Where
-Infinity
0
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact

An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger unbounded memory growth on the timestamp authority server.

This vulnerability exists because the global wrapMetrics middleware records the raw HTTP request path (r.URL.Path) and raw HTTP request method (r.Method) as Prometheus labels for latency and request count metric vectors. Since this middleware runs before standard routing occurs, it executes for all incoming requests, including those for unmatched paths (yielding 404 responses) or arbitrary request methods. The Prometheus library registers a new, permanent time-series entry for every distinct label combination. An attacker can continuously issue requests containing random paths (e.g., /api/v1/timestamp/<uuid>) or random HTTP methods to exhaust system memory.

Patches

This issue has been patched by limiting the metric label values to a strict allowlist of expected paths (/ping, /api/v1/timestamp, /api/v1/timestamp/certchain) and expected HTTP methods (GET, POST, HEAD, OPTIONS). Unrecognized paths or methods are normalized to a static string ("unrecognized").

Users should update to version v2.0.7 or later.

Workarounds

1. Block or drop incoming requests with invalid HTTP methods or unknown request paths at a reverse proxy or load balancer before they reach the timestamp authority server. 2. Configure rate-limiting on the public interface to prevent remote attackers from issuing millions of unique requests in a short duration.

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
5.5
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Authorization bypass via certificate bag manipulation in sigstore/timestamp-authority verifier

An authorization bypass vulnerability exists in sigstore/timestamp-authority verifier (timestamp-authority/v2/pkg/verification): VerifyTimestampResponse function correctly verifies the certificate chain but when the TSA specific constraints are verified in VerifyLeafCert, the first non-CA certificate from the PKCS#7 certificate bag is used instead of the leaf certificate from the certificate chain. An attacker can exploit this by prepending a forged certificate to the certificate bag while the message is signed with an authorized key. The library validates the signature using the one certificate but performs authorization checks on the another, allowing an attacker to bypass some authorization controls.

This vulnerability does not apply to timestamp-authority service, only to users of timestamp-authority/v2/pkg/verification package.

This vulnerability does not apply to sigstore-go even though it is a user of timestamp-authority/v2/pkg/verification: Providing TSACertificate option to VerifyTimestampResponse fully mitigates the issue.

Patches

The issue will be fixed in timestamp-authority 2.0.6

Workarounds

Users of VerifyTimestampResponse can use the TSACertificate option to specify the exact certificate they expect to be used: this fully mitigates the issue.

References

This issue was found after reading CVE-2026-33753 / GHSA-3xxc-pwj6-jgrj (originally reported by @Jaynornj and @Pr00fOf3xpl0it)

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact

Excessive memory allocation

Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string.

As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). Relevant weakness: CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)

Patches

Upgrade to v2.0.3.

Workarounds

There are no workarounds with the service itself. If the service is behind a load balancer, configure the load balancer to reject excessively large requests.

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203