The Conditional Authentication (Adaptive Authentication) script does not correctly enforce the completion of all required authentication steps when a specific multi-step pattern involving certain authenticators is configured. This allows an attacker to bypass intermediate authentication challenges by exploiting how the script handles callbacks and re-execution of authentication steps.
Successful exploitation allows a malicious actor to gain unauthorized access to a targeted user account. This vulnerability can only be exploited when all of the following conditions are met: the application login flow contains a specific secondary authenticator, the Conditional Authentication script is configured with particular event callbacks and re-executes an authentication step, the targeted user has one of the impacted authenticators enrolled, and the attacker successfully completes any preceding authentication steps.
A missing authentication enforcement vulnerability exists in the mutual TLS (mTLS) implementation used by System REST APIs and SOAP services in multiple WSO2 products. Due to improper validation of client certificate–based authentication in certain default configurations, the affected components may permit unauthenticated requests even when mTLS is enabled. This condition occurs when relying on the default mTLS settings for System REST APIs or when the mTLS authenticator is enabled for SOAP services, causing these interfaces to accept requests without enforcing additional authentication.
Successful exploitation allows a malicious actor with network access to the affected endpoints to gain administrative privileges and perform unauthorized operations. The vulnerability is exploitable only when the impacted mTLS flows are enabled and accessible in a given deployment. Other certificate-based authentication mechanisms such as Mutual TLS OAuth client authentication and X.509 login flows are not affected, and APIs served through the API Gateway of WSO2 API Manager remain unaffected.
An improper access control vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to insufficient permission enforcement in certain internal SOAP Admin Services and System REST APIs. A low-privileged user may exploit this flaw to perform unauthorized operations, including accessing server-level information.
This vulnerability affects only internal administrative interfaces. APIs exposed through the WSO2 API Manager's API Gateway remain unaffected.
Multiple WSO2 products have been identified as vulnerable to perform user impersonatoin using JIT provisioning. In order for this vulnerability to have any impact on your deployment, following conditions must be met:
An IDP configured for federated authentication and JIT provisioning enabled with the "Prompt for username, password and consent" option. A service provider that uses the above IDP for federated authentication and has the "Assert identity using mapped local subject identifier" flag enabled.
Attacker should have:
A fresh valid user account in the federated IDP that has not been used earlier. Knowledge of the username of a valid user in the local IDP.
When all preconditions are met, a malicious actor could use JIT provisioning flow to perform user impersonation.
An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. Uploaded documents for API documentation are available to an unauthenticated user.
An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. It is possible for a logged-in user to upload, as API documentation, any type of file by changing the extension to an allowed one.
An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. It is possible to force the application to perform requests to the internal workstation (SSRF port-scanning), other adjacent workstations (SSRF network scanning), or to enumerate files because of the existence of the file:// wrapper.
An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.1.0 and 2.6.0. Reflected XSS exists in the carbon part of the product.
An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.1.0 and 2.6.0. A DOM-based XSS exists in the store part of the product.
An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. A reflected XSS attack could be performed in the inline API documentation editor page of the API Publisher by sending an HTTP GET request with a harmful docName request parameter.
An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. A potential stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the inline API documentation editor page of the API Publisher.
An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0, WSO2 IS as Key Manager 5.7.0, and WSO2 Identity Server 5.8.0. When a custom claim dialect with an XSS payload is configured in the identity provider basic claim configuration, that payload gets executed, if a user picks up that dialect's URI as the provisioning claim in the advanced claim configuration of the same Identity Provider. The attacker also needs to have privileges to log in to the management console, and to add and update identity provider configurations.
An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. A potential Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in defining a scope in the "manage the API" page of the API Publisher.
An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator 6.5.0, WSO2 IS as Key Manager 5.7.0, and WSO2 Identity Server 5.8.0. A potential stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in roleToAuthorize has been identified in the registry UI.
An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. A potential Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the 'implement phase' of the API Publisher.
An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0, WSO2 IS as Key Manager 5.7.0, and WSO2 Identity Server 5.8.0. If there is a claim dialect configured with an XSS payload in the dialect URI, and a user picks up this dialect's URI and adds it as the service provider claim dialect while configuring the service provider, that payload gets executed. The attacker also needs to have privileges to log in to the management console, and to add and configure claim dialects.
An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator 6.5.0, WSO2 IS as Key Manager 5.7.0, and WSO2 Identity Server 5.8.0. A potential stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in mediaType has been identified in the registry UI.
An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. A potential Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the update API documentation feature of the API Publisher.
An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. A potential Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Datasource creation page of the Management Console.
An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0 before WSO2-CARBON-PATCH-4.4.0-4457. There is XSS via a crafted filename to the file-upload feature of the event simulator component.
XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in the file based service provider creation feature of the Management Console in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0, 3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0, and 4.0.0; and WSO2 IS as Key Manager 5.7.0, 5.9.0, and 5.10.0; and WSO2 Identity Server 5.7.0, 5.8.0, 5.9.0, 5.10.0, and 5.11.0. Allows attackers to gain read access to sensitive information or cause a denial of service via crafted GET requests.
A reflected XSS issue exists in the Management Console of several WSO2 products. This affects API Manager 2.2.0, 2.5.0, 2.6.0, 3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0, and 4.0.0; API Manager Analytics 2.2.0, 2.5.0, and 2.6.0; API Microgateway 2.2.0; Data Analytics Server 3.2.0; Enterprise Integrator 6.2.0, 6.3.0, 6.4.0, 6.5.0, and 6.6.0; IS as Key Manager 5.5.0, 5.6.0, 5.7.0, 5.9.0, and 5.10.0; Identity Server 5.5.0, 5.6.0, 5.7.0, 5.9.0, 5.10.0, and 5.11.0; Identity Server Analytics 5.5.0 and 5.6.0; and WSO2 Micro Integrator 1.0.0.
Multiple WSO2 products have been identified as vulnerable due to improper output encoding, a Stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attack can be carried out by an attacker injecting a malicious payload into the Registry feature of the Management Console.
Multiple WSO2 products have been identified as vulnerable due to lack of server-side input validation in the Forum feature, API rating could be manipulated.