Where
AND
-Infinity
0
Severity
6.3
EPSS
0.10%
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Dear Linux Developers,

We're reaching out to you as part of the disclosure process of our research.

In our research, which we will present at IEEE Security & Privacy in May 2024, we found that attackers can not only create TCP-spoofed connections (which was already known), but can also reliably transmit IP-spoofed data over such connections. This has security implications for applications that rely on TCP endpoint IP addresses, such as firewalling or host-based authentication (e.g., SMTP/SPF, of DBs).

We basically discovered two TCP spoofing primitives. First, attackers can bruteforce the server-chosen send window by acknowledging data that was never sent (what we call "ghost ACKs"; see Figure 3 in the paper). Second, we show that there are side channels that allow the attacker to leak the otherwise-secret server-chosen initial sequence number (ISN). One of these side channels leverages TCP SYN cookies.

We believe that the TCP/IP stack can take countermeasures to prevent such attacks, or at least make them harder. For example, we think that TCP endpoints should ignore ghost ACKs, and have some ideas to randomize the TCP backlog queue to prevent the SYN cookie side channel.

At the same time, we have disclosed our findings to the IETF folks and hope that they have helpful feedback for us.

1 / 5
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
6.8
EPSS
0.04%
Race Condition
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sched/membarrier: reduce the ability to hammer on sysmembarrier

On some systems, sysmembarrier can be very expensive, causing overall slowdowns for everything. So put a lock on the path in order to serialize the accesses to prevent the ability for this to be called at too high of a frequency and saturate the machine.

1 / 8
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVE-2019-1000020 libarchive version commit 5a98dcf8a86364b3c2c469c85b93647dfb139961 onwards (version v2.8.0 onwards) contains a CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') vulnerability in ISO9660 parser, archivereadsupportformatiso9660.c, readCE()/parserockridge() that can result in DoS by infinite loop. This attack appears to be exploitable via the victim opening a specially crafted ISO9660 file. CVE-2019-1000019 libarchive version commit bf9aec176c6748f0ee7a678c5f9f9555b9a757c1 onwards (release v3.0.2 onwards) contains a CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability in 7zip decompression, archivereadsupportformat7zip.c, headerbytes() that can result in a crash (denial of service). This attack appears to be exploitable via the victim opening a specially crafted 7zip file.

1 / 4
Source: F5
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVE-2019-1000020 libarchive version commit 5a98dcf8a86364b3c2c469c85b93647dfb139961 onwards (version v2.8.0 onwards) contains a CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') vulnerability in ISO9660 parser, archivereadsupportformatiso9660.c, readCE()/parserockridge() that can result in DoS by infinite loop. This attack appears to be exploitable via the victim opening a specially crafted ISO9660 file. CVE-2019-1000019 libarchive version commit bf9aec176c6748f0ee7a678c5f9f9555b9a757c1 onwards (release v3.0.2 onwards) contains a CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability in 7zip decompression, archivereadsupportformat7zip.c, headerbytes() that can result in a crash (denial of service). This attack appears to be exploitable via the victim opening a specially crafted 7zip file.

1 / 4
Source: F5
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Buffer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Calling Buffer.fill() or Buffer.alloc() with some parameters can lead to a hang which could result in a Denial of Service.

1 / 4
Source: Node.js
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

An improper link resolution flaw can occur while extracting an archive leading to changing modes, times, access control lists, and flags of a file outside of the archive. An attacker may provide a malicious archive to a victim user, who would trigger this flaw when trying to extract the archive. A local attacker may use this flaw to gain more privileges in a system.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
8.5
Command Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

When running in Appliance mode, a command injection vulnerability exists in an undisclosed iControl REST and BIG-IP TMOS Shell (tmsh) command that may allow an authenticated attacker with administrator role privileges to execute arbitrary system commands. A successful exploit can allow the attacker to cross a security boundary.

1 / 2
Source: F5
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Null Pointer Dereference
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

In libarchive 3.6.1, the software does not check for an error after calling calloc function that can return with a NULL pointer if the function fails, which leads to a resultant NULL pointer dereference or, in some cases, even arbitrary code execution.

Upstream patch: https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/commit/fd180c36036df7181a64931264732a10ad8cd024

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Integer Overflow, Buffer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Last updated 13 November 2024

1 / 6
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
Divide by Zero
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

In Qt before 5.15.14, 6.0.x through 6.2.x before 6.2.9, and 6.3.x through 6.5.x before 6.5.1, QtSvg QSvgFont munitsPerEm initialization is mishandled.

1 / 3
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

An issue was discovered in Qt before 5.15.14, 6.x before 6.2.9, and 6.3.x through 6.5.x before 6.5.1. Qt Network incorrectly parses the strict-transport-security (HSTS) header, allowing unencrypted connections to be established, even when explicitly prohibited by the server. This happens if the case used for this header does not exactly match.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Input Validation, SSRF
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Apache HTTP Server is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by a flaw in the modrewrite. By sending a specially crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause unsafe RewriteRules to unexpectedly setup URL's to be handled by modproxy.

1 / 5
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Last updated 31 October 2024

1 / 5
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
9.1
Command Injection
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Apache HTTP Server contains an improper escaping of output vulnerability in modrewrite that allows an attacker to map URLs to filesystem locations that are permitted to be served by the server but are not intentionally/directly reachable by any URL, resulting in code execution or source code disclosure.

1 / 6
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Null Pointer Dereference
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Apache. This is a vulnerability in open source code and Apple Software among the affected projects. The CVE-ID was assigned by a third party. Learn more about the issue and CVE-ID at cve.org.

1 / 4
Source: Apple
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CVE-2024-38474 Substitution encoding issue in modrewrite in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.59 and earlier allows attacker to execute scripts in directories permitted by the configuration but not directly reachable by any URL or source disclosure of scripts meant to only to be executed as CGI. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.60, which fixes this issue. Some RewriteRules that capture and substitute unsafely will now fail unless rewrite flag "UnsafeAllow3F" is specified. CVE-2024-38475 Improper escaping of output in modrewrite in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.59 and earlier allows an attacker to map URLs to filesystem locations that are permitted to be served by the server but are not intentionally/directly reachable by any URL, resulting in code execution or source code disclosure. Substitutions in server context that use a backreferences or variables as the first segment of the substitution are affected. Some unsafe RewiteRules will be broken by this change and the rewrite flag "UnsafePrefixStat" can be used to opt back in once ensuring the substitution is appropriately constrained.

1 / 5
Source: F5
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
Infoleak
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

A fundamental design flaw within the RADIUS protocol has been proven to be exploitable, compromising the integrity in the RADIUS Access-Request process. The attack allows a malicious user to modify packets in a way that would be indistinguishable to a RADIUS client or server. To be successful, the attacker must have the ability to inject themselves between the client and server.

1 / 6
Source: FortiGuard
First published (updated )
Severity
6.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Accounts. The issue was addressed with improved checks.

1 / 10
Source: Apple
First published (updated )
Severity
4.4
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

All actively supported release lines of Node.js are impacted by this flaw.

Node.js TSC member Сковорода Никита Андреевич (Nikita Skovoroda / @ChALkeR) discovered an OOB write in Buffer that can be used to write to memory outside of a Buffer's memory space. This can corrupt unrelated Buffer objects or cause the Node.js process to crash.

When used with UCS-2 encoding (recognized by Node.js under the names 'ucs2', 'ucs-2', 'utf16le' and 'utf-16le'), Buffer#write() can be abused to write outside of the bounds of a single Buffer. Writes that start from the second-to-last position of a buffer cause a miscalculation of the maximum length of the input bytes to be written.

All previous versions of Node.js 6.x (LTS "Boron") are vulnerable

All previous versions of Node.js 8.x (LTS "Carbon") are vulnerable

All previous versions of Node.js 10.x (Current) are vulnerable

Original post is included below

1 / 5
Source: Node.js
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
Command Injection, OS Command Injection, Race Condition, Buffer Overflow, Input Validation
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Accessibility. A privacy issue was addressed with improved private data redaction for log entries.

1 / 41
Source: Apple
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
SQL Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

SQLite3 from 3.6.0 to and including 3.27.2 is vulnerable to heap out-of-bound read in the rtreenode() function when handling invalid rtree tables.

1 / 3
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

A flaw was found in Node.js before 6.15.0 and 8.14.0. An HTTP request splitting. If Node.js can be convinced to use unsanitized user-provided Unicode data for the path option of an HTTP request, then data can be provided which will trigger a second, unexpected, and user-defined HTTP request to made to the same server.

References: https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/november-2018-security-releases/

1 / 5
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
Input Validation, Buffer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Last updated 25 August 2025

1 / 2
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
6.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

On BIG-IP systems, undisclosed traffic can cause data corruption and unauthorized data modification in protocols which do not have message integrity protection.

1 / 2
Source: F5
First published (updated )
Severity
7.4
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Accounts. The issue was addressed with improved checks.

1 / 10
Source: Apple
First published (updated )
Severity
4.3
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Last updated 31 July 2024

1 / 3
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Use After Free, Double Free
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A use-after-free vulnerability was found in libarchive in RAR decoder. A crafted archive could cause the application to crash.

Upstream issue:

https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/pull/1105

Upstream patch:

https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/commit/bfcfe6f04ed20db2504db8a254d1f40a1d84eb28

1 / 4
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Double Free, Use After Free
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A double free vulnerability was found in libarchive in RAR decoder. A crafted archive could cause the application to crash.

Upstream issue:

https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/pull/1105

Upstream patch:

https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/pull/1105/commits/021efa522ad729ff0f5806c4ce53e4a6cc1daa31

1 / 4
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: do not accept ACK of bytes we never sent This patch is based on a detailed report and ideas from Yepeng Pan and Christian Rossow. ACK seq validation is currently following RFC 5961 5.2 guidelines: The ACK value is considered acceptable only if it is in the range of ((SND.UNA - MAX.SND.WND) <= SEG.ACK <= SND.NXT). All incoming segments whose ACK value doesn't satisfy the above condition MUST be discarded and an ACK sent back. It needs to be noted that RFC 793 on page 72 (fifth check) says: "If the ACK is a duplicate (SEG.ACK < SND.UNA), it can be ignored. If the ACK acknowledges something not yet sent (SEG.ACK > SND.NXT) then send an ACK, drop the segment, and return". The "ignored" above implies that the processing of the incoming data segment continues, which means the ACK value is treated as acceptable. This mitigation makes the ACK check more stringent since any ACK < SND.UNA wouldn't be accepted, instead only ACKs that are in the range ((SND.UNA - MAX.SND.WND) <= SEG.ACK <= SND.NXT) get through. This can be refined for new (and possibly spoofed) flows, by not accepting ACK for bytes that were never sent. This greatly improves TCP security at a little cost. I added a Fixes: tag to make sure this patch will reach stable trees, even if the 'blamed' patch was adhering to the RFC. tp->bytesacked was added in linux-4.2 Following packetdrill test (courtesy of Yepeng Pan) shows the issue at hand: 0 socket(..., SOCKSTREAM, IPPROTOTCP) = 3 +0 setsockopt(3, SOLSOCKET, SOREUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0 +0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0 +0 listen(3, 1024) = 0 // ---------------- Handshake ------------------- // // when window scale is set to 14 the window size can be extended to // 65535 (2^14) = 1073725440. Linux would accept an ACK packet // with ack number in (ServerISN+1-1073725440. ServerISN+1) // ,though this ack number acknowledges some data never // sent by the server. +0 < S 0:0(0) win 65535 +0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <...> +0 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 65535 +0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4 // For the established connection, we send an ACK packet, // the ack packet uses ack number 1 - 1073725300 + 2^32, // where 2^32 is used to wrap around. // Note: we used 1073725300 instead of 1073725440 to avoid possible // edge cases. // 1 - 1073725300 + 2^32 = 3221241997 // Oops, old kernels happily accept this packet. +0 < . 1:1001(1000) ack 3221241997 win 65535 // After the kernel fix the following will be replaced by a challenge ACK, // and prior malicious frame would be dropped. +0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1001

First published (updated )
Severity
4.2
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

HTTP Response splitting in multiple modules in Apache HTTP Server allows an attacker that can inject malicious response headers into backend applications to cause an HTTP desynchronization attack. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.59, which fixes this issue.

First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203