GHSA-r44w-v6gf-x3p6: High severity pip/pyload-ng vulnerability

Published Oct 9, 2026
·
Updated

Summary

The API-key cache in checkapikey() allows an attacker to authenticate with a forged API key as long as the legitimate key for the same keyid has been used recently.

On a cache hit, the API key secret is never verified, resulting in a complete authentication bypass during the cache lifetime.

---

Affected Components

- src/pyload/core/api/init.py - Api.checkapikey()

- src/pyload/core/database/apikeydatabase.py - checkapikey() - checkkey()

The cache is used by normal API requests through:

- src/pyload/webui/app/helpers.py

which calls:

python api.checkapikey(apikey)

without providing a ttl, meaning the default 300-second cache is always enabled.

---

Root Cause

Successful API key validations are cached in:

python self.apikeycache

using the following structure:

python { keyid: (timestamp, cacheddata) }

The cache key is based only on keyid, and that value is parsed directly from the user-supplied API key rather than being obtained from a trusted lookup.

When a cache hit occurs within the TTL, checkapikey() returns:

python { "success": True, "data": cacheddata }

after checking only:

- expiresat

At no point on this execution path is the supplied secret:

text apikey[-43:]

compared against the stored key hash.

---

The actual secret verification exists only in:

python checkkey()

which correctly uses:

python hmac.comparedigest()

However, this function is only reached on a cache miss through the database layer's checkapikey() implementation.

Furthermore, the cached object cannot be used for verification because it intentionally does not include the stored key hash.

The cached record contains only:

- id - userid - name - createdat - expiresat - lastused

Since keyhash is absent, the cache lacks the information required to validate the presented secret.

As a result, once a legitimate request populates the cache, every subsequent request using the same keyid within the 300-second cache window is accepted without validating the secret.

---

Impact

keyid values are small sequential integers assigned when API keys are created (1, 2, 3, ...), making them trivial to enumerate.

The API key format is also publicly reconstructable from the source code.

An attacker therefore does not need to know any valid API key secret.

They only need a keyid whose legitimate key has been used within the previous five minutes, which is likely on an actively used deployment.

During that cache window, a forged API key follows exactly the same authentication path as a legitimate key and inherits the associated user's permissions.

This results in a complete remote authentication bypass.

I would classify the issue as Critical severity.

---

Estimated CVSS v3.1

AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

(AC:H only because successful exploitation depends on the cache already containing an entry.)

---

Reproduction

1. Create an administrator account.

---

2. Generate an API key.

Example:

text pl11<43-character-secret>

where:

keyid = 1

---

3. Send a legitimate authenticated request.

bash curl \ -H "X-API-Key: pl11<real-43-char-secret>" \ http://127.0.0.1:8000/api/status

Expected response:

text HTTP/1.1 200 OK

---

4. Within 300 seconds, send the same request using a forged API key.

bash curl \ -H "X-API-Key: pl11xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" \ http://127.0.0.1:8000/api/status

Observed response:

text HTTP/1.1 200 OK

The request succeeds even though the API key secret is entirely incorrect.

---

Control Test

If the forged API key is sent before any legitimate request has populated the cache, the server correctly returns:

text HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized

The only difference between the failing and succeeding forged request is whether the cache already contains an entry for that keyid.

This isolates the vulnerability specifically to the cache-hit path.

---

Suggested Fix

Cache hits should never replace secret verification.

Possible approaches include:

- Store a value derived from the complete API key (or its hash) in the cache and verify it using hmac.comparedigest() on every cache hit before returning success.

- Alternatively, key the cache using a value derived from the entire API key secret (for example, a cryptographic hash of the complete API key) rather than using only keyid.

Regardless of implementation, the security invariant should remain:

The API key secret must be validated on every authenticated request, regardless of whether the cache is hit or missed.

Affected Software

1 affected componentFixes available
pip/pyload-ng<0.5.0b3.dev101
0.5.0b3.dev101

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade pip/pyload-ng to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 0.5.0b3.dev101
  2. Compensating control

    Change the API-key cache implementation so cache keys are derived from the entire API-key secret (for example, a cryptographic hash) rather than only key_id, and store a derived value of the complete secret in the cached record. On every cache hit, validate the presented secret with hmac.compare_digest() before returning success; the API-key secret must be verified on every authenticated request.

Event History

Oct 9, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·04:43 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·04:43 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203