Where
-Infinity
0
Severity
7

In Eclipse Jetty versions 12.0.0 to 12.0.16 included, an HTTP/2 client can specify a very large value for the HTTP/2 settings parameter SETTINGSMAXHEADERLISTSIZE. The Jetty HTTP/2 server does not perform validation on this setting, and tries to allocate a ByteBuffer of the specified capacity to encode HTTP responses, likely resulting in OutOfMemoryError being thrown, or even the JVM process exiting.

First published (updated )
Severity
4

There exists a security vulnerability in Jetty's DosFilter which can be exploited by unauthorized users to cause remote denial-of-service (DoS) attack on the server using DosFilter. By repeatedly sending crafted requests, attackers can trigger OutofMemory errors and exhaust the server's memory finally.

First published (updated )
Severity
4

There exists a security vulnerability in Jetty's ThreadLimitHandler.getRemote() which can be exploited by unauthorized users to cause remote denial-of-service (DoS) attack. By repeatedly sending crafted requests, attackers can trigger OutofMemory errors and exhaust the server's memory.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Jetty PushSessionCacheFilter can be exploited by unauthenticated users to launch remote DoS attacks by exhausting the server’s memory.

Patches https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/pull/9715 https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/pull/9716

Workarounds The session usage is intrinsic to the design of the PushCacheFilter. The issue can be avoided by: + not using the PushCacheFilter. Push has been deprecated by the various IETF specs and early hints responses should be used instead. + reducing the reducing the idle timeout on unauthenticated sessions will reduce the time such session stay in memory. + configuring a session cache to use session passivation, so that sessions are not stored in memory, but rather in a database or file system that may have significantly more capacity than memory.

References https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/pull/10756 https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/pull/10755

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
4

Jetty is a Java based web server and servlet engine. An HTTP/2 SSL connection that is established and TCP congested will be leaked when it times out. An attacker can cause many connections to end up in this state, and the server may run out of file descriptors, eventually causing the server to stop accepting new connections from valid clients. The vulnerability is patched in 9.4.54, 10.0.20, 11.0.20, and 12.0.6.

https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/issues/11256 https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-rggv-cv7r-mw98

First published (updated )

[I've seen multiple news articles & blogs in the wake of the coordinated disclosure today, but no postings here yet, so lets start fixing that.]

Google, Cloudflare, AWS, and others released details today of a protocol-level issue in HTTP/2 being exploited in recent months for denial-of-service attacks:

https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/how-it-works-the-novel-http2-rapid-reset-ddos-attack https://blog.cloudflare.com/technical-breakdown-http2-rapid-reset-ddos-attack/ https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/how-aws-protects-customers-from-ddos-events/

This attack works via the multiplexed streams feature of HTTP/2, in which the client repeatedly makes a request for a new stream, and then immediately sends a RSTSTREAM frame to cancel them, resulting in the server doing lots of extra work to set up and tear down the streams, while not hitting any server-side limit on a maximum number of active streams per connection.

CVE-2023-44487 was issued to track this issue across implementations: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44487

A script to check for affected implemenations has been posted at: https://github.com/bcdannyboy/CVE-2023-44487

Information I've found so far on open source implementations (most via the current listings in the CVE) include:

- Apache httpd: https://chaos.social/@icing/111210915918780532

- caddy: https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/issues/5877

- envoy: https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/pull/30055

- golang: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/63417 https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/iNNxDTCjZvo

- h2o: https://github.com/h2o/h2o/security/advisories/GHSA-2m7v-gc89-fjqf https://github.com/h2o/h2o/pull/3291

- haproxy: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/2312

- hyper: https://seanmonstar.com/post/730794151136935936/hyper-http2-rapid-reset-unaffected

- jetty: https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/10679 https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-12.0.2 https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-11.0.17 https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-10.0.17 https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-9.4.53.v20231009

- netty: https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/58f75f665aa81a8cbcf6ffa74820042a285c5e61

- nghttp2: https://github.com/nghttp2/nghttp2/pull/1961 https://github.com/nghttp2/nghttp2/releases/tag/v1.57.0

- nginx: https://www.nginx.com/blog/http-2-rapid-reset-attack-impacting-f5-nginx-products/ https://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-devel/2023-October/S36Q5HBXR7CAIMPLLPRSSSYR4PCMWILK.html

- nodejs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/50121

- proxygen: https://github.com/facebook/proxygen/pull/466

- swift-nio-http2: https://forums.swift.org/t/swift-nio-http2-security-update-cve-2023-44487-http-2-dos/67764

- tomcat: https://tomcat.apache.org/security-11.html#FixedinApacheTomcat11.0.0-M12 https://tomcat.apache.org/security-10.html#FixedinApacheTomcat10.1.14 https://tomcat.apache.org/security-9.html#FixedinApacheTomcat9.0.81 https://tomcat.apache.org/security-8.html#FixedinApacheTomcat8.5.94

-- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith () oracle com Oracle Solaris Engineering - https://blogs.oracle.com/solaris

First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A flaw was found in the Jetty-server package. This flaw allows an attacker to send invalid requests, causing a denial of service in the Jetty Server.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
4

A vulnerability was found in keycloak, where on using lower case HTTP headers (via cURL) we can bypass our Gatekeeper. Lower case headers are also accepted by some webservers (e.g. Jetty). This means there is no protection when we put a Gatekeeper in front of a Jetty server and use lowercase headers.

References: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-14090

First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
XSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Eclipse Jetty is vulnerable to cross-site scripting, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using the error messages to inject malicious script into a Web page which would be executed in a victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting Web site, once the page is viewed. An attacker could use this vulnerability to steal the victim's cookie-based authentication credentials.

1 / 2
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

JSP Dump and Session Dump Servlet XSS in jetty before 6.1.22.

First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Infoleak
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Dump Servlet information leak in jetty before 6.1.22.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

WebApp JSP Snoop page XSS in jetty though 6.1.21.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Cookie Dump Servlet stored XSS vulnerability in jetty though 6.1.20.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
Infoleak
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Eclipse Jetty could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by a flaw when configured for showing a listing of directory contents. By sending a specially-crafted request, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Eclipse Jetty is vulnerable to a denial of service, caused by the additional CPU and memory allocations required to handle changed settings. By sending either large SETTINGs frames container containing many settings, or many small SETTINGs frames, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause a denial of service.

1 / 2
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Eclipse Jetty could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information. An attacker could send a specially-crafted URL request to the java.nio.file.InvalidPathException function using an invalid parameter to cause an error message to be returned containing the full installation path. An attacker could use this information to launch further attacks against the affected system.

1 / 2
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
XSS
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Eclipse Jetty is vulnerable to HTTP request smuggling, caused by a flaw in the HTTP/1.x Parser. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to poison the web cache, bypass web application firewall protection, and conduct XSS attacks.

1 / 2
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Eclipse Jetty could allow a remote attacker to hijack a user's session, caused by a flaw in the FileSessionDataStore. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain access to another user's session.

1 / 2
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

The path normalization mechanism in PathResource class in Eclipse Jetty 9.3.x before 9.3.9 on Windows allows remote attackers to bypass protected resource restrictions and other security constraints via a URL with certain escaped characters, related to backslashes.

First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Infoleak
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

The exception handling code in Eclipse Jetty before 9.2.9.v20150224 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via illegal characters in an HTTP header, aka JetLeak.

First published (updated )
EOL
Dec 7, 2020
Support Ends
Dec 7, 2020

End of life: 12/7/2020, End of support: 12/7/2020, Latest version: 9.3.30.v20211001

First published (updated )
EOL
Dec 7, 2020
Support Ends
Dec 7, 2020

End of life: 12/7/2020, End of support: 12/7/2020, Latest version: 9.3.30.v20211001

First published (updated )
EOL
Mar 8, 2018
Support Ends
Mar 8, 2018

End of life: 3/8/2018, End of support: 3/8/2018, Latest version: 9.2.30.v20200428

First published (updated )
EOL
Mar 8, 2018
Support Ends
Mar 8, 2018

End of life: 3/8/2018, End of support: 3/8/2018, Latest version: 9.2.30.v20200428

First published (updated )
EOL
Dec 31, 2014
Support Ends
Dec 31, 2014

End of life: 12/31/2014, End of support: 12/31/2014, Latest version: 9.1.6.v20160112

First published (updated )
EOL
Dec 31, 2014
Support Ends
Dec 31, 2014

End of life: 12/31/2014, End of support: 12/31/2014, Latest version: 9.1.6.v20160112

First published (updated )
EOL
Dec 31, 2013
Support Ends
Dec 31, 2013

End of life: 12/31/2013, End of support: 12/31/2013, Latest version: 9.0.7.v20131107

First published (updated )
EOL
Dec 31, 2013
Support Ends
Dec 31, 2013

End of life: 12/31/2013, End of support: 12/31/2013, Latest version: 9.0.7.v20131107

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Jetty 8.1.0.RC2 and earlier computes hash values for form parameters without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by sending many crafted parameters.

First published (updated )
EOL
Dec 31, 2014
Support Ends
Dec 31, 2014

End of life: 12/31/2014, End of support: 12/31/2014, Latest version: 8.2.0.v20160908

First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203