Where
AND
AND
-Infinity
0
Severity
5.3
Infoleak
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

A fundamental design flaw within the RADIUS protocol has been proven to be exploitable, compromising the integrity in the RADIUS Access-Request process. The attack allows a malicious user to modify packets in a way that would be indistinguishable to a RADIUS client or server. To be successful, the attacker must have the ability to inject themselves between the client and server.

1 / 6
Source: FortiGuard

Remedy

Disable the use of RADIUS/UDP and RADIUS/TCP - instead RADIUS/TLS or RADIUS/DTLS should be used.

Remedy

TBD

Remedy

The best way to address this issue is by using encrypted and authenticated channels that offer modern cryptographic security guarantees. Configure an alternate authentication mechanism if you are using RADIUS with a CHAP or PAP authentication protocol. PAN-OS provides the following alternate RADIUS authentication mechanisms: PEAP-MSCHAPv2 (default), PEAP with GTC, and EAP-TTLS with PAP. For more information, please see https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/11-1/pan-os-admin/authentication/configure-radius-authentication. In addition, instead of using RADIUS, you can configure an alternate authentication mechanism using one of the options described here: https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/11-1/pan-os-admin/authentication. If you are a Prisma Access customer using a RADIUS configuration with PAP or CHAP in your profile and have not applied one of the changes described above, please reach out to TAC/CS to schedule an upgrade window. PAN-OS 9.1.19, PAN-OS 10.1.14, PAN-OS 10.2.10, PAN-OS 11.0.7, PAN-OS 11.1.3, and all later PAN-OS versions add a new feature to enforce an authentication check in RADIUS. This new feature is disabled by default to match the existing behavior. To enable this feature, run the following commands: > set auth radius-require-msg-authentic yes To confirm that the setting was correctly enabled, run the following command: > show auth radius-require-msg-authentic If set correctly, the response will say "yes". This setting is persistent across reboots. No ‘commit’ is required for this to take effect. Please note that this feature requires that the RADIUS server has been updated to support the new protocol changes, as detailed in https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/456537. If your RADIUS authentication breaks when radius-require-msg-authentic is set to yes, please work with your RADIUS server vendor for support with the RADIUS server upgrade process.
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C

A use of potentially Dangerous Function vulnerability [CWE-676] in FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager API may allow an authenticated attacker to cause a system hang via multiple specially crafted HTTP requests causing crashes. This happens if internal locks are aligned, which is out of control of the attacker.

1 / 2
Source: FortiGuard

Remedy

Upgrade to FortiAnalyzer version 8.0.0 or above Upgrade to FortiAnalyzer version 7.6.5 or above Upgrade to FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.9 or above Upgrade to FortiWeb version 8.0.3 or above Upgrade to FortiWeb version 7.6.7 or above Upgrade to FortiManager version 8.0.0 or above Upgrade to FortiManager version 7.6.5 or above Upgrade to FortiManager version 7.4.9 or above Upgrade to upcoming FortiVoice version 8.0.0 or above Upgrade to upcoming FortiVoice version 7.4.2 or above Upgrade to upcoming FortiSandbox version 5.2.0 or above Upgrade to FortiSandbox version 5.0.6 or above
First published (updated )
Severity
5.2
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C

A use of potentially Dangerous Function vulnerability [CWE-676] in FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager API may allow an authenticated attacker to cause a system hang via multiple specially crafted HTTP requests causing crashes. This happens if internal locks are aligned, which is out of control of the attacker.

First published (updated )
Advisory
FG-IR-26-137
Severity
6.5
Path Traversal
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:O/RC:C

An improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in FortiAnalyzer, FortiAnalyzer Cloud, FortiManager and FortiManager Cloud may allow a privileged attacker to delete files from the underlying filesystem via crafted CLI requests.

1 / 2
Source: FortiGuard

Remedy

Upgrade to FortiManager Cloud version 7.6.5 or above Upgrade to FortiManager Cloud version 7.4.8 or above Upgrade to FortiManager version 7.6.5 or above Upgrade to FortiManager version 7.4.8 or above Upgrade to FortiAnalyzer version 7.6.5 or above Upgrade to FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.8 or above Upgrade to FortiAnalyzer Cloud version 7.6.5 or above Upgrade to FortiAnalyzer Cloud version 7.4.8 or above
First published (updated )
Severity
6.8
SQL Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:O/RC:C

An improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL injection') [CWE-89] in FortiAnalyzer, FortiAnalyzer Cloud, FortiManager and FortiManager Cloud may allow an authenticated privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted requests.

First published (updated )
Advisory
FG-IR-26-111
Severity
5.4
Path Traversal
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:O/RC:C

An improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in FortiAnalyzer, FortiAnalyzer Cloud, FortiManager and FortiManager Cloud may allow a privileged attacker to delete files from the underlying filesystem via crafted CLI requests.

First published (updated )
Advisory
FG-IR-26-120
Severity
6.9
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:W/RC:C

A improper certificate validation vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 7.0 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 6.4 all versions, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiManager 7.2 all versions, FortiManager 7.0 all versions, FortiManager 6.4 all versions may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to view confidential information via a man in the middle [MiTM] attack.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE

Remedy

Upgrade to upcoming FortiAnalyzer version 8.0.0 or above Upgrade to FortiAnalyzer version 7.6.5 or above Upgrade to FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.9 or above Upgrade to upcoming FortiManager version 8.0.0 or above Upgrade to FortiManager version 7.6.5 or above Upgrade to FortiManager version 7.4.9 or above
First published (updated )
Severity
6.4
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:W/RC:C

An Inclusion of Undocumented Features [CWE-1242] in FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer CLI may allow a remote authenticated read-only admin with CLI access to escalate their privilege via use of a hidden command.

First published (updated )
Advisory
FG-IR-26-081
Severity
6.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:U/RC:C

An authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel vulnerability [CWE-288] in FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer multifactor authentication may allow an attacker with knowledge of the admins password to bypass multifactor authentication checks via submitting multiple crafted requests.

First published (updated )
Advisory
FG-IR-26-090
Severity
6.3
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:W/RC:C

An improper certificate validation [CWE-295] vulnerability in the FortiManager GUI may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to view confidential information via a man in the middle [MiTM] attack.

First published (updated )
Advisory
FG-IR-26-078
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:O/RC:C

A use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability [CWE-134] in FortiAnalyzer, FortiAnalyzer Cloud, FortiManager and FortiManager Cloud fazsvcd daemon may allow a remote privileged attacker with admin profile to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests.

First published (updated )
Advisory
FG-IR-26-092
Severity
4.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:F/RL:U/RC:C

A insertion of sensitive information into sent data vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, FortiMail 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, FortiMail 7.0 all versions, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, FortiManager 7.4.1 through 7.4.3, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.3, FortiNDR 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, FortiNDR 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiNDR 7.2 all versions, FortiNDR 7.1 all versions, FortiNDR 7.0 all versions, FortiNDR 1.5 all versions, FortiOS 7.6.0, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, FortiOS 7.0.0 through 7.0.15, FortiOS 6.4.0 through 6.4.15, FortiOS 6.2 all versions, FortiOS 6.0 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.1 all versions, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions, FortiProxy 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, FortiProxy 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, FortiProxy 7.0 all versions, FortiProxy 2.0 all versions, FortiProxy 1.2 all versions, FortiProxy 1.1 all versions, FortiProxy 1.0 all versions, FortiRecorder 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, FortiRecorder 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, FortiTester 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, FortiTester 7.3 all versions, FortiTester 7.2 all versions, FortiTester 7.1 all versions, FortiTester 7.0 all versions, FortiTester 4.2 all versions, FortiVoice 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, FortiVoice 6.4.0 through 6.4.9, FortiVoice 6.0.7 through 6.0.12, FortiWeb 7.6.0, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, FortiWeb 7.2 all versions, FortiWeb 7.0 all versions, FortiWeb 6.4 all versions allows attacker to disclose sensitive information via specially crafted packets.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE

Remedy

Upgrade to FortiManager Cloud version 7.4.4 or above Upgrade to FortiTester version 7.6.0 or above Upgrade to FortiTester version 7.4.3 or above Upgrade to FortiNDR version 7.6.2 or above Upgrade to FortiNDR version 7.4.9 or above Upgrade to FortiManager version 7.6.2 or above Upgrade to FortiManager version 7.4.4 or above Upgrade to FortiPAM version 1.5.0 or above Upgrade to FortiPAM version 1.4.0 or above Fortinet remediated this issue in FortiSASE version 24.3.b and hence customers do not need to perform any action. Upgrade to FortiOS version 7.6.1 or above Upgrade to FortiOS version 7.4.5 or above Upgrade to FortiOS version 7.2.9 or above Upgrade to FortiOS version 7.0.16 or above Upgrade to FortiOS version 6.4.16 or above Upgrade to FortiRecorder version 7.2.2 or above Upgrade to FortiRecorder version 7.0.5 or above Upgrade to FortiProxy version 7.4.5 or above Upgrade to FortiProxy version 7.2.11 or above Upgrade to FortiMail version 7.6.0 or above Upgrade to FortiMail version 7.4.3 or above Upgrade to FortiMail version 7.2.7 or above Upgrade to FortiWeb version 7.6.1 or above Upgrade to FortiWeb version 7.4.5 or above Upgrade to FortiVoice version 7.2.0 or above Upgrade to FortiVoice version 7.0.5 or above Upgrade to FortiVoice version 6.4.10 or above
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:X/RC:C

An Improper Output Neutralization for Logs vulnerability [CWE-117] in FortiAnalyzer version 7.6.1 and below, version 7.4.5 and below, version 7.2.8 and below, version 7.0.13 and below and FortiManager version 7.6.1 and below, version 7.4.5 and below, version 7.2.8 and below, version 7.0.12 and below may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to pollute the logs via crafted login requests.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE

Remedy

Please upgrade to FortiAnalyzer version 7.6.2 or above Please upgrade to FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.6 or above Please upgrade to FortiAnalyzer version 7.2.9 or above Please upgrade to FortiAnalyzer version 7.0.14 or above Please upgrade to FortiManager version 7.6.2 or above Please upgrade to FortiManager version 7.4.6 or above Please upgrade to FortiManager version 7.2.9 or above Please upgrade to FortiManager version 7.0.14 or above
First published (updated )
Severity
5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:X/RC:C

An Improper Output Neutralization for Logs vulnerability [CWE-117] in FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to pollute the logs via crafted login requests.

First published (updated )
Advisory
FG-IR-24-453
Severity
5.9
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H/E:X/RL:O/RC:X

CVE-2025-26466A flaw was found in the OpenSSH package. For each ping packet the SSH server receives, a pong packet is allocated in a memory buffer and stored in a queue of packages. It is only freed when the server/client key exchange has finished. A malicious client may keep sending such packages, leading to an uncontrolled increase in memory consumption on the server side. Consequently, the server may become unavailable, resulting in a denial of service attack.

First published (updated )
Advisory
FG-IR-25-122

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203