Where
AND
-Infinity
0
Severity
9.8
Buffer Overflow, Integer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A buffer overrun vulnerability was discovered in CGI.escapehtml. This can lead to a buffer overflow when a user passes a very large string (> 700 MB) to CGI.escapehtml on a platform where long type takes 4 bytes, typically, Windows.

1 / 4
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A vulnerability was found in Ruby that allows HTTP header injection. A CGI application using the CGI library may insert untrusted input into the HTTP response header. This issue can allow an attacker to insert a newline character to split a header and inject malicious content to deceive clients.

1 / 5
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A flaw was found in ruby, where the date object was found to be vulnerable to a regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) during the parsing of dates. This flaw allows an attacker to hang a ruby application by providing a specially crafted date string. The highest threat to this vulnerability is system availability.

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
XEE
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

A flaw was found in the way the Ruby REXML library parsed XML documents. Parsing a specially crafted XML document using REXML and writing parsed data back to a new XML document results in creating a document with a different structure. This issue could affect the integrity of processed data in applications using REXML that parse XML documents, write data back to XML, and re-parse them again.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

A flaw was found in Ruby. RubyGems cgi gem could allow a remote attacker to conduct spoofing attacks caused by the mishandling of security prefixes in cookie names in the CGI::Cookie.parse function. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could perform cookie prefix spoofing attacks.

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

An issue was discovered in Ruby through 2.5.8, 2.6.x through 2.6.6, and 2.7.x through 2.7.1. WEBrick, a simple HTTP server bundled with Ruby, had not checked the transfer-encoding header value rigorously. An attacker may potentially exploit this issue to bypass a reverse proxy (which also has a poor header check), which may lead to an HTTP Request Smuggling attack.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Buffer Overflow, Input Validation, Race Condition, Use After Free
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

A buffer overrun vulnerability was found in Ruby. The issue occurs in a conversion algorithm from a String to a Float that causes process termination due to a segmentation fault, but under limited circumstances. This flaw may cause an illegal memory read.

1 / 76
First published (updated )
Severity
7.4
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

An issue was discovered in Ruby through 2.6.7, 2.7.x through 2.7.3, and 3.x through 3.0.1. Net::IMAP does not raise an exception when StartTLS fails with an an unknown response, which might allow man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass the TLS protections by leveraging a network position between the client and the registry to block the StartTLS command, aka a "StartTLS stripping attack."

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
5.8
Infoleak
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

A malicious FTP server can use the PASV response to trick Net::FTP into connecting back to a given IP address and port. This potentially makes Net::FTP extract information about services that are otherwise private and not disclosed (e.g., the attacker can conduct port scans and service banner extractions).

References:

https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2021/07/07/trusting-pasv-responses-in-net-ftp/

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
Infoleak
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

An issue was discovered in Ruby 2.5.x through 2.5.7, 2.6.x through 2.6.5, and 2.7.0. If a victim calls BasicSocket#readnonblock(requestedsize, buffer, exception: false), the method resizes the buffer to fit the requested size, but no data is copied. Thus, the buffer string provides the previous value of the heap. This may expose possibly sensitive data from the interpreter.

First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203