CWE
362
Advisory Published

RHSA-2010:0291: Moderate: gfs-kmod security, bug fix and enhancement update

First published: Tue Mar 30 2010(Updated: )

The gfs-kmod packages contain modules that provide the ability to mount and<br>use GFS file systems.<br>A flaw was found in the gfs_lock() implementation. The GFS locking code<br>could skip the lock operation for files that have the S_ISGID bit<br>(set-group-ID on execution) in their mode set. A local, unprivileged user<br>on a system that has a GFS file system mounted could use this flaw to cause<br>a kernel panic. (CVE-2010-0727)<br>These updated gfs-kmod packages are in sync with the latest kernel<br>(2.6.18-194.el5). The modules in earlier gfs-kmod packages failed to load<br>because they did not match the running kernel. It was possible to<br>force-load the modules. With this update, however, users no longer need to.<br>These updated gfs-kmod packages also fix the following bugs:<br><li> when SELinux was in permissive mode, a race condition during file</li> creation could have caused one or more cluster nodes to be fenced and lock<br>the remaining nodes out of the GFS file system. This race condition no<br>longer occurs with this update. (BZ#471258)<br><li> when ACLs (Access Control Lists) are enabled on a GFS file system, if a</li> transaction that has started to do a write request does not have enough<br>spare blocks for the operation it causes a kernel panic. This update<br>ensures that there are enough blocks for the write request before starting<br>the operation. (BZ#513885)<br><li> requesting a "flock" on a file in GFS in either read-only or read-write</li> mode would sometimes cause a "Resource temporarily unavailable" state error<br>(error 11 for EWOULDBLOCK) to occur. In these cases, a flock could not be<br>obtained on the file in question. This has been fixed with this update so<br>that flocks can successfully be obtained on GFS files without this error<br>occurring. (BZ#515717)<br><li> the GFS withdraw function is a data integrity feature of GFS file systems</li> in a cluster. If the GFS kernel module detects an inconsistency in a GFS<br>file system following an I/O operation, the file system becomes unavailable<br>to the cluster. The GFS withdraw function is less severe than a kernel<br>panic, which would cause another node to fence the node. With this update,<br>you can override the GFS withdraw function by mounting the file system with<br>the "-o errors=panic" option specified. When this option is specified, any<br>errors that would normally cause the system to withdraw cause the system to<br>panic instead. This stops the node's cluster communications, which causes<br>the node to be fenced. (BZ#517145)<br>Finally, these updated gfs-kmod packages provide the following enhancement:<br><li> the GFS kernel modules have been updated to use the new generic freeze</li> and unfreeze ioctl interface that is also supported by the following file<br>systems: ext3, ext4, GFS2, JFS and ReiserFS. With this update, GFS supports<br>freeze/unfreeze through the VFS-level FIFREEZE/FITHAW ioctl interface.<br>(BZ#487610)<br>Users are advised to upgrade to these latest gfs-kmod packages, updated for<br>use with the 2.6.18-194.el5 kernel, which contain backported patches to<br>correct these issues, fix these bugs, and add this enhancement.

Affected SoftwareAffected VersionHow to fix
redhat/gfs-kmod<0.1.34-12.el5
0.1.34-12.el5
redhat/kmod-gfs<0.1.34-12.el5
0.1.34-12.el5
redhat/kmod-gfs-xen<0.1.34-12.el5
0.1.34-12.el5
redhat/kmod-gfs<0.1.34-12.el5
0.1.34-12.el5
redhat/kmod-gfs-xen<0.1.34-12.el5
0.1.34-12.el5

Never miss a vulnerability like this again

Sign up to SecAlerts for real-time vulnerability data matched to your software, aggregated from hundreds of sources.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the severity of RHSA-2010:0291?

    The severity of RHSA-2010:0291 is classified as important.

  • How do I fix RHSA-2010:0291?

    To fix RHSA-2010:0291, update the gfs-kmod, kmod-gfs, or kmod-gfs-xen packages to version 0.1.34-12.el5.

  • What systems are affected by RHSA-2010:0291?

    RHSA-2010:0291 affects Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 systems using GFS file systems.

  • What does CVE-2010-1648 refer to in RHSA-2010:0291?

    CVE-2010-1648 refers to the flaw found in the gfs_lock() implementation that could skip lock operations.

  • Is RHSA-2010:0291 related to file system security?

    Yes, RHSA-2010:0291 addresses security vulnerabilities in the GFS file system's locking mechanism.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2025 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203