GHSA-rf68-8gjr-36q7: Go/github.com/nezhahq/nezha vulnerability
Summary
Nezha v2.2.3 regresses the GHSA-9rc6-8cjv-rcvx host header injection fix for deployments where the new dashboardhost setting is empty. In that configuration, /api/v1/oauth2/{provider} again reflects the request Host header into the OAuth2 redirecturi sent to the identity provider, even if installhost is configured.
Impact
An attacker who can get a victim to start OAuth2 login through a request that reaches Nezha with a forged Host header can make Nezha send an attacker-controlled callback URL as the OAuth2 redirecturi. If the configured OAuth2 provider accepts that redirect URI, the victim's authorization code is sent to the attacker origin. The attacker can then complete the OAuth2 binding or login flow described in GHSA-9rc6.
This is configuration-dependent, but it affects a realistic upgrade/default state because dashboardhost is a new optional field. The original v2.2.0 fix fell back to installhost; current v2.2.3 only falls back when dashboardhost is non-empty.
Reproduction
On current v2.2.3 / master commit 3d74cd9431a48fa89c6489689eac82a872799ea0, configure OAuth2 and set an existing dashboard host only through installhost, leaving dashboardhost empty. Then send the OAuth2 redirect request with a forged Host header:
http GET /api/v1/oauth2/github?type=1 HTTP/1.1 Host: evil.attacker.test X-Forwarded-Proto: https
The generated OAuth2 authorization URL contains:
text redirecturi=https%3A%2F%2Fevil.attacker.test%2Fapi%2Fv1%2Foauth2%2Fcallback
A minimal route-level unit test demonstrating the issue is:
go func TestOAuth2RedirectRegressionWhenDashboardHostEmptyReflectsForgedHost(t testing.T) { defer setupOAuth2Test(t)() singleton.Conf.InstallHost = "legit-dashboard.example.com" singleton.Conf.DashboardHost = "" singleton.Conf.Oauth2["github"] = &model.Oauth2Config{ ClientID: "client-id", ClientSecret: "client-secret", Endpoint: model.Oauth2Endpoint{AuthURL: "https://idp.example.test/authorize", TokenURL: "https://idp.example.test/token"}, Scopes: []string{"openid"}, }
c, := newOAuth2Ctx(t) c.Params = gin.Params{{Key: "provider", Value: "github"}} c.Request.Host = "evil.attacker.test" c.Request.URL.RawQuery = "type=1" c.Request.Header.Set("X-Forwarded-Proto", "https")
resp, err := oauth2redirect(c) require.NoError(t, err)
parsed, err := url.Parse(resp.Redirect) require.NoError(t, err) require.Equal(t, "https://evil.attacker.test/api/v1/oauth2/callback", parsed.Query().Get("redirecturi")) }
The corresponding control with DashboardHost = "panel.example.com" pins the same forged request to https://panel.example.com/api/v1/oauth2/callback, so the issue is specifically the empty dashboardhost fallback.
Root cause
Current cmd/dashboard/controller/oauth2.go chooses the request Host unless DashboardHost is non-empty:
go host := c.Request.Host if !singleton.IsReservedDashboardHost(host) && singleton.Conf != nil && singleton.Conf.DashboardHost != "" { host = singleton.Conf.DashboardHost } return scheme + host + "/api/v1/oauth2/callback"
The v2.2.0 fix used InstallHost as the fallback for untrusted request hosts. After DashboardHost was introduced, empty dashboardhost now disables host pinning and reintroduces the original Host header injection behavior for those deployments.
Remediation
Build the OAuth2 callback URL from a deterministic configured origin. For example:
1. Use DashboardHost when it is set. 2. Otherwise fall back to InstallHost if it is set, preserving the v2.2.0 invariant for existing deployments. 3. If neither value is set, reject OAuth2 redirect initiation with a configuration error instead of reflecting request Host.
Please also add a regression test that InstallHost plus empty DashboardHost does not reflect a forged Host into redirecturi.
Affected Software
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Which deployments are exposed?
Deployments running Nezha v2.2.3 or the identified master commit are exposed when OAuth2 is configured, dashboard_host is empty, and the dashboard host is configured only through install_host. This is a realistic upgrade or default state because dashboard_host is a new optional field.
What does an attacker need for exploitation to succeed?
The attacker must cause a victim to begin an OAuth2 login through a request that reaches Nezha with a forged Host header. The configured OAuth2 provider must also accept the attacker-controlled redirect URI.
How can I determine whether my configuration is affected?
Check whether dashboard_host is empty while install_host is the only setting defining the existing dashboard host, and whether OAuth2 is enabled. In that state, the OAuth2 endpoint can derive the redirect URI from the request Host header rather than using install_host.