Where
-Infinity
0
Severity
10
Code Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

In spring cloud gateway versions prior to 3.1.1+ and 3.0.7+ , applications are vulnerable to a code injection attack when the Gateway Actuator endpoint is enabled, exposed and unsecured. A remote attacker could make a maliciously crafted request that could allow arbitrary remote execution on the remote host.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Infoleak
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

A flaw in netfilter could allow a network-connected attacker to infer openvpn connection endpoint information for further use in traditional network attacks.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Code Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it.

1 / 4
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in the way NSS verifies certificates. That will happen both when client reads the Certificate message from the server or when server is configured to ask for client certificates and then receives one.

Firefox is not vulnerable as it uses the mozilla::pkix for certificate verification. Crucially, NSS fully parses the certificate before any other checks, so disabled signature methods or certificate types don't impact exploitability.

Any TLS and DTLS client that does use NSS built in certificate verification routines is vulnerable as well as any server that has certificate based client authentication enabled.

But the issue is not limited to TLS, any applications that use certificate verification are vulnerable, S/MIME is impacted too.

1 / 4
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Input Validation, SSRF
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

A flaw was found in python-ipaddress. Improper input validation of octal strings in stdlib ipaddress allows unauthenticated remote attackers to perform indeterminate SSRF, RFI, and LFI attacks on many programs that rely on Python stdlib ipaddress. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity and system availability.

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Buffer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Last updated 24 July 2024

1 / 3
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Malicious File Upload
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in xstream, a simple library used to serialize objects to XML and back again. This flaw allows a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host by manipulating the processed input stream. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
XSS, Command Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L

Impact The HTML Cleaner in lxml.html lets certain crafted script content pass through, as well as script content in SVG files embedded using data URIs.

Users that employ the HTML cleaner in a security relevant context should upgrade to lxml 4.6.5.

Patches The issue has been resolved in lxml 4.6.5.

Workarounds None.

References The issues are tracked under the report IDs GHSL-2021-1037 and GHSL-2021-1038.

1 / 5
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
8.5
Code Injection
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in xstream, a simple library used to serialize objects to XML and back again. This flaw allows a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host by manipulating the processed input stream.

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
8.5
Malicious File Upload
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in xstream, a simple library used to serialize objects to XML and back again. This flaw allows a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host by manipulating the processed input stream. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
8.5
Malicious File Upload
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in xstream, a simple library used to serialize objects to XML and back again. This flaw allows a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host by manipulating the processed input stream. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
8.5
Malicious File Upload
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in xstream, a simple library used to serialize objects to XML and back again. This flaw allows a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host by manipulating the processed input stream. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
8.5
Malicious File Upload
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in xstream, a simple library used to serialize objects to XML and back again. This flaw allows a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host by manipulating the processed input stream. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
8.5
Malicious File Upload
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in xstream, a simple library used to serialize objects to XML and back again. This flaw allows a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host by manipulating the processed input stream. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
8.5
Malicious File Upload
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in xstream, a simple library used to serialize objects to XML and back again. This flaw allows a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host by manipulating the processed input stream. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
8.5
Malicious File Upload
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in xstream, a simple library used to serialize objects to XML and back again. This flaw allows a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host by manipulating the processed input stream. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
8.5
SSRF
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in xstream, a simple library used to serialize objects to XML and back again. This flaw allows a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publicly available by manipulating the processed input stream with Java runtime versions 14 to 8. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
8.5
SSRF
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in xstream, a simple library used to serialize objects to XML and back again. This flaw allows a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publicly available by manipulating the processed input stream with Java runtime versions 14 to 8. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
8.5
Malicious File Upload
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in xstream, a simple library used to serialize objects to XML and back again. This flaw allows a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host by manipulating the processed input stream. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
8.5
Malicious File Upload
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in xstream, a simple library used to serialize objects to XML and back again. This flaw allows a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host by manipulating the processed input stream. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
8.1
Use After Free
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A use-after-free flaw was found in the way curl handled TLS session data. The curl versions using the OpenSSL library as their TLS backend could use freed memory after TLS session renegotiation was performed by the OpenSSL library. A malicious TLS server could use this flaw to crash or, possibly, execute arbitrary code with the privileges of a client application using the curl library.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
8.1
Use After Free, Input Validation, Buffer Overflow, Integer Overflow, Race Condition
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in libxml2. A call to the xmlGetID function can return a pointer already freed when parsing an XML document with the XMLPARSEDTDVALID option and without the XMLPARSENOENT option, resulting in a use-after-free issue.

1 / 43
First published (updated )
Severity
8
Buffer Overflow
AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H

A flaw was found in the Linux kernel. A incorrect size check in decodenfsfh() may lead to an overwrite of 2 bytes beyond destination.

References:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210517140244.822185482@linuxfoundation.org/

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
Use After Free
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw in the Linux Kernel found. If unprivileged users can mount FUSE filesystems, then can trigger use after free (UAF) that reads of write() buffers, allowing theft of (partial) /etc/shadow hashes or any other data from filesystem.

FUSE allows the userspace filesystem to specify on FUSEOPEN whether the file should use the normal kernel pagecache for handling read()/write() or just send FUSEREAD/FUSEWRITE requests directly to the userspace filesystem (using the flag FOPENDIRECTIO in fuseopenout::openflags).

In FOPENDIRECTIO mode, fusefilewriteiter() calls fusedirectwriteiter(), which normally calls fusedirectio(), which then imports the write buffer with fusegetuserpages(), which uses iovitergetpages() to grab references to userspace pages instead of actually copying memory.

On the filesystem device side, these pages can then either be read to userspace (via fusedevread()), or splice()d over into a pipe using fusedevspliceread() as pipe buffers with &nostealpipebufops.

This is wrong because after fusedevdoread() unlocks the FUSE request, the userspace filesystem can mark the request as completed, causing write() to return. At that point, the write buffer may be reused for other purposes, and the userspace filesystem should no longer have access to it.

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

An unprivileged write to the file handler flaw in the Linux kernel's control groups and namespaces subsystem was found in the way users have access to some less privileged process that are controlled by cgroups and have higher privileged parent process. It is actually both for cgroup2 and cgroup1 versions of control groups. A local user could use this flaw to crash the system or escalate their privileges on the system.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

An out-of-bounds (OOB) memory access flaw was found in nftfwddupnetdevoffload in net/netfilter/nfdupnetdev.c in netfilter subcomponent in the Linux kernel due to a heap out of bounds write problem. In this flaw, an attacker with a user account on the system to gain access to out-of-bounds memory leads to a system crash or a privilege escalation threat.

Reference:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf.git/commit/?id=b1a5983f56e371046dcf164f90bfaf704d2b89f6 https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/02/21/2

1 / 4
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.15 and versions 5.3.x prior to 5.3.7, a WebFlux application is vulnerable to a privilege escalation: by (re)creating the temporary storage directory, a locally authenticated malicious user can read or modify files that have been uploaded to the WebFlux application, or overwrite arbitrary files with multipart request data.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
Input Validation, Buffer Overflow
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

An out-of-bounds memory write flaw was found in the Linux kernel's joystick devices subsystem in versions before 5.9-rc1, in the way the user calls ioctl JSIOCSBTNMAP. This flaw allows a local user to crash the system or possibly escalate their privileges on the system. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability.

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

An information leak flaw was found in the Linux kernel’s IPv6 implementation in the ipv6selectident in net/ipv6/outputcore.c function. The use of a small hash table in IP ID generation allows a remote attacker to reveal sensitive information.

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

A flaw was found in curl. This flaw lies in the --ssl-reqd option or related settings in libcurl. Users specify this flag to upgrade to TLS when communicating with either IMAP, POP3 or a FTP server. An attacker controlling such servers could return a crafted response which could lead to curl client continue its operation without TLS encryption leading to data being transmitted in clear text over the network. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality.

1 / 5
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203