Where
-Infinity
0
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact

When typographer: true is enabled, specially crafted Markdown can cause quadratic processing time in the smartquotes rule, potentially leading to denial of service in applications processing untrusted input.

Many opening double quotes followed by unmatched closing single quotes cause repeated scans of the entire opener stack. The same issue occurs with the quote types reversed.

The default configuration (typographer: false) is not affected, but this option is enabled with high probability.

Reproduction

js import MarkdownIt from 'markdown-it' import { performance } from 'node:perfhooks'

const md = new MarkdownIt({ typographer: true })

for (const k of [2000, 4000, 8000, 16000, 32000]) { const input = '"a '.repeat(k) + "b' ".repeat(k) const start = performance.now() md.render(input) console.log(input.length, (performance.now() - start).toFixed(1), 'ms') }

Result:

|input size|time| |-|-| |12000|18ms| |24000|47ms| |48000|115ms| |96000|428ms| |192000|1586ms|

Patches

Fixed in 15.0.2 and 14.3.2.

Workarounds

Disable typography with typographer: false, or disable only the smartquotes rule:

js md.disable('smartquotes')

1 / 3
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

SAPUI5 (and OpenUI5) packages use outdated 3rd party libraries with known security vulnerabilities. When markdown-it encounters special malformed input, it fails to terminate properly, resulting in an infinite loop. This Denial of Service via infinite loop causes high CPU usage and system unresponsiveness due to a blocked processing thread. This vulnerability has no impact on confidentiality or integrity but has a high impact on system availability.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.5
EPSS
0.01%
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L/E:P

Versions of the package markdown-it from 13.0.0 and before 14.1.1 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) due to the use of the regex /\+$/ in the linkify function. An attacker can supply a long sequence of characters followed by a non-matching character, which triggers excessive backtracking and may lead to a denial-of-service condition.

First published (updated )
Severity
3.7
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Summary

With html: true, markdown-it takes quadratic time to parse repeated unterminated HTML constructs inside a paragraph. This affects HTML comments (<!--), processing instructions (<?), declarations (<!A), and CDATA sections (<![CDATA[).

An attacker-controlled input of a few hundred kilobytes can block the Node.js event loop for seconds or tens of seconds. The default configuration has HTML disabled, but the commonmark preset enables it.

The issue was reported against the published markdown-it@15.0.2 package on Node.js 20 and reproduced on the current source with Node.js 24.16.0.

Details

src/rulesinline/text.ts treats < as a terminator, causing the inline parser to attempt the HTML rule at successive HTML construct openers.

With HTML enabled, src/rulesinline/htmlinline.ts applies an anchored regular expression to the remaining input:

js const match = state.src.slice(pos).match(HTMLTAGRE)

The comment, processing instruction, declaration, and CDATA alternatives in src/common/htmlre.ts scan the remaining input for their respective terminators: -->, ?>, >, and ]]>.

When the terminator is absent, matching fails. Parsing eventually reaches the next opener and scans an overlapping suffix again. Repeating this across the paragraph produces quadratic total work. For these inputs, the problem is repeated scanning across separate matches.

The payload must reach inline parsing. Prefixing it with x keeps it inside a paragraph. Starting a line directly with one of these constructs instead invokes HTML block parsing, which does not exhibit the same repeated inline scans for these payloads.

The existing unclosed <!-- test in test/markdown-it/pathological.test.mjs already contains a reproducer:

js '</' + '<!--'.repeat(100000)

However, it runs with default options, where HTML is disabled.

A fix should avoid repeated searches for absent terminators across all four affected alternatives, for example by caching failed searches on the inline state. Fixing only the comment alternative leaves the other three cases affected. Regression coverage should exercise all four with html: true.

The original report was submitted by @JarLob. It credits the GitHub Security Lab Taskflow Agent as part of the GitHub Secure Open Source Fund.

Proof of concept

Install the affected package in an empty directory:

sh npm install markdown-it@15.0.2

Save the following as poc.mjs and run node poc.mjs:

js import MarkdownIt from 'markdown-it' import { performance } from 'node:perfhooks'

const mdHtml = new MarkdownIt({ html: true }) const mdDefault = new MarkdownIt() const sizes = [8000, 16000, 32000, 64000]

function measure(md, src) { const start = performance.now() md.render(src) return (performance.now() - start).toFixed(1) }

const variants = { comment: '<!--', processing: '<?x', declaration: '<!A', cdata: '<![CDATA[' }

for (const [name, opener] of Object.entries(variants)) { console.log(\n${name}) for (const n of sizes) { const src = 'x ' + opener.repeat(n) console.log({ n, bytes: Buffer.byteLength(src), ms: measure(mdHtml, src) }) } }

const n = sizes.at(-1) const controls = { 'HTML disabled': [mdDefault, 'x ' + '<!--'.repeat(n)], 'Closed comments': [mdHtml, 'x ' + '<!---->'.repeat(n)], 'HTML block': [mdHtml, '<!--'.repeat(n)], 'Plain text': [mdHtml, 'x ' + 'abcd'.repeat(n)] }

for (const [name, [md, src]] of Object.entries(controls)) { console.log({ control: name, ms: measure(md, src) }) }

const repoPayload = '</' + '<!--'.repeat(100000) console.log({ payload: 'Existing pathological test', htmlFalseMs: measure(mdDefault, repoPayload), htmlTrueMs: measure(mdHtml, repoPayload) })

Measurements from the original report on markdown-it@15.0.2, Node.js 20:

| Construct | 8,000 repetitions | 64,000 repetitions | | --- | ---: | ---: | | Comment | 170 ms | 8,799 ms | | Processing instruction | 26 ms | 1,566 ms | | Declaration | 93 ms | 5,628 ms | | CDATA | 119 ms | 4,179 ms |

An eightfold increase in repetitions produces approximately 35–60 times the execution time, consistent with quadratic growth becoming dominant.

For the comment payload at 64,000 repetitions:

- HTML disabled: 25 ms. - Closed comments: 29 ms. - Payload at the start of an HTML block: 1 ms. - Plain text: 1 ms.

The existing pathological-test payload with 100,000 comment openers took 33 ms with HTML disabled and 21,030 ms with HTML enabled. A separate comment payload with 128,000 repetitions, approximately 500 KiB, took 32,847 ms.

Exact timings depend on the runtime and hardware.

Impact

This is an availability issue affecting applications that render attacker-controlled Markdown with html: true, including applications using the commonmark preset.

On Node.js, a synchronous render() call can occupy a CPU core and block the event loop for seconds or tens of seconds, delaying other requests handled by the same process. Repeated submissions can cause denial of service. Browser applications can similarly become unresponsive when rendering on the main thread.

Sanitizing the generated HTML afterwards does not prevent the issue because the expensive processing occurs during Markdown rendering.

The default configuration, with HTML disabled, is unaffected by these payloads. Disabling HTML or limiting input size can reduce exposure while a fix is prepared.

The reported affected release is 15.0.2; the full affected version range has not been established.

1 / 3
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203