GHSA-rqf5-2wxv-rjf4: Maven/org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client vulnerability
Impact A Digest challenge that does not yield a usable nonce is treated as a Basic challenge. The client then answers it with Authorization: Basic, which carries the username and password base64 encoded and so recoverable by anyone who sees the request.
Any of these is enough, sent by whoever writes the 401 or 407:
WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="protected" WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="protected", nonce=""
The challenge announces itself as Digest, so it passes the check that would otherwise reject a non-Digest challenge for a Digest realm. It then fails to produce a nonce, and the absence of a nonce is what selected Basic. A server offering plain Basic to a Digest realm gets nothing, so labelling the challenge Digest and leaving the nonce out is what makes the difference.
This is reachable by anyone who can write the challenge: a malicious or compromised origin, a proxy, or an attacker on a plaintext hop. Digest exists precisely to keep the password off those hops. A server that stores only HA1, and anyone impersonating the real origin, does not otherwise learn the password itself, so the disclosure enables reuse against other services.
Both the target and the proxy paths are affected, through parseWWWAuthenticateHeader and parseProxyAuthenticateHeader.
Affected versions 3.x: up to and including 3.0.12 2.x: up to and including 2.16.0
This is long-standing behaviour on both lines, not a recent regression. On 3.0.12 there is one additional way to reach it: a quoted parameter ending in an unescaped backslash, such as realm="C:\", makes the closing quote read as escaped so the nonce is never found. That trigger is specific to 3.0.12. The downgrade it led to is fixed, but the nonce is still lost on such a challenge: every conformant reader treats the closing quote as escaped. The exchange now fails instead of falling back to Basic.
Patches Fixed in 3.0.13 on the 3.x line and in 2.16.1 on the 2.x line. The scheme now comes from the challenge itself instead of being inferred from whether a nonce was found, so a Digest challenge stays Digest even when it cannot be read. With no nonce it produces no Authorization header at all, which fails the exchange rather than downgrading it.
The 3.x fix also corrects quoted-pair handling so that a backslash before any character other than a quote or another backslash is kept as written, matching Apache HttpComponents. That repairs a 3.0.12 regression where an unescaped realm such as DOMAIN\Users was corrupted to DOMAINUsers and failed every digest comparison. This is a deliberate deviation from a strict reading of RFC 9110 Section 5.6.4, under which a backslash before any character is a quoted-pair. Reading it strictly is what corrupts the unescaped spelling that servers actually send, and the decoding is not reversible either way, so the client follows the same rule as Apache HttpComponents.
Workarounds No configuration prevents this. Until you can upgrade, do not use Digest authentication against a server you do not control, and do not use it over plaintext HTTP.
Details Realm.Builder.parseWWWAuthenticateHeader and parseProxyAuthenticateHeader selected the scheme with isNonEmpty(nonce) ? AuthScheme.DIGEST : AuthScheme.BASIC, so any challenge that produced no nonce became a Basic challenge and Unauthorized401Interceptor resent the request using computeBasicAuthentication.
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
maven/org.asynchttpclient:async-http-clientto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 2.16.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
maven/org.asynchttpclient:async-http-clientto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 3.0.13 - Upgrade
Upgrade to a fixed release to a version that resolves this vulnerability.
Fixed in 3.0.13 - Upgrade
Upgrade to a fixed release to a version that resolves this vulnerability.
Fixed in 2.16.1 - Compensating control
Until upgrading, do not use Digest authentication against a server you do not control, and do not use it over plaintext HTTP.
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Who can trigger credential disclosure?
Any party that can write the authentication challenge can trigger it, including a malicious or compromised origin server, a proxy, or an attacker able to modify traffic on a plaintext hop.
What does an attacker need to send to exploit this behavior?
They need to return a 401 or 407 challenge labelled as Digest but without a usable nonce, such as a Digest challenge with no nonce parameter or an empty nonce. This causes the client to respond using Basic authentication.
How can I tell whether a request was affected?
Inspect authentication exchanges for a Digest challenge that lacks a usable nonce followed by an outbound Authorization: Basic header. That header carries the username and password in base64-encoded, recoverable form.
Why is this more serious than a server simply requesting Basic authentication?
A plain Basic challenge for a Digest realm is rejected. The problematic challenge identifies itself as Digest, passes that check, and then omits a usable nonce so the client selects Basic authentication instead.