GHSA-x5c9-v98j-722r: High severity npm/9router vulnerability

Published Sep 23, 2026
·
Updated

Summary

9router treats local loopback requests as trusted and allows access to /v1/ without an API key. In a documented/common reverse-proxy deployment where nginx forwards public traffic to the backend via 127.0.0.1, external non-Origin requests are misclassified as local. This allows unauthenticated access to /v1 APIs such as /v1/models, and may allow abuse of configured upstream provider credentials depending on the enabled providers.

Details

- Affected version / commit: 9router v0.4.80 @ b282f05. - Deployment precondition: a same-host reverse proxy (e.g. nginx) forwarding public traffic to the backend on 127.0.0.1 / localhost. This mirrors the documented cloud deployment (proxypass http://localhost:20128 with X-Real-IP / X-Forwarded-For). - Observed behaviour: - The direct backend (direct-backend, port 18081) returns 401 for /v1/models without an API key. - A direct request that spoofs X-9r-Real-IP: 127.0.0.1 still returns 401: the custom server deletes the client-supplied header and overwrites it with the real socket address, so naive header spoofing does not work against the direct backend. - The proxied path (reverse-proxy, port 18080) returns 200 with the full model catalog for the same /v1/models request without any API key. - A proxied request that carries an Origin header returns 401. The bypass therefore primarily affects curl / SDK / server-side / non-browser clients, which do not send Origin. - Root cause: the backend's local/remote decision relies on perceived socket/loopback locality after reverse proxying. Because nginx connects to the backend from 127.0.0.1, the backend stamps a loopback client address for every internet client and treats the request as local, skipping the /v1 API-key requirement. The forwarded X-Real-IP / X-Forwarded-For headers that carry the true client IP are ignored for this decision. - This is not a simple client header-spoofing issue (the direct-spoof control above proves header spoofing is rejected); it is a property of how loopback proxy traffic is trusted.

Proof of Concept

This repository is a self-contained Docker Compose reproduction. No real provider is called and no real API key is required.

1. Build and start the stack: bash docker compose up --build 2. Direct baseline (no API key): bash curl -i http://127.0.0.1:18081/v1/models 3. Direct spoof control: bash curl -i -H "X-9r-Real-IP: 127.0.0.1" http://127.0.0.1:18081/v1/models 4. Reverse-proxy bypass (no API key): bash curl -i http://127.0.0.1:18080/v1/models 5. Reverse-proxy Origin control: bash curl -i -H "Origin: http://evil.example" http://127.0.0.1:18080/v1/models

Expected evidence

| Request | Result | |---------|--------| | Direct 18081, no key | 401 Unauthorized ({"error":"API key required for remote API access"}) | | Direct 18081, X-9r-Real-IP: 127.0.0.1 spoof | 401 Unauthorized | | Proxied 18080, no key | 200 OK with the full model catalog | | Proxied 18080, with Origin | 401 Unauthorized |

Impact

- Unauthenticated access to the /v1 API surface in the affected reverse-proxy deployment. - Model enumeration via /v1/models. - Possible abuse of the operator's configured upstream provider credentials through /v1/chat/completions and other /v1 proxy endpoints (the attacker spends the operator's provider quota/keys without holding any key of their own). - Actual impact depends on which providers are configured and how the instance is exposed to the public internet. - The attacker requires no API key.

Suggested Fix

- Do not use client/proxy/socket IP locality as an authentication bypass. - Require an API key by default for /v1/ on public listeners. - If local trust is genuinely needed, bind it to an unguessable server-generated secret or to a Unix domain socket that is only accessible locally — not to "the connection looks like loopback". - When running behind reverse proxies, use an explicit trusted-proxy configuration and a real client-IP derivation (e.g. a vetted X-Forwarded-For chain), and never treat all loopback proxy traffic as end-user-local. - Document a secure reverse-proxy configuration for operators.

Affected Software

1 affected componentFixes available
npm/9router<=0.4.80
0.5.2

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade npm/9router to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 0.5.2
  2. Configuration

    Require an API key by default for all /v1/* endpoints exposed on public listeners.

    9router API-key requirement for /v1/* on public listeners = required by default
  3. Configuration

    Configure an explicit trusted-proxy policy and derive the real client IP from a vetted X-Forwarded-For chain; do not treat all loopback proxy traffic as end-user-local or use client/proxy/socket IP locality as an authentication bypass.

    9router reverse-proxy deployment trusted-proxy configuration and client-IP derivation = explicit trusted proxy with a vetted X-Forwarded-For chain
  4. Compensating control

    If local trust is genuinely needed, bind it to an unguessable server-generated secret or expose it through a Unix domain socket accessible only locally, rather than trusting connections solely because they appear to originate from loopback.

Event History

Sep 23, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·06:12 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·06:12 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are exposed?

Deployments with a same-host reverse proxy, such as nginx, that forwards public traffic to 9router through 127.0.0.1 or localhost are exposed. This includes the documented cloud deployment pattern using proxy_pass http://localhost:20128 with X-Real-IP and X-Forwarded-For.

2

Does an attacker need an API key or a spoofed client-IP header?

No API key is required for affected requests reaching the backend through the vulnerable proxied path. Simply sending X-9r-Real-IP: 127.0.0.1 directly to the backend does not work, because 9router replaces that client-supplied header with the real socket address; the issue depends on the reverse-proxy path.

3

What can an unauthenticated requester access?

Unauthenticated access to /v1 APIs, including /v1/models, is possible through the affected deployment path. Depending on enabled providers, this may also permit abuse of upstream provider credentials configured in 9router.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203