Where
AND
AND
-Infinity
0
Severity
7.8
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

crypto: algifaead - Revert to operating out-of-place

1 / 5
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
9.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

An attacker can leverage sudo's -R (--chroot) option to run arbitrary commands as root, even if they are not listed in the sudoers file. Sudo versions 1.9.14 to 1.9.17 inclusive are affected.

1 / 4
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
EPSS
23.44%
Input Validation, Double Free, Use After Free
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A flaw was found in the OpenSSH package. For each ping packet the SSH server receives, a pong packet is allocated in a memory buffer and stored in a queue of packages. It is only freed when the server/client key exchange has finished. A malicious client may keep sending such packages, leading to an uncontrolled increase in memory consumption on the server side. Consequently, the server may become unavailable, resulting in a denial of service attack.

1 / 36
Source: F5
First published (updated )
Severity
6.8
EPSS
10.06%
Input Validation, Double Free, Use After Free
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

A vulnerability was found in OpenSSH when the VerifyHostKeyDNS option is enabled. A machine-in-the-middle attack can be performed by a malicious machine impersonating a legit server. This issue occurs due to how OpenSSH mishandles error codes in specific conditions when verifying the host key. For an attack to be considered successful, the attacker needs to manage to exhaust the client's memory resource first, turning the attack complexity high.

1 / 35
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
8.1
EPSS
71.47%
Race Condition, Input Validation, Integer Overflow, Buffer Overflow
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A security regression (CVE-2006-5051) was discovered in OpenSSH's server (sshd). There is a race condition which can lead sshd to handle some signals in an unsafe manner. An unauthenticated, remote attacker may be able to trigger it by failing to authenticate within a set time period.

1 / 36
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
EPSS
0.37%
Buffer Overflow
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Chromium: CVE-2023-7024 Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC

1 / 4
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
Input Validation
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Accessibility. A privacy issue was addressed with improved private data redaction for log entries.

1 / 16
Source: Apple
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Input Validation
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A memory corruption vulnerability was addressed with improved locking. This issue is fixed in iOS 17.1.2 and iPadOS 17.1.2, macOS Sonoma 14.1.2, Safari 17.1.2. Processing web content may lead to arbitrary code execution. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been exploited against versions of iOS before iOS 16.7.1.

1 / 17
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
9.6
EPSS
5.21%
Integer Overflow
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Chromium: CVE-2023-6345 Integer overflow in Skia

1 / 4
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
EPSS
90.74%
XSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Last updated 21 August 2024

1 / 5
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

HTTP/2 Rapid reset attack The HTTP/2 protocol allows clients to indicate to the server that a previous stream should be canceled by sending a RSTSTREAM frame. The protocol does not require the client and server to coordinate the cancellation in any way, the client may do it unilaterally. The client may also assume that the cancellation will take effect immediately when the server receives the RSTSTREAM frame, before any other data from that TCP connection is processed.

Abuse of this feature is called a Rapid Reset attack because it relies on the ability for an endpoint to send a RSTSTREAM frame immediately after sending a request frame, which makes the other endpoint start working and then rapidly resets the request. The request is canceled, but leaves the HTTP/2 connection open.

The HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack built on this capability is simple: The client opens a large number of streams at once as in the standard HTTP/2 attack, but rather than waiting for a response to each request stream from the server or proxy, the client cancels each request immediately.

The ability to reset streams immediately allows each connection to have an indefinite number of requests in flight. By explicitly canceling the requests, the attacker never exceeds the limit on the number of concurrent open streams. The number of in-flight requests is no longer dependent on the round-trip time (RTT), but only on the available network bandwidth.

In a typical HTTP/2 server implementation, the server will still have to do significant amounts of work for canceled requests, such as allocating new stream data structures, parsing the query and doing header decompression, and mapping the URL to a resource. For reverse proxy implementations, the request may be proxied to the backend server before the RSTSTREAM frame is processed. The client on the other hand paid almost no costs for sending the requests. This creates an exploitable cost asymmetry between the server and the client.

Multiple software artifacts implementing HTTP/2 are affected. This advisory was originally ingested from the swift-nio-http2 repo advisory and their original conent follows.

swift-nio-http2 specific advisory swift-nio-http2 is vulnerable to a denial-of-service vulnerability in which a malicious client can create and then reset a large number of HTTP/2 streams in a short period of time. This causes swift-nio-http2 to commit to a large amount of expensive work which it then throws away, including creating entirely new Channels to serve the traffic. This can easily overwhelm an EventLoop and prevent it from making forward progress.

swift-nio-http2 1.28 contains a remediation for this issue that applies reset counter using a sliding window. This constrains the number of stream resets that may occur in a given window of time. Clients violating this limit will have their connections torn down. This allows clients to continue to cancel streams for legitimate reasons, while constraining malicious actors.

1 / 8
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
EPSS
29.61%
Buffer Overflow, Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Chromium: CVE-2023-5217 Heap buffer overflow in vp8 encoding in libvpx

1 / 10
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Buffer Overflow, Input Validation, Race Condition, Use After Free
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Airport. A permissions issue was addressed with improved redaction of sensitive information.

1 / 100
Source: Apple
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
Buffer Overflow
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A buffer overflow was discovered in the GNU C Library's dynamic loader ld.so while processing the GLIBCTUNABLES environment variable. This issue could allow a local attacker to use maliciously crafted GLIBCTUNABLES environment variables when launching binaries with SUID permission to execute code with elevated privileges.

1 / 6
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Buffer Overflow, Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Chromium: CVE-2023-4863 Heap buffer overflow in WebP

1 / 8
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
EPSS
34.86%
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Chromium: CVE-2023-4762 Type Confusion in V8

1 / 4
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
3.9
Buffer Overflow, Path Traversal
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

A fully compromised ESXi host can force VMware Tools to fail to authenticate host-to-guest operations, impacting the confidentiality and integrity of the guest virtual machine.

1 / 5
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Chromium: CVE-2023-3079 Type Confusion in V8

1 / 4
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203