In ASQ in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) 1.0.0 through 2.7.8, 2.8.0 through 2.16.0, 3.0.0 through 3.7.20, 3.8.0 through 3.11.8, and 4.0.1 through 4.2.2, mishandling of memory management can lead to remote code execution.

An issue was discovered in Stormshield SNS through 4.2.1. A brute-force attack can occur.

Stormshield SNS with versions before 3.7.18, 3.11.6 and 4.1.6 has a memory-management defect in the SNMP plugin that can lead to excessive consumption of memory and CPU resources, and possibly a denial of service.

In Stormshield Network Security (SNS) before 3.7.25, 3.8.x through 3.11.x before 3.11.13, 4.x before 4.2.10, and 4.3.x before 4.3.5, a flood of connections to the SSLVPN service might lead to saturation of the loopback interface. This could result in the blocking of almost all network traffic, making the firewall unreachable. An attacker could exploit this via forged and properly timed traffic to cause a denial of service.

Stormshield Network Security (SNS) before 4.2.2 allows a read-only administrator to gain privileges via CLI commands.

Stormshield Network Security (SNS) 3.x has an Integer Overflow in the high-availability component.

An issue was discovered in Stormshield SNS before 4.2.3 (when the proxy is used). An attacker can saturate the proxy connection table. This would result in the proxy denying any new connections.

A vulnerability in Stormshield Network Security could allow an attacker to trigger a protection related to ARP/NDP tables management, which would temporarily prevent the system to contact new hosts via IPv4 or IPv6. This affects versions 2.0.0 to 2.7.7, 2.8.0 to 2.16.0, 3.0.0 to 3.7.16, 3.8.0 to 3.11.4, and 4.0.0 to 4.1.5. Fixed in versions 2.7.8, 3.7.17, 3.11.5, and 4.2.0.

An issue was discovered in Stormshield SNS 3.8.0. Authenticated Stored XSS in the admin login panel leads to SSL VPN credential theft. A malicious disclaimer file can be uploaded from the admin panel. The resulting file is rendered on the authentication interface of the admin panel. It is possible to inject malicious HTML content in order to execute JavaScript inside a victim's browser. This results in a stored XSS on the authentication interface of the admin panel. Moreover, an unsecured authentication form is present on the authentication interface of the SSL VPN captive portal. Users are allowed to save their credentials inside the browser. If an administrator saves his credentials through this unsecured form, these credentials could be stolen via the stored XSS on the admin panel without user interaction. Another possible exploitation would be modification of the authentication form of the admin panel into a malicious form.