Where
AND
-Infinity
0
Severity
9.2
OS Command Injection, Code Injection
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Summary The RC endpoint operations/fsinfo is exposed without AuthRequired: true and accepts attacker-controlled fs input. Because rc.GetFs(...) supports inline backend definitions, an unauthenticated attacker can instantiate an attacker-controlled backend on demand. For the WebDAV backend, bearertokencommand is executed during backend initialization, making single-request unauthenticated local command execution possible on reachable RC deployments without global HTTP authentication.

Preconditions

Preconditions for this vulnerability are:

- The rclone remote control API must be enabled, either by the --rc flag or by running the rclone rcd server - The remote control API must be reachable by the attacker - by default rclone only serves the rc to localhost unless the --rc-addr flag is in use - The rc must have been deployed without global RC HTTP authentication - so not using --rc-user/--rc-pass/--rc-htpasswd/etc

Details The root cause consists of the following pieces:

1. operations/fsinfo is not protected with AuthRequired: true 2. operations/fsinfo calls rc.GetFs(...) on attacker-controlled input 3. rc.GetFs(...) supports inline backend creation through object-valued fs 4. WebDAV backend initialization executes bearertokencommand

Relevant code paths:

- fs/operations/rc.go - operations/fsinfo is registered without AuthRequired: true - rcFsInfo() calls rc.GetFs(ctx, in)

- fs/rc/cache.go - GetFs() / GetFsNamed() can parse an object-valued fs - getConfigMap() converts attacker-controlled JSON into a backend config string

- backend/webdav/webdav.go - bearertokencommand is a supported backend option - NewFs(...) calls fetchAndSetBearerToken() when bearertokencommand is set - fetchBearerToken() invokes exec.Command(...)

This creates a practical single-request unauthenticated command-execution primitive on reachable RC servers without global HTTP authentication.

This was alidated on: - current master as of 2026-04-14: bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82 - latest public release tested locally: v1.73.4

This was also validated on a public amd64 Ubuntu host controlled by the tester, using direct host execution (not containerized PoC execution).

PoC Minimal single-request form PoC Start a vulnerable RC server:

bash rclone rcd --rc-addr 127.0.0.1:5572

No --rc-user, no --rc-pass, no --rc-htpasswd.

Then send a single request:

bash curl -sS -X POST http://127.0.0.1:5572/operations/fsinfo \ --data-urlencode "fs=:webdav,url='http://127.0.0.1/',vendor=other,bearertokencommand='/usr/bin/touch /tmp/rclonefsinforcepocmarker':"

Expected result: - HTTP 200 JSON response from operations/fsinfo - /tmp/rclonefsinforcepocmarker is created on the host

Impact This is effectively a single-request unauthenticated command-execution vulnerability on reachable RC deployments without global HTTP authentication.

In practice, command execution in the rclone process context can lead to higher-impact outcomes such as local file read, file write, or shell access, depending on the deployed environment.

Testing performed This was successfully reproduced: - on a local test environment - on a public amd64 Ubuntu host controlled by the tester

On the public host it was confirmed:

- the unauthenticated operations/fsinfo exploit worked - command execution occurred on the host - the issue was reproducible through direct host execution

1 / 3
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203