Where
-Infinity
0
Severity
6.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

IBM Cloud Pak - Risk Manager stores user credentials in plain clear text which can be read by an authenticated user.

1 / 2
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Weak Encryption
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

IBM Cloud Pak - Risk Manager/IBM Data Risk Manager (iDNA) uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information.

1 / 2
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
First published (updated )
Advisory
IBM-6335281
Severity
7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

IBM Data Risk Manager (iDNA) 2.0.6 contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. IBM X-Force ID: 184983.

1 / 2
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
9
Malicious File Upload
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IBM Data Risk Manager (iDNA) 2.0.6 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to upload arbitrary files, caused by the improper validation of file extensions. By sending a specially-crafted HTTP request, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to upload a malicious file, which could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the vulnerable system. IBM X-Force ID: 184979.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IBM Data Risk Manager (iDNA) 2.0.6 could allow an authenticated user to escalate their privileges to administrator due to insufficient authorization checks. IBM X-Force ID: 184981.

1 / 2
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
5.5
Input Validation
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IBM Data Risk Manager (iDNA) 2.0.6 could allow a privileged user to cause a denial of service due to improper input validation. IBM X-Force ID: 184937.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

IBM Data Risk Manager (iDNA) 2.0.6 stores user credentials in plain in clear text which can be read by an authenticated user. IBM X-Force ID: 184976.

1 / 2
First published (updated )

CSRF

Risk 60
Severity
8.1
CSRF
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

IBM Data Risk Manager (iDNA) 2.0.6 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 184930.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

IBM Data Risk Manager (iDNA) 2.0.6 could disclose sensitive username information to an attacker using a specially crafted HTTP request. IBM X-Force ID: 184929.

1 / 2
First published (updated )

XSS

Risk 34
Severity
5.4
XSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

IBM Data Risk Manager (iDNA) 2.0.6 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 184928.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

IBM Data Risk Manager (iDNA) 2.0.6 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 184927.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

IBM Data Risk Manager (iDNA) 2.0.6 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 184925.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IBM Data Risk Manager (iDNA) 2.0.6 could allow an authenticated user to bypass security and execute actions reserved for admins. IBM X-Force ID: 184922.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

IBM Data Risk Manager (iDNA) 2.0.6 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information using a specially crafted HTTP request. IBM X-Force ID: 184924.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A specially crafted sequence of HTTP/2 requests could trigger high CPU usage for several seconds. If a sufficient number of such requests were made on concurrent HTTP/2 connections, the server could become unresponsive.

Reference: https://tomcat.apache.org/security-8.html

1 / 4
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
4.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

NTP is vulnerable to a denial of service, caused by a memory leak when a CMAC key is used and associated with a CMAC algorithm in the ntp.keys file in ntpd. By sending specially-crafted packets, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to consume all available memory resources.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Use After Free, SQL Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

In resetAccumulator of select.c, there is a possible use after free. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

1 / 3
Source: OSV
First published (updated )
Severity
7
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A deserialization flaw was discovered in Apache Tomcat's use of a FileStore. An attacker can exploit the flaw if all of the following are true: An attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server. The server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore. The PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker-provided object to be deserialized. The attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over. If all these conditions are true, the attacker can use a specifically crafted request to trigger Remote Code Execution through deserialization of the file under their control.

This flaw affects the following Tomcat versions: 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54, and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103.

Upstream commits:

Tomcat 10.0: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/bb33048e3f9b4f2b70e4da2e6c4e34ca89023b1b Tomcat 9.0: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/3aa8f28db7efb311cdd1b6fe15a9cd3b167a2222 Tomcat 8.5: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/ec08af18d0f9ddca3f2d800ef66fe7fd20afef2f Tomcat 7.0: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/53e30390943c18fca0c9e57dbcc14f1c623cfd06

1 / 5
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )

XSS

Risk 40
Severity
6.1
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

A flaw was found in jquery in versions prior to 1.9.0. A cross-site scripting attack is possible as the load method fails to recognize and remove "<script>" HTML tags that contain a whitespace character which results in the enclosed script logic to be executed. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity.

1 / 5
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

A flaw was found in the Linux kernel, where it allows userspace processes, for example, a guest VM, to directly access h/w devices via its VFIO driver modules. The VFIO modules allow users to enable or disable access to the devices' MMIO memory address spaces. If a user attempts to access the read/write devices' MMIO address space when it is disabled, some h/w devices issue an interrupt to the CPU to indicate a fatal error condition, crashing the system. This flaw allows a guest user or process to crash the host system resulting in a denial of service.

1 / 5
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Buffer Overflow, Integer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

An issue was discovered in International Components for Unicode (ICU) for C/C++ through 66.1. An integer overflow, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow, exists in the UnicodeString::doAppend() function in common/unistr.cpp.

1 / 5
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )

XSS

Risk 41
Severity
4.8
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A flaw was found in Apache Tomcat. The HTTP header parsing code used an approach to end-of-line (EOL) parsing that allowed some invalid HTTP headers to be parsed as valid. This led to the possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. The highest threat with this vulnerability is system availability.

1 / 5
First published (updated )

XSS

Risk 41
Severity
4.8
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Apache Tomcat is vulnerable to HTTP request smuggling, caused by a flaw when handling unusual Transfer-Encoding HTTP header. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to poison the web cache, bypass web application firewall protection, and conduct XSS attacks.

1 / 3
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

Apache Tomcat could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by a file read/inclusion vulnerability in the AJP connector. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to read web application files from a vulnerable server and upload malicious JavaServer Pages (JSP) code within a variety of file types and execute arbitrary code on the system.

Note: This vulnerability is known as Ghostcat.

1 / 5
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A vulnerability in Apache Tomcat allows an attacker to remotely trigger a denial of service. An error introduced as part of a change to improve error handling during non-blocking I/O meant that the error flag associated with the Request object was not reset between requests. This meant that once a non-blocking I/O error occurred, all future requests handled by that request object would fail. Users were able to trigger non-blocking I/O errors, e.g. by dropping a connection, thereby creating the possibility of triggering a DoS. Applications that do not use non-blocking I/O are not exposed to this vulnerability. This issue affects Apache Tomcat 10.0.3 to 10.0.4; 9.0.44; 8.5.64.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
9.1
OS Command Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

IBM Data Risk Manager contains an unspecified vulnerability which could allow a remote, authenticated attacker to execute commands on the system.�

1 / 3
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IBM Data Risk Manager 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, 2.0.4, 2.0.5, and 2.0.6 contains a default password for an IDRM administrative account. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to login and execute arbitrary code on the system with root privileges. IBM X-Force ID: 180534.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IBM Data Risk Manager contains a security bypass vulnerability that could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions when configured with SAML authentication. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass the authentication process and gain full administrative access to the system.

1 / 3
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
4.3
Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

IBM Data Risk Manager contains a directory traversal vulnerability that could allow a remote authenticated attacker to traverse directories and send a specially crafted URL request to download arbitrary files from the system.

1 / 3
Source: CISA
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203