A vulnerability in the NuPoint Unified Messaging (NPM) component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP2 (9.8.2.12) could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct a path traversal attack due to insufficient input validation. A successful exploit could allow unauthorized access, enabling the attacker to view, corrupt, or delete users' data and system configurations.

Mitel MiCollab contains a path traversal vulnerability that could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to read local files within the system due to insufficient input sanitization. This vulnerability can be chained with CVE-2024-41713, which allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server.

The API Interface of the AWV (Audio, Web and Video Conferencing) component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP1 FP2 (9.8.1.201) could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct SQL injection due to insufficient sanitization of user input. A successful exploit could allow an attacker with knowledge of specific details to access non-sensitive user provisioning information and execute arbitrary SQL database commands.

A vulnerability in the AWV (Audio, Web, and Video) Conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP1 FP2 (9.8.1.201) could allow an unauthenticated attacker to perform unauthorized data-access attacks due to missing authentication mechanisms. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to access and delete sensitive information.

A vulnerability in the AWV (Audio, Web and Video Conferencing) component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP1 FP2 (9.8.1.201) could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct a SQL injection attack due to insufficient sanitization of user input. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to access non-sensitive user provisioning information and execute arbitrary SQL database commands.

A vulnerability in the Web Conferencing Component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8.1.5 could allow an authenticated attacker to conduct a command injection attack, due to insufficient validation of user input. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system within the context of the user.

A vulnerability in the Web Interface component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP1 (9.8.1.5) and MiVoice Business Solution Virtual Instance (MiVB SVI) through 1.0.0.27 could allow an authenticated attacker to conduct a command injection attack, due to insufficient parameter sanitization. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges within the context of the system.

A vulnerability in the Desktop Client of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110, and MiVoice Business Solution Virtual Instance (MiVB SVI) 1.0.0.25, could allow an authenticated attacker to conduct a privilege escalation attack due to improper file validation. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to run arbitrary code with elevated privileges.

A vulnerability in the AWV (Audio, Web and Video Conferencing) component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP1 FP2 (9.8.1.201) could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct a CRLF injection attack due to inadequate encoding of user input in URLs. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to perform a phishing attack.

A vulnerability in the Desktop Client of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110, and MiVoice Business Solution Virtual Instance (MiVB SVI) 1.0.0.25, could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct a command injection attack due to insufficient parameter sanitization. A successful exploit requires user interaction and could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary scripts.

A vulnerability in the web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to conduct a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack due to insufficient validation of user input. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary scripts.

A vulnerability in the Suite Applications Services component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to conduct a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack due to insufficient validation of user input. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary scripts.

A vulnerability in the web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to conduct a SQL Injection attack due to insufficient validation of user input. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary database and management operations.

A vulnerability in the Suite Applications Services component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to conduct a SQL Injection attack due to insufficient validation of user input. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary database and management operations.

A vulnerability in the NuPoint Unified Messaging (NPM) component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP1 FP2 (9.8.1.201) could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct a path traversal attack, due to insufficient input validation. A successful exploit could allow unauthorized access, enabling the attacker to view, corrupt, or delete users' data and system configurations.

A vulnerability in the NuPoint Messenger (NPM) component of Mitel MiCollab through version 9.8 SP1 (9.8.1.5) could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privilege to conduct a privilege escalation attack due to the execution of a resource with unnecessary privileges. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges.

A vulnerability in the web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.6.2.9 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to download a shared file via a crafted request - including the exact path and filename - due to improper authentication control. A successful exploit could allow access to sensitive information.

The web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.6.0.13 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary scripts due to improper authorization controls. A successful exploit could allow remote code execution within the context of the application.

A vulnerability in the MiCollab Client server component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.5.0.101 could allow an authenticated attacker to conduct a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack due to insufficient restriction of URL parameters. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to leverage connections and permissions available to the host server.

A vulnerability in the MiCollab Client API of Mitel MiCollab through 9.5.0.101 could allow an authenticated attacker to modify their profile parameters due to improper authorization controls. A successful exploit could allow the authenticated attacker to impersonate another user's name.

A vulnerability in the web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.5.0.101 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to upload malicious files. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code within the context of the application.

A vulnerability in the MiCollab Client API of Mitel MiCollab 9.1.3 through 9.5.0.101 could allow an authenticated attacker to modify their profile parameters due to improper authorization controls. A successful exploit could allow the authenticated attacker to control another extension number.

A vulnerability has been identified in MiCollab and MiVoice Business Express that may allow a malicious actor to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information and services, cause performance degradations or a denial of service condition on the affected system.

The Mitel MiCollab application before 9.1.332 for iOS could allow an unauthorized user to access restricted files and folders due to insufficient access control. An exploit requires a rooted iOS device, and (if successful) could allow an attacker to gain access to sensitive information,

A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the web conferencing component of the Mitel MiCollab application before 9.0.15 for Android could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attack due to insufficient validation in the file upload interface. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary scripts.

A vulnerability in the web conference chat component of MiCollab, versions 7.3 PR6 (7.3.0.601) and earlier, and 8.0 (8.0.0.40) through 8.0 SP2 FP2 (8.0.2.202), and MiVoice Business Express versions 7.3 PR3 (7.3.1.302) and earlier, and 8.0 (8.0.0.40) through 8.0 SP2 FP1 (8.0.2.202), could allow creation of unauthorized chat sessions, due to insufficient access controls. A successful exploit could allow execution of arbitrary commands.

MiCollab 7.3 PR2 (7.3.0.204) and earlier, 7.2 (7.2.2.13) and earlier, and 7.1 (7.1.0.57) and earlier and MiCollab AWV 6.3 (6.3.0.103), 6.2 (6.2.2.8), 6.1 (6.1.0.28), 6.0 (6.0.0.61), and 5.0 (5.0.5.7) have a Command Execution Vulnerability. Successful exploit of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary system commands.

An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of Load & Store instructions (a commonly used performance optimization).

It relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code as well as the fact that memory read from address to which a recent memory write has occurred may see an older value and subsequently cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire).

As a result, an unprivileged attacker could use this flaw to read privileged memory by conducting targeted cache side-channel attacks.

A missing bounds check was found in the way OpenSSL handled TLS heartbeat extension packets. This flaw could be used to reveal up to 64k of memory from a connected client or server.

Only 1.0.1 releases of OpenSSL are affected including 1.0.1f (and 1.0.2 betas)

The following upstream commit introduced TLS/DTLS heatbeat support and also this issue:

http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=4817504