Where
AND
-Infinity
0
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A flaw was found in the way the BMPImageReader class implementation in the ImageIO component of OpenJDK handled memory allocations when processing uncompressed BMP images. A specially-crafted BMP image with a small size could cause a Java application to allocate an excessive amount of memory and possibly terminate on out-of-memory condition.

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
Null Pointer Dereference
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A flaw was found in the SSL logger implementation in the JSSE component of OpenJDK. A malicious client could cause a Java application acting as TLS server to raise an unexpected exception during TLS handshake.

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
6.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

It was discovered that the Kerberos protocol implementation in the Libraries component of OpenJDK did not correctly report subject principals when using Kerberos Constrained Delegation. This could lead to the use of wrong Kerberos tickets.

1 / 2
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

A flaw was found in the way the Keytool component of OpenJDK handled X.509 certificates with validity period ending too far in the future, after year 9999. When such certificates were imported into a keystore, they could cause corruption of the keystore.

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A flaw was found in the way the RTFReader class implementation in the Swing component of OpenJDK handled style keyword parameters. A specially crafted Rich Text Format (RTF) file could cause a Java application using RTFReader to allocate an excessive ammount of memory and possibly terminate on out-of-memory condition.

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

An inifinte loop flaw was found in the HttpsServer class implementation in the JSSE component of OpenJDK. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to cause a Java application implementing HTTPS server functionality to loop during the TLS session closing and consume an excessive amount of CPU time.

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A flaw was found in the way the RTFParser class implementation in the Swing component of OpenJDK handled memory allocations. A specially crafted Rich Text Format (RTF) file could cause a Java application using RTFParser to allocate an excessive amount of memory and possibly terminate on out-of-memory condition.

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
4.8
CRLF Injection
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

A CRLF injection flaw was found in the Lightweight HTTP Server component of OpenJDK. The HttpServer implementation did not restrict the use of CR and LF characters in values for HTTP headers, possibly allowing HTTP response splitting attacks.

1 / 4
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A regular expression denial of service flaw was found in the Concurrency component of OpenJDK. The use of overly complex regular expressions in java.utils.Scanner could cause a high CPU usage when Scanner was used on parse certain inputs.

1 / 4
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A flaw was found in the way the HashMap and the HashSet classes implementations in the Utility component of OpenJDK validated the load factor value during deserialization. A specially crafted serialized data stream could cause a Java application to allocate an excessive amount of memory and possibly terminate on out-of-memory condition when deserialized.

1 / 2
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A flaw was found in the way the TLS implementation in the JSSE component of OpenJDK re-used single null TLS sessions for new TLS connections. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to impact availability of a Java application providing TLS server.

1 / 4
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
4.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Last updated 24 July 2024

1 / 5
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
4.8
XSS
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

A flaw was found in Undertow. A regression in the fix for CVE-2020-10687 was found. HTTP request smuggling related to CVE-2017-2666 is possible against HTTP/1.x and HTTP/2 due to permitting invalid characters in an HTTP request. This flaw allows an attacker to poison a web-cache, perform an XSS attack, or obtain sensitive information from request other than their own. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

A vulnerability was found in OpenSSL 1.0.2. When an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSLshutdown() twice, OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. This difference in behaviour can be detected by a remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Also the application must call SSLshutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). AEAD ciphersuites are not impacted. This issue does not impact OpenSSL 1.1.1 or 1.1.0.

Upstream bug: https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20190226.txt

Upstream Patch: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e9bbefbf0f24c57645e7ad6a5a71ae649d18ac8e

1 / 5
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
Infoleak
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

It was discovered that the XMLEntityManager class implementation in the JAXP component of OpenJDK did not properly perform access checks. A Java application using SAX XML parser in certain configuration could be tricked into disclosing information when parsing a specially-crafted XML file.

1 / 2
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A flaw was found in the way the XMLEntityScanner and XML11EntityScanner classes in the JAXP component of OpenJDK handled and normalized newlines in XML entities. A specially-crafted XML document could cause a Java application to enter an infinite loop when parsed.

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
5.5
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Duplicate Advisory This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-2c6g-pfx3-w7h8. This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description In RESTEasy the insecure File.createTempFile() is used in the DataSourceProvider, FileProvider and Mime4JWorkaround classes which creates temp files with insecure permissions that could be read by a local user.

1 / 5
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
XSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

jsoup is a Java HTML parser, built for HTML editing, cleaning, scraping, and cross-site scripting (XSS) safety. jsoup may incorrectly sanitize HTML including javascript: URL expressions, which could allow XSS attacks when a reader subsequently clicks that link. If the non-default SafeList.preserveRelativeLinks option is enabled, HTML including javascript: URLs that have been crafted with control characters will not be sanitized. If the site that this HTML is published on does not set a Content Security Policy, an XSS attack is then possible. This issue is patched in jsoup 1.15.3. Users should upgrade to this version. Additionally, as the unsanitized input may have been persisted, old content should be cleaned again using the updated version. To remediate this issue without immediately upgrading: - disable SafeList.preserveRelativeLinks, which will rewrite input URLs as absolute URLs - ensure an appropriate Content Security Policy is defined. (This should be used regardless of upgrading, as a defence-in-depth best practice.)

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

A flaw was found in ActiveMQ Artemis management API from version 2.7.0 up until 2.12.0, where a user inadvertently stores passwords in plaintext in the Artemis shadow file (etc/artemis-users.properties file) when executing the resetUsers operation. A local attacker can use this flaw to read the contents of the Artemis shadow file.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
XSS
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Impact If a Content-Length header is present in the original HTTP/2 request, the field is not validated by Http2MultiplexHandler as it is propagated up. This is fine as long as the request is not proxied through as HTTP/1.1. If the request comes in as an HTTP/2 stream, gets converted into the HTTP/1.1 domain objects (HttpRequest, HttpContent, etc.) via Http2StreamFrameToHttpObjectCodec and then sent up to the child channel's pipeline and proxied through a remote peer as HTTP/1.1 this may result in request smuggling.

In a proxy case, users may assume the content-length is validated somehow, which is not the case. If the request is forwarded to a backend channel that is a HTTP/1.1 connection, the Content-Length now has meaning and needs to be checked.

An attacker can smuggle requests inside the body as it gets downgraded from HTTP/2 to HTTP/1.1. A sample attack request looks like:

POST / HTTP/2 :authority:: externaldomain.com Content-Length: 4

asdfGET /evilRedirect HTTP/1.1 Host: internaldomain.com

Users are only affected if all of this is true: HTTP2MultiplexCodec or Http2FrameCodec is used Http2StreamFrameToHttpObjectCodec is used to convert to HTTP/1.1 objects These HTTP/1.1 objects are forwarded to another remote peer.

Patches This has been patched in 4.1.60.Final

Workarounds The user can do the validation by themselves by implementing a custom ChannelInboundHandler that is put in the ChannelPipeline behind Http2StreamFrameToHttpObjectCodec.

References Related change to workaround the problem: https://github.com/Netflix/zuul/pull/980

1 / 5
First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Impact The content-length header is not correctly validated if the request only use a single Http2HeaderFrame with the endStream set to to true. This could lead to request smuggling if the request is proxied to a remote peer and translated to HTTP/1.1

This is a followup of https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-wm47-8v5p-wjpj which did miss to fix this one case.

Patches This was fixed as part of 4.1.61.Final

Workarounds Validation can be done by the user before proxy the request by validating the header.

1 / 5
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Impact

Netty currently just skips control chars when these are present at the beginning / end of the header name. We should better fail fast as these are not allowed by the spec and could lead to HTTP request smuggling.

Failing to do the validation might cause netty to "sanitize" header names before it forward these to another remote system when used as proxy. This remote system can't see the invalid usage anymore and so not do the validation itself.

1 / 5
First published (updated )
Severity
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

GStreamer before 1.18.4 may perform an out-of-bounds read when handling certain ID3v2 tags.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
Null Pointer Dereference
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signaturealgorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signaturealgorithmscert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Last updated 18 August 2025

1 / 3
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
4.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Last updated 18 August 2025

1 / 3
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
4.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Last updated 18 August 2025

1 / 3
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Last updated 18 August 2025

1 / 3
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
6.8
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

It was discovered that the Kerberos implementation in the Security component of OpenJDK used RSA-MD5 checksum in Ticket Granting Service (TGS) requests even though MD5 algorithm is no longer considered safe for such use case. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to manipulate TGS requests.

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
4.8
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

A flaw was found in the URL class implementation in the Networking component of OpenJDK. An incorrect check to determine if a URLStreamHandler is builtin or not can lead to incorrect URL normalization in certain cases.

1 / 4
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203