size drives the count negative and reaches the raw UnsupportedOperationException at src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/CommandAssembler.java:150 and src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/CommandAssembler.java:151. AMQConnection catches the resulting throwable in frame processing and performs connection failure handling and final shutdown (src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/AMQConnection.java:695 through src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/AMQConnection.java:705).
PoC poc.zip
bash bash ./poc/run.sh
text Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: %%%%%% FIXME unimplemented
The UnsupportedOperationException: %%%%%% FIXME unimplemented fingerprint is the raw exception thrown at the negative remainingBodyBytes check in CommandAssembler.consumeBodyFrame. This line shows the malformed declared-size/body-size sequence reached the vulnerable assembler path.
Impact The attacker model is a remote AMQP broker peer that the RabbitMQ Java Client application has accepted, including a malicious broker endpoint, a compromised broker, or routing that sends the client to an attacker-controlled peer. The peer needs a non-zero open channel that can receive a content-bearing server-to-client method such as basic.deliver, then sends the method frame, a content header declaring a body below the configured maximum, and a body frame whose payload exceeds that declared size. Under those conditions, the peer can force frame processing to fail with UnsupportedOperationException and close the AMQP connection, producing a client-side denial of service for work depending on that connection; the finding does not indicate memory corruption, data disclosure, or code execution.
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
maven/com.rabbitmq:amqp-clientto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 5.31.0
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is in a position to exploit this issue?
Client applications are exposed when they connect to a broker peer that can send crafted AMQP frames. The issue is in inbound frame handling by the Java client, so the peer providing the connection input is the relevant attacker position.
What does an attacker need to send to trigger the failure?
An attacker needs to send a content header that declares a small body and then follow it with a larger body frame. This malformed frame sequence reaches the command assembler through the established AMQP connection.
How might exploitation appear operationally?
The client can throw an unhandled UnsupportedOperationException during frame processing and tear down the connection, rather than reporting a clean protocol-level malformed-frame error. Affected clients may therefore show unexpected connection loss when receiving malformed inbound AMQP traffic.