See how siemens compares to other vendors in security performance
A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Compact (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), APOGEE PXC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Modular (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), TALON TC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), TALON TC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7). The affected product web service does not properly validate user-supplied input in upload code. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service.
A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Compact (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), APOGEE PXC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Modular (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), TALON TC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), TALON TC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7). The affected product web service does not properly validate user input in multipart handling. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service.
A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Compact (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), APOGEE PXC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Modular (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), TALON TC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), TALON TC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7). The affected product FTP service does not properly validate the length of user-controllable input. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service.
A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Compact (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), APOGEE PXC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Modular (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), TALON TC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), TALON TC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7). The affected product web service does not properly validate the length of user-controllable input. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to read portions of device memory or to cause a denial-of-service condition.
A vulnerability has been identified in Capital Embedded AR Classic 431-422 (All versions), Capital Embedded AR Classic R20-11 (All versions < V2303), Desigo PXC00-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC00-U (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC001-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC100-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC12-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC128-U (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC200-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC22-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC22.1-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC36.1-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC50-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC64-U (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXM20-E (All versions >= V2.3). The affected product does not properly validate input bounds before accessing packet data. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger memory reads outside the intended packet boundaries.
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly perform server-side authorization checks for requests to modify the state of scheduled actions. This could allow an authenticated attacker with minimal privileges to retry, stop, or delete scheduled tasks without proper authorization.
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly perform server-side authorization checks for requests to schedule special operations. This could allow an authenticated attacker with minimal privileges to schedule unauthorized operations on devices.
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly restrict access to database queries used for subnet management. This could allow an authenticated attacker to read, modify, or delete subnet configurations, leading to unauthorized information disclosure and data manipulation.
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly restrict access to various database queries, allowing users to retrieve system-wide information that is not intended for their privilege level. This could allow an authenticated attacker to gather sensitive information about the system's infrastructure, including details on all devices, substations, users, and scheduled activities.
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly perform authorization checks for device disconnection requests. This could allow an authenticated attacker with minimal privileges to disconnect active sessions of other users, including administrators, leading to a denial of service.
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in device group or facility names processed during the Bulk Export workflow. This could allow an authenticated attacker with specific privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database.
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in the Name and Value fields for custom file labels. This could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database.
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly restrict access to sensitive configuration items via specific database queries. This could allow an authenticated attacker to retrieve administrative credentials for various internal systems, leading to unauthorized information disclosure and privilege escalation.
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize the filename of firmware files uploaded to the system. This could allow an authenticated attacker with specific privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database.
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in the Value field of notification conditions processed during the Notification Profile configuration. This could allow an authenticated attacker with specific privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database.
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in facility names processed during the Bulk Import/Export workflow. This could allow an authenticated attacker with specific privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database.
A vulnerability has been identified in .NET Client Library for SIMATIC S7 Webserver API (All versions < V3.3.62). Affected applications do not properly redact PLC restore passwords from HTTP error exception messages. This could allow an attacker with access to logs or other diagnostic output to obtain the plaintext restore password and potentially perform unauthorized operations on the PLC.
A vulnerability has been identified in .NET Client Library for SIMATIC S7 Webserver API (All versions < V3.3.61). Affected applications do not properly validate filenames received from remote servers during ticket downloads. This could allow an attacker who can manipulate the ticket response to write arbitrary files outside the intended download directory and, when overwriting is enabled, replace existing files accessible to the application.
A vulnerability has been identified in Industrial Edge App Publisher (All versions < V1.27.9). The application fails to properly sanitize or escape data received from the backend before rendering it in the user interface. Because the front end is integrated with Node.js, this vulnerability allows for the execution of arbitrary JavaScript, which can be leveraged to achieve remote code execution (RCE) on the victim's machine
A vulnerability has been identified in Industrial Edge App Publisher (All versions < V1.27.9). The affected software does not properly validate the server certificate when initiating a TLS connection. This allows an attacker to intercept and relay communication (Man-in-the-Middle attack) and to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the client and the intended server.
A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC IPC BX-21A (All versions < V31.01.13), SIMATIC IPC RW-543A (All versions < V1.1.4), SIMATIC IPC227G / IPC277G / IPC277G PRO / IPC327G / IPC377G (All versions < V28.01.15). A BIOS vendor test key is present in the UEFI Secure Boot key database. This could allow a local attacker with physical or administrative access to the device to boot an operating system or UEFI application signed with that test key, bypassing UEFI Secure Boot protections even when Secure Boot is enabled, potentially leading to a full loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the device.
A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC V8.0 (All versions < V8.0 Update 11), SIMATIC WinCC V8.1 (All versions < V8.1 Update 7). The affected application does not sufficiently restrict the permissions assigned to a database role. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker with database access to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary commands on the host system where SIMATIC WinCC is installed, potentially leading to a compromise of the system.
A vulnerability has been identified in Industrial Edge Cloud Device (IECD), Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.10, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.11, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.12, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.13, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.14, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.15, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.16, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.17, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.18, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.19, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.20, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.21, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.22, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.23, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.24, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.25, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.26, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.27, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.28, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.5, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.6, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.7, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.8, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.9, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.10, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.11, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.12, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.13, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.14, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.15, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.16, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.17, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.18, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.19, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.20, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.21, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.22, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.23, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.24, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.25, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.26, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.27, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.28, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.5, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.6, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.7, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.8, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.9, Industrial Edge Own Device (IEOD), Industrial Edge Virtual Device (IEVD), SCALANCE LPE9413 (6GK5998-3GS01-2AC2), SCALANCE LPE9433 (6GK5998-3GS11-2AC2), SIMATIC IoT2050 Advanced IED (6ES7647-0BW00-1YA2), SIMATIC IoT2050 SM IED (6ES7647-0CW00-1AA2), SIMATIC IPC BX-21A Industrial Edge Device, SIMATIC IPC BX-39A Industrial Edge Device, SIMATIC IPC BX-59A Industrial Edge Device, SIMATIC IPC127E Industrial Edge Device, SIMATIC IPC227E Industrial Edge Device, SIMATIC IPC227G Industrial Edge Device, SIMATIC IPC427E Industrial Edge Device, SIMATIC IPC847E Industrial Edge Device. Affected systems do not properly restrict access to internal APIs and paths for authenticated users. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to access sensitive internal information, which in the worst case could be leveraged to facilitate unauthorized access to the system.
A vulnerability has been identified in Teamcenter V2412 (All versions < V2412.0013), Teamcenter V2506 (All versions < V2506.0010), Teamcenter V2512 (All versions < V2512.2607), Teamcenter V2606 (All versions < V2606.2607). Affected applications do not properly encode user-supplied input reflected into HTML attribute contexts within the authentication redirect flow (/auth/ endpoint). This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the browser of an authenticated user who loads a crafted URL, enabling the attacker to perform actions within the victim's Teamcenter session.
A vulnerability has been identified in Desigo CC ClickOnce Client V6 (All versions), Desigo CC ClickOnce Client V7 (All versions), Desigo CC family V8 (All versions), Desigo CC family V9 (All versions), Desigo CC Flex Client V6 (All versions), Desigo CC Flex Client V7 (All versions), Desigo CC Installed Client V6 (All versions), Desigo CC Installed Client V7 (All versions). The affected application is vulnerable to Client Code Execution (CCE) due to insufficient input validation when handling scripts embedded within user-defined graphics documents. Specifically, when the script within a graphics document is designed or modified by an attacker to include malicious commands. When a user opens a compromised graphics document, the embedded script is executed on the client application instance, allowing an attacker to write arbitrary files to the client's operating system. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to craft a malicious graphics document and entice a user with sufficient privileges to display it. This could lead to compromise of the client operating system and potential lateral movement within the organization.
A vulnerability has been identified in Siemens License Server (SLS) (All versions < V5.3). The affected application is vulnerable to a path traversal vulnerability due to lack of sanitization of user input. This could allow a remote attacker to access arbitrary files on the application.
A vulnerability has been identified in Siemens License Server (SLS) (All versions < V5.1). The affected application is vulnerable to a local privilege escalation due to an insecure sudoers policy. This could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands and plant malicious files as root, leading to full system compromise.
A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2606.0001). The affected applications contains an out of bounds read vulnerability while parsing specially crafted BMP files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process.
A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2606.0001). The affected applications contains an out of bounds read vulnerability while parsing specially crafted BMP files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process.
A vulnerability has been identified in Desigo DXR2 (All versions < V01.21.233.16-7862), Desigo PXC3 (All versions < V01.21.233.16-7862), Desigo PXC4 (All versions < V02.21.194.36-2715), Desigo PXC5.E003 (All versions < V02.21.194.36-2715), Desigo PXC5.E24 (All versions < V02.21.194.36-2715), Desigo PXC7 (All versions < V02.21.194.36-2715). The affected devices are vulnerable to a denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability. An attacker can exploit this issue by sending a malformed BACnet packet, causing the device to stop responding to BACnet queries. Recovery requires a device reset or reboot to restore normal functionality.