GHSA-w253-m66g-rx24: Input Validation

Published Oct 8, 2026
·
Updated

Summary

Coraza fails to inspect URL-encoded form bodies when their valid Content-Type contains a media-type parameter, for example:

http Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=UTF-8

An unauthenticated attacker can use this header to hide the complete form body from custom Coraza rules that inspect ARGSPOST or REQUESTBODY, while the bundled Go HTTP middleware forwards the body and the backend parses it normally.

This is a deterministic request-body inspection bypass. Suggested severity: Medium. Current OWASP CRS includes rule 901340, which forces fallback inspection and mitigates this path; this report does not claim a bypass of an unmodified current CRS ruleset

Details

The affected component is request-body processor selection in internal/corazawaf/transaction.go.

Transaction.AddRequestHeader compares the complete lowercased header value using exact equality:

go case "content-type": val := strings.ToLower(value) if val == "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" { tx.variables.reqbodyProcessor.Set("URLENCODED") } else if strings.HasPrefix(val, "multipart/form-data") { tx.variables.reqbodyProcessor.Set("MULTIPART") }

Source: internal/corazawaf/transaction.go, lines 383-390.

The media type of application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=UTF-8 remains application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset is a parameter. Because Coraza compares the entire header, the comparison fails and REQBODYPROCESSOR remains empty.

ProcessRequestBody treats the empty processor as success:

go rbp = strings.ToLower(rbp) if rbp == "" { tx.WAF.Rules.Eval(types.PhaseRequestBody, tx) return tx.interruption, nil }

Source: internal/corazawaf/transaction.go, lines 1115-1120.

Coraza therefore evaluates phase 2 without parsing the body and without setting REQBODYERROR. The URL-encoded processor that normally populates ARGSPOST, REQUESTBODY, and REQUESTBODYLENGTH is never invoked.

The bundled middleware buffers and reconstructs the full request body before invoking the backend. The backend consequently receives data that was absent from Coraza's body variables.

The issue exists in the standard compiled implementation; no special build tag is required. Request-body access defaults to Off in an empty configuration, but Coraza's recommended configuration enables it with SecRequestBodyAccess On.

PoC

Save this self-contained test as parameterizedformbypasstest.go in the Coraza repository root:

go package corazatest

import ( "net/http" "net/http/httptest" "strings" "testing"

coraza "github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3" corazahttp "github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3/http" )

func TestParameterizedFormInspectionBypass(t testing.T) { cfg := coraza.NewWAFConfig().WithDirectives( SecRuleEngine On SecRequestBodyAccess On SecRule ARGSPOST:cmd "@streq evil" "id:910001,phase:2,deny,status:403,t:none" )

waf, err := coraza.NewWAF(cfg) if err != nil { t.Fatal(err) }

backendSaw := "" handler := corazahttp.WrapHandler(waf, http.HandlerFunc( func(w http.ResponseWriter, r http.Request) { if err := r.ParseForm(); err != nil { t.Fatal(err) } backendSaw = r.PostForm.Get("cmd") w.WriteHeader(http.StatusNoContent) }, ))

req := httptest.NewRequest( http.MethodPost, "http://example.test/", strings.NewReader("cmd=evil"), ) req.Header.Set( "Content-Type", "application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=UTF-8", )

rec := httptest.NewRecorder() handler.ServeHTTP(rec, req)

if rec.Code != http.StatusNoContent { t.Fatalf("expected request to reach backend, status=%d", rec.Code) } if backendSaw != "evil" { t.Fatalf("backend did not receive malicious value: %q", backendSaw) } }

Run:

bash go test . -run TestParameterizedFormInspectionBypass -v

Observed:

text === RUN TestParameterizedFormInspectionBypass --- PASS: TestParameterizedFormInspectionBypass (0.00s) PASS

The test passes only when Coraza fails to return its configured 403 response and the backend parses cmd=evil.

As a control, change the header to:

http Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded

Coraza then selects the URL-encoded processor, exposes cmd=evil as ARGSPOST:cmd, and returns 403 before the backend runs.

Impact

This is a parser differential and request-body inspection bypass affecting applications protected by custom Coraza rules.

An unauthenticated attacker can add charset=UTF-8 to an ordinary form request. Coraza then runs phase-2 rules without the submitted parameters and reports no body-processing failure, while the application receives and processes those parameters.

Rules relying on these variables are affected on this path:

- ARGSPOST - ARGS for POST-derived values - ARGSPOSTNAMES - ARGSNAMES - REQUESTBODY - REQUESTBODYLENGTH

This defeats custom rules intended to reject injection strings, dangerous commands, or forbidden business values in form fields. The final application impact depends on the backend behavior that the bypassed rule was intended to protect.

Affected operators are those who enable request-body access and rely on automatic URL-encoded parsing without current CRS rule 901340, ctl:forceRequestBodyVariable=On, an explicitly forced processor, or equivalent backend validation.

The fix is to parse Content-Type according to MIME syntax and compare the normalized media type without parameters, for example with Go's mime.ParseMediaType. If an expected body has no processor, Coraza should expose an explicit processing error instead of silently evaluating phase 2 with empty variables.

Follow-up (2026-09-30): duplicate Content-Type headers desynchronize processor selection from the parsed body

The original fix made body-processor selection tolerant of media-type parameters (charset=UTF-8 etc.) by switching from exact equality to strings.HasPrefix. A second, distinct gap was found while reviewing that same selection code: it never accounted for a request carrying more than one Content-Type header.

Root cause

Transaction.AddRequestHeader is called once per header by the integrator (documented contract). Its content-type case runs on every call:

go case "content-type": val := strings.ToLower(value) if strings.HasPrefix(val, "application/x-www-form-urlencoded") { tx.variables.reqbodyProcessor.Set("URLENCODED") } else if strings.HasPrefix(val, "multipart/form-data") { tx.variables.reqbodyProcessor.Set("MULTIPART") }

A request with two Content-Type headers therefore has its body-processor selection silently overwritten by the last one, since each call unconditionally calls Set. Meanwhile, ProcessRequestBody extracts the mimeType it passes to whichever processor gets selected from requestHeaders.Get("content-type")[0] -- the first value (internal/corazawaf/transaction.go, a few hundred lines below AddRequestHeader) -- and Go's net/http Header.Get (what a typical backend uses) also returns only the first value. So selection follows the last header while everything else follows the first, and the two can disagree entirely.

PoC

http Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=XyZ Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded

with a genuine multipart body containing cmd=evil and a shell.php file upload. Against commit 19b86824:

- reqbodyProcessor resolves to "URLENCODED" (the second, spoofed header wins). - The URL-encoded processor runs against the raw multipart body text, parses without error, and produces nothing. - ARGSPOST:cmd, FILES, and FILESNAMES are all empty -- the entire payload is invisible to any rule inspecting those variables. - The backend (or any integrator using Header.Get, which reads the first value) still sees Content-Type: multipart/form-data and parses cmd=evil and the uploaded shell.php normally.

Current OWASP CRS includes rule 920620 (Content-Type header sanity check via count/format), which catches this shape; the recommended coraza.conf-recommended has no equivalent, so a Coraza deployment with only custom rules (no CRS) is exposed.

Fix

Only the first Content-Type header may set reqbodyProcessor: guard the existing logic with if tx.variables.reqbodyProcessor.Get() == "". This makes header-driven processor selection consistent with ProcessRequestBody's own mimeType extraction and with standard Header.Get semantics, without a new field (nothing else can set reqbodyProcessor before headers finish processing; ctl:requestBodyProcessor and ForceRequestBodyVariable both run afterward, in phase 1 rule evaluation and body processing respectively, and are unaffected).

As defense in depth, a rule author can also detect the anomaly directly today, with no code change: SecRule &REQUESTHEADERS:Content-Type "@gt 1" "deny,..." -- left as a suggested addition to coraza.conf-recommended rather than bundled into this fix, since it is a policy choice (deny vs. flag) rather than a correctness requirement.

AI involvement disclosure

- AI tools/models used: Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic), via Claude Code. - What was generated/assisted: the vulnerability hypothesis and repro shape were supplied by the reporter as an existing written finding; Claude Sonnet 5 independently re-derived the root cause by reading the current source, traced the mimeType/Header.Get first-value asymmetry, wrote and ran a fresh PoC against commit 19b86824 confirming the full bypass (ARGSPOST/FILES/FILESNAMES all empty), verified the fix closes it, and drafted this addendum. - Review performed: reproduced by hand against a clean checkout of commit 19b86824 before and after the fix using the real Transaction API (AddRequestHeader x2, WriteRequestBody, ProcessRequestBody); confirmed the regression test fails deterministically against the pre-fix code and passes after it; ran the full test suite, the build-tag matrix (coraza.nomemoize, coraza.rule.multiphaseevaluation, coraza.rule.noregexmultiline), and the testing/coreruleset CRS regression suite, all green; reviewed by a human maintainer (fzipi) before this addendum was submitted.

Fix: https://github.com/corazawaf/coraza-ghsa-w253-m66g-rx24/pull/2

Patched in 3.8.1

The 3.8.0 fix was incomplete. 3.8.1 completes it: only the first Content-Type header now selects the body processor (the one a typical backend reads with Header.Get), and leading whitespace in the media type, including Unicode whitespace that net/http accepts, is trimmed the way mime.ParseMediaType trims it. Upgrade to 3.8.1; 3.8.0 is listed as affected.

Severity (revised 2026-10-02)

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N (5.8, Medium).

Attack Complexity is Low: every form and multipart parser accepts these Content-Type values. The previous vector used Scope Unchanged (5.3).

Impact metrics follow the convention used across Coraza's WAF-bypass advisories: the vulnerable component is Coraza, but the impact lands on the protected application, so Scope is Changed. The bypass hides a payload from inspection; the application still has to be vulnerable to it, so Integrity is Low and Confidentiality is not scored separately.

AI involvement in this section: Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), via Claude Code, re-derived the CVSS vector from the project's triage guidance (AGENTS.md, "CVSS preconditions get verified, not copied from the report") and drafted this text. A human maintainer (fzipi) chose the S:C/I:L impact convention and directed this update.

Affected Software

1 affected componentFixes available
go/github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3>=3.0.4<3.8.1
3.8.1

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade go/github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3 to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.8.1
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade Coraza to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.8.1
  3. Configuration

    Add `SecRule &REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Type "@gt 1" "deny,..."` to reject requests containing multiple Content-Type headers.

    Coraza SecRule &REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Type = @gt 1

Event History

Oct 8, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·05:51 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·05:51 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Who is exposed to this bypass?

Deployments using Coraza custom rules that inspect ARGS_POST or REQUEST_BODY for URL-encoded form submissions are exposed if requests can reach the bundled Go HTTP middleware. The issue applies when the form Content-Type includes a valid media-type parameter, such as charset=UTF-8.

2

What does an attacker need to exploit it?

An attacker does not need authentication, user interaction, or special request conditions. They can send a URL-encoded form body with a Content-Type value such as application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=UTF-8, causing the body to evade the affected Coraza inspection path while the backend still parses it.

3

Are deployments using the current OWASP Core Rule Set affected?

The report states that current OWASP CRS includes rule 901340, which forces fallback inspection and mitigates this path. It does not claim a bypass of an unmodified current CRS ruleset.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203