Where
-Infinity
0
Severity
7
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A deserialization flaw was discovered in Apache Tomcat's use of a FileStore. An attacker can exploit the flaw if all of the following are true: An attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server. The server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore. The PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker-provided object to be deserialized. The attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over. If all these conditions are true, the attacker can use a specifically crafted request to trigger Remote Code Execution through deserialization of the file under their control.

This flaw affects the following Tomcat versions: 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54, and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103.

Upstream commits:

Tomcat 10.0: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/bb33048e3f9b4f2b70e4da2e6c4e34ca89023b1b Tomcat 9.0: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/3aa8f28db7efb311cdd1b6fe15a9cd3b167a2222 Tomcat 8.5: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/ec08af18d0f9ddca3f2d800ef66fe7fd20afef2f Tomcat 7.0: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/53e30390943c18fca0c9e57dbcc14f1c623cfd06

1 / 5
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A flaw was found in the Apache Log4j logging library 2.x. when the logging configuration uses a non-default Pattern Layout with a Context Lookup. Attackers with control over Thread Context Map (MDC) input data can craft malicious input data that contains a recursive lookup and can cause Denial of Service.

1 / 5
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Pivotal Spring Framework is vulnerable to a denial of service, caused by improper handling of range request by the ResourceHttpRequestHandler. By adding a range header with a high number of ranges, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause a denial of service condition.

1 / 3
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
XSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
8.1
Malicious File Upload
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Last updated 25 August 2025

1 / 4
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
XEE
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

A flaw was found in dom4j library. By using the default SaxReader() provided by Dom4J, external DTDs and External Entities are allowed, resulting in a possible XXE.

1 / 4
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
4.8
Path Traversal, Input Validation
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

In Apache Commons IO before 2.7, When invoking the method FileNameUtils.normalize with an improper input string, like "//../foo", or "\\..\foo", the result would be the same value, thus possibly providing access to files in the parent directory, but not further above (thus "limited" path traversal), if the calling code would use the result to construct a path value.

References:

https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/12/1 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-556

1 / 2
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
8.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Vulnerability in the Advanced Networking Option component of Oracle Database Server. Supported versions that are affected are 12.1.0.2, 12.2.0.1 and 19c. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via Oracle Net to compromise Advanced Networking Option. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Advanced Networking Option, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Advanced Networking Option. Note: The July 2021 Critical Patch Update introduces a number of Native Network Encryption changes to deal with vulnerability CVE-2021-2351 and prevent the use of weaker ciphers. Customers should review: "Changes in Native Network Encryption with the July 2021 Critical Patch Update" (Doc ID 2791571.1). CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

First published (updated )
Severity
8.2
Input Validation, SSRF
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Apache Batik 1.13 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the NodePickerPanel. By using a specially-crafted argument, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests.

1 / 3
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
CSRF, Input Validation, SSRF
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

A flaw was found in the Apache Batik library, where it is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery attack (SSRF) via "xlink:href" attributes. This flaw allows an attacker to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system integrity.

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Flaw affecting tomcat 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.52 and 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.9 . The host name verification when using TLS with the WebSocket client was not enabled by default.

Upstream patch:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1833757 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1833759

References:

https://tomcat.apache.org/security-8.html https://tomcat.apache.org/security-9.html

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Pivotal Spring Framework could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system, caused by improper validation of user request. An attacker could send a specially-crafted URL request containing "dot dot" sequences (/../) to configure Spring MVC to serve static resources.

1 / 3
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Pivotal Spring Framework could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain elevated privileges on the system, caused by improper input validation. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges.

1 / 3
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A flaw was found in Spring Framework, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.6, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.17, and older unsupported versions allows applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a regular expression, denial of service attack.

References: https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2018-1257

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Code Injection, Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CVE-2018-1270, which permitted a malicious user to craft a STOMP message that could lead to remote code execution, was not fully addressed in the 4.3.x branch of the Spring Framework.

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Code Injection, Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Pivotal Spring Framework could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by the exposure of STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. By sending a specially-crafted message, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the system.

1 / 4
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in cxf in versions prior to 3.2.11 and 3.3.4. The access token services do not properly validate that an authenticated principal is equal to that of the supplied clientId parameter allowing a malicious client to use an authorization code that has been issued to a different client as their own. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Apache CXF could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by a flaw when ships with OpenId Connect JWK Keys service. By accessing the JWK keystore file, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain the public keys in JWK format, and use this information to launch further attacks against the affected system.

1 / 3
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
4.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

A flaw was found in Apache tomcat. When the default servlet returned a redirect to a directory (e.g. redirecting to /foo/ when the user requested /foo) a specially crafted URL could be used to cause the redirect to be generated to any URI of the attackers choice.

References:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/23134c9b5a23892a205dc140cdd8c9c0add233600f76b313dda6bd75@%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Apache CXF before 3.3.4 and 3.2.11 does not restrict the number of message attachments present in a given message. This leaves open the possibility of a denial of service type attack, where a malicious user crafts a message containing a very large number of message attachments. From the 3.3.4 and 3.2.11 releases, a default limit of 50 message attachments is enforced. This is configurable via the message property "attachment-max-count".

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Command Injection, Code Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in velocity. An attacker, able to modify Velocity templates, may execute arbitrary Java code or run arbitrary system commands with the same privileges as the account running the Servlet container. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.

1 / 5
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.15 and versions 5.3.x prior to 5.3.7, a WebFlux application is vulnerable to a privilege escalation: by (re)creating the temporary storage directory, a locally authenticated malicious user can read or modify files that have been uploaded to the WebFlux application, or overwrite arbitrary files with multipart request data.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
8
XSS
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in springframework in versions prior to 5.0.16, 5.1.13, and 5.2.3. A reflected file download (RFD) attack is possible when a "Content-Disposition" header is set in response to where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
CSRF
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3 are vulnerable to CSRF attacks through CORS preflight requests that target Spring MVC (spring-webmvc module) or Spring WebFlux (spring-webflux module) endpoints. Only non-authenticated endpoints are vulnerable because preflight requests should not include credentials and therefore requests should fail authentication. However a notable exception to this are Chrome based browsers when using client certificates for authentication since Chrome sends TLS client certificates in CORS preflight requests in violation of spec requirements. No HTTP body can be sent or received as a result of this attack.

First published (updated )
Severity
4.8
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A flaw was found in Apache Tomcat. The HTTP header parsing code used an approach to end-of-line (EOL) parsing that allowed some invalid HTTP headers to be parsed as valid. This led to the possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. The highest threat with this vulnerability is system availability.

1 / 5
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

In Apache Batik 1.x before 1.10, when deserializing subclass of AbstractDocument, the class takes a string from the inputStream as the class name which then use it to call the no-arg constructor of the class. Fix was to check the class type before calling newInstance in deserialization.

1 / 2
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Apache Log4j <=2.14.1 JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled (CVE-2021-44228).

1 / 6
Source: FortiGuard

Remedy

As per upstream: - In prior releases confirm that if the JDBC Appender is being used it is not configured to use any protocol other than Java. - Note that only the log4j-core JAR file is impacted by this vulnerability. Applications using only the log4j-api JAR file without the log4j-core JAR file are not impacted by this vulnerability.
First published (updated )
Severity
7.7
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A flaw was found in gson, which is vulnerable to Deserialization of Untrusted Data via the writeReplace() method in internal classes. This issue may lead to availability attacks.

1 / 5
First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Apache CXF is vulnerable to cross-site scripting, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input by the services listing page. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using a specially-crafted URL to execute script in a victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting Web site, once the URL is clicked. An attacker could use this vulnerability to steal the victim's cookie-based authentication credentials.

1 / 3
Source: IBM

Remedy

Mitigate this flaw by disabling the service listing altogether; via setting the "hide-service-list-page" servlet parameter to "true".
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
XEE
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in quartz through version 2.3.0. A XXE attack is possible in the Terracotta Quartz Scheduler using a job description. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.

1 / 3
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203