Where
AND
-Infinity
0
Severity
9.1
EPSS
0.04%
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

In Mbed TLS 3.3.0 through 3.5.2 before 3.6.0, a malicious client can cause information disclosure or a denial of service because of a stack buffer over-read (of less than 256 bytes) in a TLS 1.3 server via a TLS 3.1 ClientHello.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

In MbedTLS 3.3.0 before 3.6.4, mbedtlslmsimportpublickey does not check that the input buffer is at least 4 bytes before reading a 32-bit field, allowing a possible out-of-bounds read on truncated input. Specifically, an out-of-bounds read in mbedtlslmsimportpublickey allows context-dependent attackers to trigger a crash or limited adjacent-memory disclosure by supplying a truncated LMS (Leighton-Micali Signature) public-key buffer under four bytes. An LMS public key starts with a 4-byte type indicator. The function mbedtlslmsimportpublickey reads this type indicator before validating the size of its input.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Mbed TLS v3.3.0 up to 3.6.5 and 4.0.0 allows Algorithm Downgrade.

First published (updated )
Severity
4.9
AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N

In MbedTLS 3.3.0 before 3.6.4, mbedtlslmsverify may accept invalid signatures if hash computation fails and internal errors go unchecked, enabling LMS (Leighton-Micali Signature) forgery in a fault scenario. Specifically, unchecked return values in mbedtlslmsverify allow an attacker (who can induce a hardware hash accelerator fault) to bypass LMS signature verification by reusing stale stack data, resulting in acceptance of an invalid signature. In mbedtlslmsverify, the return values of the internal Merkle tree functions createmerkleleafvalue and createmerkleinternalvalue are not checked. These functions return an integer that indicates whether the call succeeded or not. If a failure occurs, the output buffer (Tccandidaterootnode) may remain uninitialized, and the result of the signature verification is unpredictable. When the software implementation of SHA-256 is used, these functions will not fail. However, with hardware-accelerated hashing, an attacker could use fault injection against the accelerator to bypass verification.

First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203