Where
AND
-Infinity
0
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N

A WebFlux server application that processes multipart requests creates temp files for parts larger than 10 K. Under some circumstances, temp files may remain not deleted after the request is fully processed. This allows an attacker to consume available disk space.

Older, unsupported versions are also affected.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Pivotal Spring Framework could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system, caused by improper validation of user request. An attacker could send a specially-crafted URL request containing "dot dot" sequences (/../) to configure Spring MVC to serve static resources.

1 / 3
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Pivotal Spring Security and Spring Framework could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions, caused by the failure to consider URL path parameters when processing security constraints. By adding a URL path parameter with special encodings, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass access restrictions and gain access to the server and obtain sensitive information.

1 / 3
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A flaw was found in Spring Framework, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.6, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.17, and older unsupported versions allows applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a regular expression, denial of service attack.

References: https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2018-1257

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
SSRF
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Due to incorrect host parsing, applications that rely on UriComponentsBuilder to parse and validate an externally provided URL string may be exposed to a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to Multipart request smuggling attacks.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A vulnerability in Spring Expression Language (SpEL) evaluation logic allows for arbitrary zero-argument method invocation, even within restricted or read-only contexts, which may allow an attacker to invoke unintended application logic.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
XSS, Code Injection
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Spring MVC applications which accept user-supplied values in the cssClass, cssErrorClass, or cssStyle attributes of JSP form tags allow arbitrary HTML/JavaScript code injection, potentially resulting in a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application which configures a mapping for "/" where the view name is not explicitly specified allows an attacker to craft a link resulting in a 302 redirect to an arbitrary external host via the redirect: prefix.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to Path Traversal attacks when resolving static resources.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to Information Disclosure attacks when resolving static resources.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
4.2
XSS
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

A WebFlux application with a compromised subdomain (for example, compromised via cross-site scripting (XSS)) is vulnerable to an escalation attack exchanging a known session ID for that of an authenticated user.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Use of Java scripting engine enabled (e.g. JRuby, Jython) template views in Spring MVC and Spring WebFlux applications can result in disclosure of content from files outside the configured locations for script template views. This issue affects Spring Framework: from 7.0.0 through 7.0.5, from 6.2.0 through 6.2.16, from 6.1.0 through 6.1.25, from 5.3.0 through 5.3.46.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks when resolving static resources.

More precisely, an application can be vulnerable when all the following are true:

the application is using Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux the application is serving static resources from the file system the application is running on a Windows platform

When all the conditions above are met, the attacker can send malicious requests that are slow to resolve and that can keep HTTP connections in use. This can cause a Denial of Service on the application.

First published (updated )
Severity
4.3
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

In Spring Framework versions 5.3.0 - 5.3.38 and older unsupported versions, it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted Spring Expression Language (SpEL) expression that may cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.

Specifically, an application is vulnerable when the following is true:

The application evaluates user-supplied SpEL expressions.

1 / 3
Source: NVD
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

The fix for CVE-2022-22968 made disallowedFields patterns in DataBinder case insensitive. However, String.toLowerCase() has some Locale dependent exceptions that could potentially result in fields not protected as expected.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Spring WebFlux applications are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) attacks when processing multipart requests. Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, 6.2.0 through 6.2.18, 6.1.0 through 6.1.27, 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.8
CSRF, XEE
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

It was found that the Spring MVC SourceHttpMessageConverter processed user-provided XML, and did not expose any property for disabling entity resolution in the XML. A remote attacker could use this flaw to conduct XML External Entity (XXE) attacks on web sites, and read files in the context of the user running the application server. The patch for this flaw disables external entity processing by default, and provides a configuration directive to re-enable it. This flaw is considered to be the result of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-4152.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
6.8
CSRF
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

It was found that Spring MVC processed user-provided XML with JAXB, in combination with a StAX XMLInputFactory, without disabling external entity resolution. A remote attacker could use this flaw to conduct XML External Entity (XXE) attacks on web sites, and read files in the context of the user running the application server. This flaw affects Spring Framework 3.2.x before 3.2.4 and 4.0.0.M1 through 4.0.0.M2.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
6.8
CSRF
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

It was reported [1] that the Spring Framework suffered from several XML External Entity (XXE) flaws:

Versions Affected: - 3.0.0 to 3.2.3 (Spring OXM) - 3.2.0 to 3.2.3 (Spring MVC) - 4.0.0.M1 (Spring OXM) - 4.0.0.M1-4.0.0.M2 (Spring MVC) - Earlier unsupported versions may also be affected

Description: The Spring OXM wrapper did not expose any property for disabling entity resolution when using the JAXB unmarshaller. There are four possible source implementations passed to the unmarshaller: - DOMSource - StAXSource - SAXSource - StreamSource For a DOMSource, the XML has already been parsed by user code and that code is responsible for protecting against XXE. For a StAXSource, the XMLStreamReader has already been created by user code and that code is responsible for protecting against XXE. For SAXSource and StreamSource instances, Spring processed external entities by default thereby creating this vulnerability. The issue was resolved by disabling external entity processing by default and adding an option to enable it for those users that need to use this feature when processing XML from a trusted source.

It was also identified that Spring MVC processed user provided XML with JAXB in combination with a StAX XMLInputFactory without disabling external entity resolution. External entity resolution has been disabled in this case.

Mitigation: Users of affected versions should apply the following mitigation: - Users of 3.x should upgrade to 3.2.4 or later - Users of 4.x should upgrade to 4.0.0.RC1 or later once released Note the Spring OXM issue is fixed in 4.0.0.M2

[1] http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2013/Aug/154

External References:

http://www.gopivotal.com/security/cve-2013-4152 https://github.com/SpringSource/spring-framework/pull/317 https://jira.springsource.org/browse/SPR-10806

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
6.8
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Spring Framework 3.0.0 through 3.0.5, Spring Security 3.0.0 through 3.0.5 and 2.0.0 through 2.0.6, and possibly other versions deserialize objects from untrusted sources, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended security restrictions and execute untrusted code by (1) serializing a java.lang.Proxy instance and using InvocationHandler, or (2) accessing internal AOP interfaces, as demonstrated using deserialization of a DefaultListableBeanFactory instance to execute arbitrary commands via the java.lang.Runtime class.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Spring WebFlux applications may be vulnerable to a security bypass when using the Kotlin Router DSL.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
4.3
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

In Spring Framework versions 5.3.0 - 5.3.13, 5.2.0 - 5.2.18, and older unsupported versions, it is possible for a user to provide malicious input to cause the insertion of additional log entries. This is a follow-up to CVE-2021-22096 that protects against additional types of input and in more places of the Spring Framework codebase.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
CSRF
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3 are vulnerable to CSRF attacks through CORS preflight requests that target Spring MVC (spring-webmvc module) or Spring WebFlux (spring-webflux module) endpoints. Only non-authenticated endpoints are vulnerable because preflight requests should not include credentials and therefore requests should fail authentication. However a notable exception to this are Chrome based browsers when using client certificates for authentication since Chrome sends TLS client certificates in CORS preflight requests in violation of spec requirements. No HTTP body can be sent or received as a result of this attack.

First published (updated )
Severity
5
CSRF
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Pivotal Spring Framework could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) error in Jaxb2RootElementHttpMessageConverter when processing XML data. By sending specially-crafted XML data, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to read arbitrary files and obtain sensitive information.

1 / 3
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
4.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

In Spring Framework versions 5.3.0 - 5.3.10, 5.2.0 - 5.2.17, and older unsupported versions, it is possible for a user to provide malicious input to cause the insertion of additional log entries.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
5.4
XSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

It was found that the org.spring.web.util.JavaScriptUtils.javaScriptEscape method insufficiently escaped some characters. Applications using this method to escape user-supplied content that will be rendered in HTML 5 documents may expose cross-site scripting (XSS) flaws.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A flaw found was found in Spring Framework. This flaw allows a malicious user to use a specially crafted SpEL expression that causes a denial of service (DoS).

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
XSS
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Pivotal Spring Framework is vulnerable to cross-site tracing, caused by a flaw in the HiddenHttpMethodFilter in Spring MVC. By persuading a victim to visit a specially-crafted Web site, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the victim's browser to invoke a TRACE request to return sensitive header information including cookies or authentication data from third-party domains.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
6.4
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N

(1) ZendDom, (2) ZendFeed, and (3) ZendSoap in Zend Framework 1.x before 1.11.13 and 1.12.x before 1.12.0 do not properly handle SimpleXMLElement classes, which allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files or create TCP connections via an external entity reference in a DOCTYPE element in an XML-RPC request, aka an XML external entity (XXE) injection attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-3363.

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203