Where
-Infinity
0

Versions

v21.0.3 - v21.0.3-if020
16
v22.0.1 - v22.0.1-if006 and later fixesv21.0.2 - v21.0.2-if012 and later fixesv21.0.1 - v21.0.1-if007 and later fixesv20.0.1 - v20.0.3 and later fixesv19.0.1 - v19.0.3 and later fixesv18.0.0 - v18.0.2 and later fixes
16
v22.0.2 - v22.0.2-if004
16
v22.0.2 - v22.0.2-if006 and later fixesv22.0.1 - v22.0.1-if006 and later fixesv21.0.2 - v21.0.2-if012 and later fixesv21.0.1 - v21.0.1-if007 and later fixesv20.0.1 - v20.0.3 and later fixesv19.0.1 - v19.0.3 and later fixesv18.0.0 - v18.0.2 and later fixes
13
21.0.1
12
21.0.3
12
v21.0.3 - v21.0.3-if024
12
18.0.0
11
20.0.3
11
22.0.2
11
v23.0.1 - v23.0.1-if002
11
18.0.2
10
19.0.1
10
19.0.3
10
20.0.1
10
21.0.3-interim_fix_001
10
21.0.3-interim_fix_002
10
21.0.3-interim_fix_003
10
21.0.3-interim_fix_004
10
21.0.3-interim_fix_005
10
21.0.3-interim_fix_006
10
21.0.3-interim_fix_007
10
21.0.3-interim_fix_008
10
22.0.1
9
v21.0.3 - v21.0.3-if023
9
v22.0.2 - v22.0.2-if006 and later fixes v22.0.1 - v22.0.1-if006 and later fixes v21.0.2 - v21.0.2-if012 and later fixes v21.0.1 - v21.0.1-if007 and later fixes v20.0.1 - v20.0.3 and later fixes v19.0.1 - v19.0.3 and later fixes v18.0.0 - v18.0.2 and later fixes
9
21.0.1-interim_fix_001
8
21.0.1-interim_fix_002
8
21.0.1-interim_fix_003
8
21.0.1-interim_fix_004
8
21.0.1-interim_fix_005
8
21.0.1-interim_fix_006
8
21.0.1-interim_fix_007
8
21.0.2
8
21.0.3-interim_fix_009
8
21.0.3-interim_fix_010
8
21.0.3-interim_fix_011
8
21.0.3-interim_fix_012
8
21.0.3-interim_fix_013
8
21.0.3-interim_fix_014
8
21.0.3-interim_fix_015
8
21.0.3-interim_fix_016
8
21.0.3-interim_fix_017
8
v22.0.1 - v22.0.1-if006 and later fixes v21.0.2 - v21.0.2-if012 and later fixesv21.0.1 - v21.0.1-if007 and later fixesv20.0.1 - v20.0.3 and later fixesv19.0.1 - v19.0.3 and later fixesv18.0.0 - v18.0.2 and later fixes
8
v23.0.1 - v23.0.1-if001
8
21.0.3-interim_fix_018
7
21.0.3-interim_fix_019
7
21.0.3-interim_fix_020
7
23.0.1
7
21.0.3-interim_fix_021
6
Severity
9.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Golang Go could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by a flaw when running "go get" on a malicious module. By sending a specially crafted request using linker flags, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the system.

1 / 5
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

gRPC is vulnerable to a denial of service. By sending a specially crafted header, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause a denial of service.

1 / 3
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
5.5
Infoleak
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

A flaw was found in Apache James's Mime4j TempFileStorageProvider class, where it may set improper permissions when utilizing temporary files. This flaw allows a locally authorized attacker to access information outside their intended permissions.

1 / 5
First published (updated )
Severity
3.7
Infoleak
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

A modified, unauthenticated server can send an unterminated string during the establishment of Kerberos transport encryption. When a libpq client application has a Kerberos credential cache and doesn't explicitly disable option "gssencmode", a server can cause libpq to over-read and report an error message containing uninitialized bytes from and following its receive buffer. If libpq's caller somehow makes that message accessible to the attacker, this achieves a disclosure of the over-read bytes. We have not confirmed or ruled out viability of attacks that arrange for a crash or for presence of notable, confidential information in disclosed bytes.

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

A timing based side channel exists in the OpenSSL RSA Decryption implementation which could be sufficient to recover a plaintext across a network in a Bleichenbacher style attack. To achieve a successful decryption an attacker would have to be able to send a very large number of trial messages for decryption. The vulnerability affects all RSA padding modes: PKCS#1 v1.5, RSA-OEAP and RSASVE.

For example, in a TLS connection, RSA is commonly used by a client to send an encrypted pre-master secret to the server. An attacker that had observed a genuine connection between a client and a server could use this flaw to send trial messages to the server and record the time taken to process them. After a sufficiently large number of messages the attacker could recover the pre-master secret used for the original connection and thus be able to decrypt the application data sent over that connection.

1 / 10
Source: NVD
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Use After Free
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A use-after-free vulnerability was found in OpenSSL's BIOnewNDEF function. The public API function BIOnewNDEF is a helper function used for streaming ASN.1 data via a BIO. It is primarily used internally by OpenSSL to support the SMIME, CMS, and PKCS7 streaming capabilities, but it may also be called directly by end-user applications. The function receives a BIO from the caller, prepends a new BIOfasn1 filter BIO onto the front of it to form a BIO chain, and then returns the new head of the BIO chain to the caller. Under certain conditions. For example, if a CMS recipient public key is invalid, the new filter BIO is freed, and the function returns a NULL result indicating a failure. However, in this case, the BIO chain is not properly cleaned up, and the BIO passed by the caller still retains internal pointers to the previously freed filter BIO. If the caller then calls BIOpop() on the BIO, a use-after-free will occur, possibly resulting in a crash.

1 / 8
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Double Free
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A double-free vulnerability was found in OpenSSL's PEMreadbioex function. The function PEMreadbioex() reads a PEM file from a BIO and parses and decodes the "name" (for example, "CERTIFICATE"), any header data, and the payload data. If the function succeeds, then the "nameout," "header," and "data" arguments are populated with pointers to buffers containing the relevant decoded data. The caller is responsible for freeing those buffers. Constructing a PEM file that results in 0 bytes of payload data is possible. In this case, PEMreadbioex() will return a failure code but will populate the header argument with a pointer to a freed buffer. A double-free will occur if the caller also frees this buffer. This will most likely lead to a crash. This could be exploited by an attacker who can supply malicious PEM files for parsing to achieve a denial of service attack.

1 / 8
First published (updated )
Severity
5
Path Traversal, Infoleak
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Apache MINA SSHD could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by improper authorization validation by the RootedFilesystem. By sending a specially crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain information about items outside the rooted tree, and use this information to launch further attacks against the affected system.

1 / 4
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Summary

When running vertx web applications that serve files using StaticHandler on Windows Operating Systems and Windows File Systems, if the mount point is a wildcard () then an attacker can exfiltrate any class path resource.

Details When computing the relative path to locate the resource, in case of wildcards, the code:

https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-web/blob/62c0d66fa1c179ae6a4d57344631679a2b97e60f/vertx-web/src/main/java/io/vertx/ext/web/impl/Utils.java#L83

returns the user input (without validation) as the segment to lookup. Even though checks are performed to avoid escaping the sandbox, given that the input was not sanitized \ are not properly handled and an attacker can build a path that is valid within the classpath.

PoC

https://github.com/adrien-aubert-drovio/vertx-statichandler-windows-traversal-path-vulnerability

1 / 5
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Duplicate Advisory This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-74m5-2c7w-9w3x. This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description There MultipartParser usage in Encode's Starlette python framework before versions 0.25.0 allows an unauthenticated and remote attacker to specify any number of form fields or files which can cause excessive memory usage resulting in denial of service of the HTTP service.

1 / 4
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
4.8
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected in GitHub repository thorsten/phpmyfaq prior to 3.2.0-beta.2.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Buffer Overflow
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed a malicious certificate or for an application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address in a certificate to overflow an arbitrary number of bytes containing the .' character (decimal 46) on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service). In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

DISPUTED The passport-oauth2 package before 1.6.1 for Node.js mishandles the error condition of failure to obtain an access token. This is exploitable in certain use cases where an OAuth identity provider uses an HTTP 200 status code for authentication-failure error reports, and an application grants authorization upon simply receiving the access token (i.e., does not try to use the token). NOTE: the passport-oauth2 vendor does not consider this a passport-oauth2 vulnerability.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
5.1
AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

An implementation flaw was discovered in the AES cipher in the Hotspot component of OpenJDK. This could weaken the cipher protection and lead to confidentiality issue.

1 / 5
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
3.1
Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

An unspecified vulnerability in Java SE related to the Networking component could allow a remote attacker to cause low integrity impacts.

1 / 5
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
3.7
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

An unspecified vulnerability in Java SE related to the Utility component could allow a remote attacker to cause low availability impacts.

1 / 5
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
9.1
Infoleak, Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

A flaw was found in maven. Repositories that are defined in a dependency’s Project Object Model (pom), which may be unknown to users, are used by default resulting in potential risk if a malicious actor takes over that repository or is able to insert themselves into a position to pretend to be that repository. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity.

1 / 5

Remedy

To avoid possible man-in-the-middle related attacks with this flaw, ensure any linked repositories in maven POMs use https and not http.
First published (updated )
Severity
5.4
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

A XSS flaw was found in nodejs-angular. The regex-based input HTML replacement may turn sanitized code into unsanitized one. Wrapping "\<option\>" elements in "\<select\>" ones changes parsing behavior, leading to possibly unsanitizing code.

1 / 5
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
Input Validation
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

chroot in GNU coreutils when used with --userspec allows local users to escape to the parent session via a crafted TIOCSTI ioctl call which pushes characters to the terminal's input buffer.

1 / 3
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Buffer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution.

Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. The risk may be further mitigated based on stack layout for any given platform/compiler.

Pre-announcements of CVE-2022-3602 described this issue as CRITICAL. Further analysis based on some of the mitigating factors described above have led this to be downgraded to HIGH. Users are still encouraged to upgrade to a new version as soon as possible.

In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects.

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
8.1
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

IBM Business Automation Insights could allow an authenticated user to cause a denial of service or corrupt existing data due to the improper validation of input length.

1 / 2
Source: IBM

Remedy

Affected Product(s)Version(s)Remediation / FixIBM Cloud Pak for Business AutomationV25.0.0 - V25.0.0-IF002Apply security fix 25.0.0-IF003 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/readme-ibm-cloud-pak-business-automation-2500-if003 IBM Cloud Pak for Business AutomationV24.0.1 - V24.0.1-IF005Apply security fix 24.0.1-IF006 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/readme-ibm-cloud-pak-business-automation-2401-if006 IBM Cloud Pak for Business AutomationV24.0.0 - V24.0.0-IF007Apply security fix 24.0.0-IF008 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/readme-ibm-cloud-pak-business-automation-2400-if008
First published (updated )
Severity
6.4
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

IBM Business Automation Workflow is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.

1 / 2
Source: IBM

Remedy

Affected Product(s)Version(s)Remediation / FixIBM Cloud Pak for Business AutomationV25.0.0 - V25.0.0-IF002Apply security fix 25.0.0-IF003 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/readme-ibm-cloud-pak-business-automation-2500-if003 IBM Cloud Pak for Business AutomationV24.0.1 - V24.0.1-IF005Apply security fix 24.0.1-IF006 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/readme-ibm-cloud-pak-business-automation-2401-if006 IBM Cloud Pak for Business AutomationV24.0.0 - V24.0.0-IF007Apply security fix 24.0.0-IF008 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/readme-ibm-cloud-pak-business-automation-2400-if008
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

gRPC could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by a flaw when gRPC HTTP2 stack raised a header size exceeded error. By sending a specially crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information, and use this information to launch further attacks against the affected system.

1 / 5
Source: IBM

Remedy

Fixes available in these releases: - 1.52.2: https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.52.2 https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.52.2 - 1.53.1: https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.53.1 https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.53.1 - 1.54.2: https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.54.2 https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.54.2 - 1.55.0: https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.55.0 https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.55.0
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Denial-of-Service in gRPC

1 / 4
Source: Microsoft

Remedy

Fixes available in these releases: - 1.52.2: https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.52.2 https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.52.2 - 1.53.1: https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.53.1 https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.53.1 - 1.54.2: https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.54.2 https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.54.2 - 1.55.0: https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.55.0 https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.55.0
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Code Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Golang Go could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by a flaw when running "go get" on a malicious module. By sending a specially crafted request using linker flags, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the system.

1 / 5
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Code Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Code injection via go command with cgo in cmd/go

1 / 5
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
5.5
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

IBM Business Automation Workflow containers 25.0.0 through 25.0.0 Interim Fix 002, 24.0.1 through 24.0.1 Interim Fix 005, and 24.0.0 through 24.0.0 Interim Fix 006. IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation and IBM Business Automation Workflow containers may disclose sensitve configuration information in a config map.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE

Remedy

Affected Product(s)Version(s)Remediation / FixIBM Business Automation Workflow containersV25.0.0 - V25.0.0-IF002Apply 25.0.0-IF003 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/readme-ibm-business-automation-workflow-containers-25000-interim-fixes IBM Business Automation Workflow containersV24.0.1 - V24.0.1-IF005Apply 24.0.1-IF006 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7183042 IBM Business Automation Workflow containersV24.0.0 - V24.0.0-IF006Apply 24.0.0-IF007 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7159792
First published (updated )
Severity
5.5
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

IBM Business Automation Workflow containers 25.0.0 through 25.0.0 Interim Fix 002, 24.0.1 through 24.0.1 Interim Fix 005, and 24.0.0 through 24.0.0 Interim Fix 006. IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation could allow a local user with access to the container to execute OS system calls.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE

Remedy

Affected Product(s)Version(s)Remediation / FixIBM Business Automation Workflow containersV25.0.0 - V25.0.0-IF002Apply 25.0.0-IF003 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/readme-ibm-business-automation-workflow-containers-25000-interim-fixes IBM Business Automation Workflow containersV24.0.1 - V24.0.1-IF005Apply 24.0.1-IF006 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7183042 IBM Business Automation Workflow containersV24.0.0 - V24.0.0-IF006Apply 24.0.0-IF007 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7159792
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Input Validation
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

AngularJS could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions, caused by a prototype pollution flaw in the merge function. By sending a specially-crafted request using a constructor payload, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to add or modify properties of Object.prototype.

1 / 3
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
7.1
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Angular.js is vulnerable to cross-site scripting, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject malicious script into a Web page which would be executed in a victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting Web site, once the page is viewed. An attacker could use this vulnerability to steal the victim's cookie-based authentication credentials.

1 / 3
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203