Where
AND
-Infinity
0
Severity
10
Code Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Summary

Langflow's built-in Python interpreter components — PythonREPLComponent (Python Interpreter) and the legacy PythonREPLToolComponent (Python REPL Tool) — executed arbitrary user- or model-supplied Python code inside flows without effective sandboxing. Because the code ran in-process with the privileges of the Langflow service, any authenticated user who could edit and run a flow could achieve remote code execution and, from there, escalate privileges to superuser (e.g. by opening a database session and flipping issuperuser) or compromise the host.

This issue is fixed as of 1.10.1, with additional hardening through 1.12.3. See Remediation below.

Affected

- Package: langflow (PyPI), and the underlying lfx package that ships the component. - Vulnerable versions: < 1.10.1. - Patched: 1.10.1 (core fix). Upgrade to >= 1.12.3 for the complete hardening series.

Details

The root cause is code injection (CWE-94/CWE-95): the component passed raw input to LangChain's PythonREPL, which is explicitly not a security sandbox.

Two distinct weaknesses existed before 1.10.1:

1. Unrestricted builtins (default deployments). getglobals() built the exec globals from the globalimports allow-list but never set builtins. CPython's exec() then auto-injected the full builtins module, leaving import, open, eval, exec and the whole import machinery reachable regardless of the allow-list — e.g. import("os").system(...) or import("subprocess").checkoutput([...]). This made the "only modules in Global Imports can be used" guarantee false, and it applied even with the default configuration (allowcustomcomponents=True).

2. No server-policy gate (locked-down deployments). Even a deployment hardened with allowcustomcomponents=False could still run interpreter code, because the components did not consult that policy before executing.

Both let an authenticated user run the reported PoC, which opens a DB session and sets issuperuser = True on their account, or writes to the filesystem / runs OS commands with the service's privileges.

PoC (as reported)

1. Authenticate as a normal user. 2. Create a flow with the PythonREPLComponent. 3. Execute Python that imports Langflow internals and elevates the account:

python import asyncio from sqlmodel import select from langflow.services.database.models.user.model import User from langflow.services.deps import sessionscope

async def escalate(): async with sessionscope() as session: stmt = select(User).where(User.username == 'testuser') user = (await session.exec(stmt)).first() if user: user.issuperuser = True session.add(user) await session.commit()

asyncio.run(escalate())

Impact

Any authenticated user could: - Execute arbitrary Python / OS commands with the Langflow service's privileges (RCE). - Escalate their own account to superuser via direct database access. - Read/modify data and configuration, and potentially pivot to the underlying host.

Remediation

Upgrade to Langflow 1.10.1 or later (preferably >= 1.12.3). The interpreter components were hardened with layered, defense-in-depth controls, applied in runpythonrepl() before any code is executed:

- Restricted builtins — getglobals() injects a curated safebuiltins() mapping, removing import, eval, exec, compile, open, input, globals/locals/vars, getattr/setattr, etc. (#13397) - AST validation — validatecodesafety() rejects inline import/from ... import, dunder/escape-gadget attribute access (class, subclasses, globals, frame/traceback introspection) and format-string dunder traversal. (#13397) - Server-policy gate — ensurecodeexecutionenabled() refuses to run when allowcustomcomponents=False or blockcodeinterpretercomponents=True, and fails closed if the settings stack cannot be resolved. (#13700 — this advisory — and #14375) - Allow-listed module proxies — imported modules are exposed via a proxy that blocks reaching sys.modules["os"] through a module's transitive import graph. (#15198) - Optional hardware isolation — configure LANGFLOWSANDBOXBACKEND to run interpreter code in an isolated microVM instead of in-process. (#14400)

Upstream fix references: #13397, #13700 (carries this GHSA), #14375, #14400, #15198.

Hardening recommendations for operators

- Keep Langflow updated (>= 1.12.3). - For locked-down deployments, set LANGFLOWALLOWCUSTOMCOMPONENTS=false (or LANGFLOWBLOCKCODEINTERPRETERCOMPONENTS=true) to disable the interpreter entirely. - For deployments that must run untrusted code, configure LANGFLOWSANDBOXBACKEND for microVM isolation. - Run the Langflow service as an unprivileged user with least-privilege database credentials.

1 / 3
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
10
Code Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows an attacker to read every secret available to the Langflow process, read and modify every flow, conversation, message, file upload, and saved component in the Langflow database, can connect to internal services, abuse cloud metadata endpoints, laterally move to other tenants on the same Langflow instance, and Establish persistence by modifying the public flow's toolcode so normal /api/v1/build/... calls by any user re-execute attacker code at each build.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
8.5
SSRF
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection bypass vulnerability in the API Request component. An authenticated attacker with low-level privileges (flow author role) can bypass SSRF protections by enabling the followredirects parameter and supplying a public URL that redirects to internal/localhost addresses. The vulnerability exists because the application validates only the initial URL but does not re-validate redirect destinations. This allows attackers to access internal HTTP services, localhost endpoints, cloud metadata services, and private network resources that should be unreachable when SSRF protection is enabled. Successful exploitation can lead to disclosure of sensitive information including credentials, tokens, internal API responses, and administrative panel data.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
7.1
SSRF, Race Condition
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the URL component ( src/lfx/src/lfx/components/datasource/url.py ) due to a Time-of-Check/Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition that can be exploited via DNS rebinding.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203