Where
AND
AND
-Infinity
0

Vendor Risk Score

See how microsoft compares to other vendors in security performance

View Risk Score →
Severity
5.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Apache Thrift: Python TSSLSocket Hostname Matcher Import

1 / 2
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
6.9
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Apache Thrift: cglib heap out-of-bounds read in transport leftover-bytes path

1 / 2
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
6.9
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Apache Thrift: C++ heap out-of-bounds read in THeaderTransport::readHeaderFormat()

1 / 2
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
6.8
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N

BIND may accept incorrect child-zone NSEC3 records as valid, allowing forged authenticated NXDOMAIN responses for sibling zones. AC:H (high complexity) keeps severity at Medium despite S:C.

1 / 5
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
Buffer Overflow
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A flaw was found in rpcbind's rpcinfo utility. In rpcbdump() short mode, used by rpcinfo -s, version values returned by a remote RPCBPROCDUMP reply are appended via unbounded sprintf() calls into a fixed 256-byte stack buffer without tracking remaining space:

c char buf[256]; char p = buf; for (vl = rs->vlist; vl; vl = vl->next) { sprintf (p, "%d", vl->vers); p = p + strlen (p); if (vl->next) sprintf (p++, ","); }

A malicious or compromised rpcbind endpoint that returns enough distinct version numbers for a single program (roughly 24 maximum-width decimal values plus separators) can overflow this buffer. A user or administrator must run rpcinfo -s <host> against the hostile endpoint; no privileges on the victim are required, but user interaction is needed. Current evidence supports client-side stack memory corruption leading to a crash/denial of service of the rpcinfo client process; disclosure or reliable code execution are not established.

This bug was originally reported bundled together with a related, since-fixed overflow in rpcbaddrlist() (now tracked separately as CVE-2026-16277). Confirmed via direct inspection of upstream commit bb9bb7286a4c345442946dc2ce3c9e7f67e96d4d (rpcbind 1.2.9) that this rpcbdump() short-mode overflow is NOT fixed by that commit and remains present in the latest upstream release.

Steps to reproduce: 1. Build rpcbind with AddressSanitizer: CFLAGS="-O1 -g -fsanitize=address -fno-omit-frame-pointer" ./configure && make -j 2. Run a malicious rpcbind-compatible endpoint, or an instrumented test responder. 3. Return an RPCBPROCDUMP list for one program with enough distinct versions (~24+ max-width decimal values) to exceed 256 bytes. 4. Run ./src/rpcinfo -s <attacker-host>. 5. Observe an ASan stack-buffer-overflow report or client crash.

Proposed fix (not yet applied upstream): convert the version-list formatter to bounded snprintf() calls that track remaining buffer space. diff char p = buf; +char p = buf; +sizet rem = sizeof(buf); +int n; +buf[0] = '\0'; for (vl = rs->vlist; vl; vl = vl->next) { - sprintf (p, "%d", vl->vers); - p = p + strlen (p); - if (vl->next) - sprintf (p++, ","); + n = snprintf(p, rem, "%d%s", vl->vers, vl->next ? "," : ""); + if (n < 0) + break; + if ((sizet)n >= rem) { + p = buf + sizeof(buf) - 1; + break; + } + p += n; + rem -= (sizet)n; }

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
Buffer Overflow
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A stack-based buffer overflow was found in rpcbind's rpcinfo utility. When querying a remote rpcbind service with rpcinfo -l, address information returned by the server is copied into a fixed-size buffer without sufficient bounds checking. A malicious or compromised rpcbind server could use this flaw to crash the rpcinfo client, resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.

1 / 3
Source: NVD
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203