Where
AND
-Infinity
0
Severity
8.8
Integer Overflow, Buffer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

An integer overflow was found in Redis. Redis 4.0 or newer uses a configurable limit for the maximum supported bulk input size. The default size is 512MB which is a safe value for all platforms. Authenticated Redis users could increase the bulk input size by changing the "proto-max-bulk-len" configuration parameter, leading to heap corruption and potentially remote code execution.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Integer Overflow
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. An integer overflow bug in Redis version 6.0 or newer, could be exploited using the STRALGO LCS command to corrupt the heap and potentially result with remote code execution. This is a result of an incomplete fix by CVE-2021-29477. The problem is fixed in version 6.2.4 and 6.0.14. An additional workaround to mitigate the problem without patching the redis-server executable is to use ACL configuration to prevent clients from using the STRALGO LCS command. On 64 bit systems which have the fixes of CVE-2021-29477 (6.2.3 or 6.0.13), it is sufficient to make sure that the proto-max-bulk-len config parameter is smaller than 2GB (default is 512MB).

First published (updated )
Severity
7.7
Buffer Overflow, Integer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

An integer overflow in the getnum function in luastruct.c in Redis before 6.0.3 allows context-dependent attackers with permission to run Lua code in a Redis session to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly bypass intended sandbox restrictions via a large number, which triggers a stack-based buffer overflow. NOTE: this issue exists because of a CVE-2015-8080 regression.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
Buffer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A heap overflow issue was found in Redis in versions before 5.0.10, before 6.0.9 and before 6.2.0 when using a heap allocator other than jemalloc or glibc's malloc, leading to potential out of bound write or process crash. Effectively this flaw does not affect the vast majority of users, who use jemalloc or glibc malloc.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203