Where
AND
-Infinity
0
Severity
6.5
EPSS
0.81%
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Last updated 24 July 2024

1 / 3
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
4.9
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

An issue was discovered in Squid before 4.15 and 5.x before 5.0.6. Due to incorrect parser validation, it allows a Denial of Service attack against the Cache Manager API. This allows a trusted client to trigger memory leaks that. over time, lead to a Denial of Service via an unspecified short query string. This attack is limited to clients with Cache Manager API access privilege.

1 / 3
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AC:H/AV:N/A:N/C:L/I:N/PR:N/S:U/UI:N

In some configurations, squid allows information disclosure because of an out-of-bounds read in WCCP protocol data. This can be leveraged as part of a chain for remote code execution as nobody.

1 / 2
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A vulnerability was found in squid. Due to improper buffer management Squid is vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack when processing Gopher server responses.

The issue is fixed upstream in 5.6.

References: https://github.com/squid-cache/squid/security/advisories/GHSA-f5cp-6rh3-284w

1 / 2
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

An issue was discovered in Squid before 4.15 and 5.x before 5.0.6. Due to a buffer-management bug, it allows a denial of service. When resolving a request with the urn: scheme, the parser leaks a small amount of memory. However, there is an unspecified attack methodology that can easily trigger a large amount of memory consumption.

1 / 3
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
Input Validation
AC:L/AV:N/A:H/C:N/I:N/PR:L/S:U/UI:N

Due to an input validation bug Squid is vulnerable to a Denial of Service against all clients using the proxy. This problem allows a remote server to perform Denial of Service when delivering HTTP Response messages. The issue trigger is a header which can be expected to exist in HTTP traffic without any malicious intent by the server.

Reference: https://github.com/squid-cache/squid/security/advisories/GHSA-572g-rvwr-6c7f/

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
Integer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

An issue was discovered in Squid before 4.15 and 5.x before 5.0.6. Due to an input-validation bug, it is vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack (against all clients using the proxy). A client sends an HTTP Range request to trigger this.

1 / 3
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

An issue was discovered in Squid before 4.15 and 5.x before 5.0.6. Due to a memory-management bug, it is vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack (against all clients using the proxy) via HTTP Range request processing.

1 / 3
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
Integer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

An issue was discovered in Squid before 4.15 and 5.x before 5.0.6. An integer overflow problem allows a remote server to achieve Denial of Service when delivering responses to HTTP Range requests. The issue trigger is a header that can be expected to exist in HTTP traffic without any malicious intent.

1 / 3
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

An issue was discovered in Squid 4.x before 4.15 and 5.x before 5.0.6. If a remote server sends a certain response header over HTTP or HTTPS, there is a denial of service. This header can plausibly occur in benign network traffic.

1 / 3
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
XSS, Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

An issue was discovered in Squid before 4.13 and 5.x before 5.0.4. Due to incorrect data validation, HTTP Request Smuggling attacks may succeed against HTTP and HTTPS traffic. This leads to cache poisoning. This allows any client, including browser scripts, to bypass local security and poison the proxy cache and any downstream caches with content from an arbitrary source. When configured for relaxed header parsing (the default), Squid relays headers containing whitespace characters to upstream servers. When this occurs as a prefix to a Content-Length header, the frame length specified will be ignored by Squid (allowing for a conflicting length to be used from another Content-Length header) but relayed upstream.

1 / 3
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

An issue was discovered in Squid before 4.13 and 5.x before 5.0.4. Due to incorrect data validation, HTTP Request Splitting attacks may succeed against HTTP and HTTPS traffic. This leads to cache poisoning. This allows any client, including browser scripts, to bypass local security and poison the browser cache and any downstream caches with content from an arbitrary source. Squid uses a string search instead of parsing the Transfer-Encoding header to find chunked encoding. This allows an attacker to hide a second request inside Transfer-Encoding: it is interpreted by Squid as chunked and split out into a second request delivered upstream. Squid will then deliver two distinct responses to the client, corrupting any downstream caches.

1 / 3
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
9.9
XSS, Input Validation
AC:L/AV:N/A:H/C:H/I:H/PR:L/S:C/UI:N

An issue was discovered in http/ContentLengthInterpreter.cc in Squid before 4.12 and 5.x before 5.0.3. A Request Smuggling and Poisoning attack can succeed against the HTTP cache. The client sends an HTTP request with a Content-Length header containing "+\ "-" or an uncommon shell whitespace character prefix to the length field-value.

1 / 3
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Integer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

An issue was discovered in Squid before 5.0.2. A remote attacker can replay a sniffed Digest Authentication nonce to gain access to resources that are otherwise forbidden. This occurs because the attacker can overflow the nonce reference counter (a short integer). Remote code execution may occur if the pooled token credentials are freed (instead of replayed as valid credentials).

1 / 2
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

An issue was discovered in Squid through 4.7. When handling the tag esi:when when ESI is enabled, Squid calls ESIExpression::Evaluate. This function uses a fixed stack buffer to hold the expression while it's being evaluated. When processing the expression, it could either evaluate the top of the stack, or add a new member to the stack. When adding a new member, there is no check to ensure that the stack won't overflow.

1 / 2
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

An issue was discovered in Squid through 4.7. When Squid is parsing ESI, it keeps the ESI elements in ESIContext. ESIContext contains a buffer for holding a stack of ESIElements. When a new ESIElement is parsed, it is added via addStackElement. addStackElement has a check for the number of elements in this buffer, but it's off by 1, leading to a Heap Overflow of 1 element. The overflow is within the same structure so it can't affect adjacent memory blocks, and thus just leads to a crash while processing.

1 / 2
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

An issue was discovered in Squid before 4.12 and 5.x before 5.0.3. Due to use of a potentially dangerous function, Squid and the default certificate validation helper are vulnerable to a Denial of Service when opening a TLS connection to an attacker-controlled server for HTTPS. This occurs because unrecognized error values are mapped to NULL, but later code expects that each error value is mapped to a valid error string.

First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203