GHSA-xxph-c9ww-hj94: Medium severity maven/com.google.guava:guava vulnerability

Published Oct 27, 2026
·
Updated

CompactHashMap/CompactHashSet/MapMakerInternalMap native deserialization triggers uncontrolled memory allocation

Summary

CompactHashMap, CompactHashSet, and MapMakerInternalMap implement readObject(ObjectInputStream) by reading an attacker-controlled elementCount or initialCapacity from the stream. On the very first insertion during or after deserialization (for the CompactHash collections, inside allocArrays()) or immediately during deserialization (for MapMakerInternalMap), the implementation eagerly allocates arrays sized to that full, unvalidated value (up to CompactHashing.MAXSIZE = 2^30-1, ~1.07 billion, for example) before the rest of the stream's actual content has been consumed. A 72-byte malicious serialized stream containing a single tiny element can force a multi-gigabyte allocation and crash a JVM with OutOfMemoryError, dynamically confirmed against the current release.

Details

CompactHashMap.readObject() (guava/src/com/google/common/collect/CompactHashMap.java):

java private void readObject(ObjectInputStream stream) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException { stream.defaultReadObject(); int elementCount = stream.readInt(); if (elementCount < 0) { throw new InvalidObjectException("Invalid size: " + elementCount); } init(elementCount); for (int i = 0; i < elementCount; i++) { K key = (K) stream.readObject(); V value = (V) stream.readObject(); put(key, value); } }

elementCount is only checked for being non-negative; there is no upper bound and no relationship enforced between the declared count and how much data actually follows in the stream. init(elementCount) (line 251) just stores the value (clamped to [1, CompactHashing.MAXSIZE], i.e. up to 2^30-1):

java void init(int expectedSize) { Preconditions.checkArgument(expectedSize >= 0, "Expected size must be >= 0"); this.metadata = Ints.constrainToRange(expectedSize, 1, CompactHashing.MAXSIZE); }

The real allocation is deferred to allocArrays(), which fires lazily on the first put() call — i.e. after only one key/value pair has actually been read off the wire:

java int allocArrays() { ... int expectedSize = metadata; int buckets = CompactHashing.tableSize(expectedSize); this.table = CompactHashing.createTable(buckets); setHashTableMask(buckets - 1); this.entries = new int[expectedSize]; this.keys = new Object[expectedSize]; this.values = new Object[expectedSize]; return expectedSize; }

With expectedSize near CompactHashing.MAXSIZE (2^30-1), this single call allocates a hash table plus three expectedSize-length arrays — multiple gigabytes — triggered by a stream that has, at that point, only supplied one small real element. CompactHashSet.readObject()/allocArrays() have the identical shape. CompactLinkedHashMap/CompactLinkedHashSet extend these classes and inherit the same unguarded path.

The problem with MapMakerInternalMap is similar, with a size read from the serialized data and stored in a MapMaker instance for later user during deserialization, when the MapMaker is passed back to MapMakerInternalMap and segments are allocated by calling newSegment, whose implementations (example) create Segment instances (example) that allocate arrays of the requested capacity through the newTable helper.

This is the same amplification shape as the already-fixed CVE-2018-10237 (AtomicDoubleArray/CompoundOrdering: attacker declares a large size, library eagerly allocates before validating against actual stream content). That fix rewrote AtomicDoubleArray.readObject() to grow an ImmutableLongArray.Builder incrementally per element actually read, rather than pre-allocating from the declared size — Guava's own HashBiMap.readObject() documents the same defensive principle explicitly in a comment: init(16); // resist hostile attempts to allocate gratuitous heap. CompactHashMap/CompactHashSet do not follow either of these two patterns already present elsewhere in the same codebase.

Reachability: All classes are top-level, implements ... Serializable, and require no special classpath setup beyond Guava being present (near-ubiquitous on JVM backends). A native Java deserialization attacker names the class directly in a hand-crafted stream — no particular Guava factory method needs to have been used by the victim application, exactly as with the precedent CVE.

PoC

Full source and run instructions in the attached poc-guava-compacthash-dos.zip (Maven project, guava:33.7.1-jre — the current latest release — as the only dependency). The PoC:

1. Uses reflection only to legitimately obtain a CompactHashSet instance (it is package-private; a real attacker does not need this step, since they craft the serialized bytes directly rather than calling Guava's own serialization code). 2. Serializes one set with 1 element and one with 2 elements, diffs the two byte streams to locate the exact offset of the elementCount field (byte-precise, not guessed). 3. Patches that one 4-byte field in the 1-element stream from 1 to 0x3FFFFFFF (CompactHashing.MAXSIZE), leaving the rest of the 72-byte stream (one real "A" element) untouched. 4. Feeds the resulting 72-byte malicious stream into a plain new ObjectInputStream(...).readObject() call against the real, unmodified guava-33.7.1-jre.jar.

Actual run output:

-Xmx8g (generous heap) ### Located size field at offset 63, value=1 (expected 1) Malicious stream size: 72 bytes Declared elementCount: 1073741823 (~1.07 billion) Real payload: 1 tiny string element ("A") === RESULT === Exception: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space Time to allocate+fail: 4013 ms Heap used before: 3 MB Heap used after (at failure point): 4103 MB JVM max heap (-Xmx): 8192 MB

-Xmx128m (ordinary service-sized heap) ### Located size field at offset 63, value=1 (expected 1) Malicious stream size: 72 bytes Declared elementCount: 1073741823 (~1.07 billion) Real payload: 1 tiny string element ("A") === RESULT === Exception: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space Time to allocate+fail: 24 ms Heap used before: 4 MB Heap used after (at failure point): 2 MB JVM max heap (-Xmx): 128 MB

A 72-byte input forces ~4.1 GB of real allocation before failing on an 8 GB heap, and crashes a 128 MB heap in 24 ms — over 50,000x amplification between input size and forced allocation.

To reproduce: mvn -q compile dependency:build-classpath -Dmdep.outputFile=cp.txt && java -Xmx128m -cp "target/classes:$(cat cp.txt)" poc.Poc

Impact

Uncontrolled resource consumption (CWE-770 / CWE-400) via native Java deserialization: any application that runs ObjectInputStream.readObject() on data reachable by an attacker, and has Guava on its classpath (true for a large fraction of the JVM ecosystem), can be crashed with a single ~72-byte payload, regardless of what type the application itself expected to deserialize.

Severity

CVSS 3.1: AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H — identical vector to CVE-2018-10237, the precedent this is a sibling of. Recomputed with the full formula: exploitability = 8.22×0.85×0.44×0.85×0.85 = 2.221; ISS = 1-(1×1×0.44) = 0.56; impact = 6.42×0.56 = 3.595; base = roundup(5.816) = 5.9 (Medium).

Affected

com.google.guava:guava, all editions (-jre/-android) — confirmed on the current latest release, 33.7.1-jre. CompactHashMap/CompactHashSet/CompactLinkedHashMap/CompactLinkedHashSet have had this same readObject/allocArrays shape for a long time (probably since they were added in Guava 23.6), and similarly for MapMakerInternalMap (which was introduced in Guava 4.0); not tested against older individual releases.

Suggested fix

Apply the same defense already used elsewhere in this codebase: either clamp the initial init() capacity to a small constant regardless of the declared elementCount (as HashBiMap.readObject() already does — init(16); // resist hostile attempts to allocate gratuitous heap) and grow incrementally as elements are actually read, or grow the backing arrays incrementally per iteration of the deserialization loop (as the fixed AtomicDoubleArray.readObject() does via ImmutableLongArray.Builder) instead of eagerly sizing to the full attacker-declared count on first insert.

Affected Software

1 affected componentFixes available
maven/com.google.guava:guava>=4.0<=33.7.1
33.7.2

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade maven/com.google.guava:guava to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 33.7.2
  2. Compensating control

    Harden deserialization in CompactHashMap, CompactHashSet, CompactLinkedHashMap, CompactLinkedHashSet, and MapMakerInternalMap by avoiding eager allocation based on attacker-controlled elementCount or initialCapacity: initialize capacity with a small constant such as init(16), then grow backing arrays incrementally as elements are actually read.

Event History

Oct 27, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·02:27 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·02:27 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are exposed to this denial-of-service risk?

Deployments are exposed if they deserialize attacker-controlled Java serialization streams that can contain CompactHashMap, CompactHashSet, or MapMakerInternalMap objects. The issue can exhaust JVM memory and terminate the process with OutOfMemoryError.

2

What does an attacker need to exploit this?

The attacker needs to supply a crafted serialized object stream to an ObjectInputStream deserialization path. No authentication, user interaction, confidentiality impact, or integrity impact is indicated by the supplied severity vector.

3

How can we determine whether an application may be affected?

Review ObjectInputStream usage and any endpoints, message handlers, caches, or stored data paths that deserialize data from untrusted or attacker-influenced sources. A malicious stream can declare an extremely large element count or initial capacity while containing only a tiny amount of actual object data.

4

What can be done if an update cannot be applied immediately?

Do not deserialize untrusted Java serialization data, and restrict deserialization inputs so attacker-controlled streams cannot reach affected collection types. This reduces the opportunity for a crafted stream to trigger the oversized allocation.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203