Where
AND
-Infinity
0
Severity
9.1
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Summary

azureidentity.Validate() verifies that the PKCS#7 signer certificate chains to a trusted Azure CA but never verifies the PKCS#7 signature itself. An attacker can embed a legitimate Azure certificate alongside arbitrary content e.g. {"vmId":"<target>"} and the forged vmId will be accepted returning the victim workspace agent's session token.

No authentication is required. The attacker only needs to know a target VM's vmId which is a UUIDv4. that's a practical limitation which would typically require prior access to be exploited

Root Cause

In unpatched Coder releases the signature over the PKCS#7 content is not validated - only the signing certificate is checked.

Impact

An attacker on any Azure VM or with access to a publicly available Azure IMDS certificate from CT logs can:

1. Steal an agent session token by sending a forged PKCS#7 envelope to POST /api/v2/workspaceagents/azure-instance-identity which is unauthenticated. 2. With the stolen token access: - Git SSH private key via GET /workspaceagents/me/gitsshkey: push to repositories and impersonate the workspace owner. - OAuth access tokens via GET /workspaceagents/me/external-auth: GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket tokens in plaintext. - Workspace secrets via the agent manifest: environment variables, file paths, and API keys.

Attack Path Diagram

<img width="5588" height="4176" alt="PKCS7diagram (1)" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/74e88a89-a995-450d-87ab-6feed03579a5" />

Affected Versions

All versions of Coder v2 are affected.

Patches

Fixed in #25286

The fix was backported to all supported release lines:

| Patched Versions | | --- | | v2.33.3 | | v2.32.2 | | v2.31.12 | | v2.30.8 | | v2.29.13 | | v2.24.5 |

Workarounds

If unable to patch we recommend immediately reconfiguring any Azure templates to use token authentication rather than azure-instance-identity until the patch is released and you are fully upgraded.

1. Modify the coderagent.auth value to be token. 2. Add CODERAGENTTOKEN=${coderagent.main.token} to the set of environment variables for the Coder Workspace Agent initialization script.

Recognition

We'd like to thank Ben Tran of calif.io and Anthropic’s Security Team (ANT-2026-22445) for independently disclosing this issue!

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
SSRF
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Summary

Unauthenticated semi-blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the Azure instance identity endpoint (POST /api/v2/workspaceagents/azure-instance-identity). An external attacker can force the Coder server to issue HTTP GET requests to arbitrary internal or external hosts by submitting a crafted PKCS#7 signature. The server does not return the target's response body, but error messages in the API response reveal whether the target is reachable and what type of failure occurred.

Details

The POST /api/v2/workspaceagents/azure-instance-identity endpoint accepts a PKCS#7 signature without authentication. During certificate chain verification, azureidentity.Validate() iterates over the signer certificate's IssuingCertificateURL extension and fetches each URL using http.DefaultClient with no host restriction, no private-IP blocking, and no response-size limit.

An attacker crafts a self-signed certificate whose Common Name matches .metadata.azure.com (passing the allowedSigners regex) and whose IssuingCertificateURL points to an attacker-chosen target. The server fetches that URL and feeds the response body into x509.ParseCertificate. The parsed result is discarded, but the wrapped error string is returned verbatim in the JSON response via Detail: err.Error(). Connection-level errors ("connection refused", "i/o timeout", DNS failures) and certificate-parse errors give the attacker enough signal to infer host reachability and port state without seeing the actual response content.

Root causes:

1. No allowlist on IssuingCertificateURL hosts. Any URL was accepted. 2. http.DefaultClient was used. It follows redirects and connects to private, link-local, and loopback addresses. 3. Unbounded io.ReadAll on the response body (memory exhaustion vector). 4. Raw err.Error() was returned in the JSON response, leaking internal HTTP client errors to the caller.

Impact

This is a semi-blind SSRF: the server makes the outbound request but the HTTP response body is consumed by x509.ParseCertificate and never returned to the attacker.

- Internal network reconnaissance. The attacker can map internal hosts and ports by observing error differentiation in the API response: "connection refused" (port closed), "i/o timeout" (host unreachable or firewalled), DNS failure (host does not exist), or certificate-parse error (port open and responding). This enables systematic scanning of the internal network from the Coder server's vantage point. - Requests to sensitive endpoints. The server can be directed to hit cloud metadata services (e.g. http://169.254.169.254/), internal admin interfaces, or other services. The attacker cannot read the response content, but the request itself may have side effects depending on the target. - Error-based information disclosure. Wrapped Go HTTP client errors in the Detail field expose internal hostnames, IP addresses, port numbers, and network topology details. - Memory exhaustion. The unbounded io.ReadAll on the response body allows an attacker to point IssuingCertificateURL at a large resource, forcing the server to buffer it entirely in memory.

Patches

Fixed in #25274 (commit 57b11d405):

The fix was backported to all supported release lines:

| Release line | Patched version | |---|---| | 2.33 | v2.33.3 | | 2.32 | v2.32.2 | | 2.31 | v2.31.12 | | 2.30 | v2.30.8 | | 2.29 | v2.29.13 | | 2.24 (ESR) | v2.24.5 |

Workarounds

If the Azure identity-auth mechanism is not being used then restrict access to the corresponding endpoint (/api/v2/workspaceagents/azure-instance-identity) using ingress firewall and/or proxy ACLs.

Recognition

We'd like to thank Ben Tran of calif.io and Anthropic's Security Team (ANT-2026-22447) for independently disclosing this issue!

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203