Where
-Infinity
0

Vendor Risk Score

See how broadcom compares to other vendors in security performance

View Risk Score →

Software

broadcom fabric operating system
95
broadcom brightstor arcserve backup
45
broadcom sannav ova
43
broadcom brocade sannav
25
broadcom raid controller web interface
22
broadcom brocade fabric operating system firmware
20
broadcom brightstor enterprise backup
19
broadcom business protection suite
17
broadcom rabbitmq server
17
broadcom etrust antivirus
16
broadcom etrust intrusion detection
16
broadcom symantec advanced secure gateway
14
broadcom etrust ez antivirus
13
broadcom inoculateit
13
broadcom server protection suite
12
broadcom brightstor arcserve backup laptops desktops
11
broadcom etrust antivirus gateway
11
broadcom ca automic workload automation
10
broadcom desktop management suite
10
broadcom dx netops spectrum
10
broadcom etrust ez armor
10
broadcom symantec critical system protection
10
broadcom privileged access manager
9
broadcom proxysg
9
broadcom reactor netty
9
broadcom sannav
9
broadcom etrust secure content manager
8
broadcom tcpreplay
8
broadcom advanced secure gateway
7
broadcom anti-virus for the enterprise
7
broadcom arcserve backup
7
broadcom spring web services
7
broadcom etrust admin
6
broadcom unicenter asset management
6
broadcom unicenter remote control
6
broadcom brightstor portal
5
broadcom brightstor san manager
5
broadcom common services
5
broadcom desktop protection suite
5
broadcom internet security suite
5
broadcom license software
5
broadcom project portfolio management
5
broadcom spring data commons
5
broadcom symantec data center security server and agents
5
broadcom symantec identity governance and administration
5
broadcom vmware avi load balancer
5
broadcom advantage data transport
4
broadcom brocade active support connectivity gateway
4
broadcom cleverpath ecm
4
broadcom cleverpath olap
4
Severity
6.4
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Incomplete property masking in the SANnav logging subsystem permits SNMP authentication and privacy passwords to be recorded in application logs under specific configuration conditions. Individuals with read access to system logs or support bundles can retrieve these credentials, leading to unauthorized read or management access to monitored switch environments

First published (updated )
Severity
6.9
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

An information exposure vulnerability in the job scheduling component of SANnav allows sensitive credentials to be written to application logs in plain text. When scheduled support save jobs or related operational tasks are executed, sensitive parameters including external server passwords and archive protection keys are logged without proper masking. A local or authenticated user with access to application logs or support bundles can view these cleartext credentials, potentially leading to unauthorized access to remote backup targets or protected archives.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.9
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

A logic flaw in Java cache key handling object comparison handling could lead to improper identifier resolution when processing specific user account structures. The issue has been remediated by updating the internal comparison routines to ensure accurate object evaluation and prevent potential identity mismatch conditions.

First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Computer Associates InoculateIT Agent for Exchange Server does not recognize an e-mail virus attachment if the SMTP header is missing the "From" field, which allows remote attackers to bypass virus protection.

First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Spring Statemachine's Kryo-based persistence backends (JPA, MongoDB, Redis and ZooKeeper) deserialise persisted state-machine contexts without enforcing a class allowlist (CWE-502, deserialisation of untrusted data), which can lead to remote code execution inside the application JVM.

Affected versions: Spring Statemachine 4.0.0 through 4.0.1 Spring Statemachine 3.2.0 through 3.2.4

First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

An attacker can craft a large number of unique requests that trigger a failure, exhausting the capacity of the application-wide stateful retry cache. Once the cache is full, it permanently rejects any further updates, causing all later stateful retries and circuit breakers in the application to fail.

Affected versions: Spring Retry 2.0.0 through 2.0.12; 1.3.0 through 1.3.4.

First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Spring Data's internal property-lookup cache accepts and permanently retains attacker-supplied strings as cache keys, allowing heap exhaustion through repeated requests.

Affected versions: Spring Data Commons 2.7.0 through 2.7.19; 3.3.0 through 3.3.16; 3.4.0 through 3.4.14; 3.5.0 through 3.5.11; 4.0.0 through 4.0.5.

First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

src/main/java/org/springframework/data/mapping/context/PersistentPropertyPathFactory.java:175 · Unbounded Resource Allocation (Algorithmic DoS)

Impact

When a consuming module routes user-supplied dot-paths (sort parameters, projection paths, PATCH paths) through MappingContext.getPersistentPropertyPath(String, Class), each distinct string — including invalid ones — is cached forever. A remote attacker can send millions of requests with unique ?sort=aaaa<n> values and grow the heap until the service OOMs.

Description

PersistentPropertyPathFactory.propertyPaths (line 53) is a ConcurrentHashMap<TypeAndPath, PathResolution> populated by getPotentiallyCachedPath() (line 174-177) via computeIfAbsent. The key is (TypeInformation, rawPathString). Crucially, unresolvable paths are also cached (as PathResolution.unresolved, line 204) so that the same InvalidPersistentPropertyPath can be re-thrown — meaning every distinct garbage string an attacker sends creates a permanent entry. There is no eviction. This is reachable from AbstractMappingContext.getPersistentPropertyPath(String, Class) (AbstractMappingContext.java:345), which Spring Data REST and several store query mappers call with HTTP-request-derived sort/filter property names.

By contrast, the sibling SimplePropertyPath.cache was already hardened to use ConcurrentReferenceHashMap (soft refs); this cache was not given the same treatment.

Exploit scenario

Against a Spring Data REST endpoint, an attacker scripts GET /things?sort=<random-40-char-string> in a loop. Each request fails fast with InvalidPersistentPropertyPath, but each distinct random string leaves behind a TypeAndPath key, a PathResolution object holding the split segments list, and the source string in the map. After ~10M requests the JVM OOMs.

Preconditions

- A downstream component (Spring Data REST, a store-specific QueryMapper, or application code) passes externally-supplied strings to MappingContext.getPersistentPropertyPath(String, ...) - No upstream rate-limiting or path-string validation

How to fix

A cache whose key can be derived from external input must be bounded. Replace propertyPaths (line 53) with a ConcurrentLruCache<TypeAndPath, PathResolution> of fixed capacity, or ConcurrentReferenceHashMap (matching the sibling SimplePropertyPath.cache). Additionally, do not cache PathResolution.unresolved results at all (line 204 in createPersistentPropertyPath) — re-computing a failed lookup is cheap, and caching negative results for arbitrary attacker strings is what makes this exploitable.

Adversarial verification

Verdict: TRUEPOSITIVE (confidence: 7/10) — unbounded hard-ref ConcurrentHashMap keyed by raw path string, caches unresolved entries (line 204), reachable via public MappingContext.getPersistentPropertyPath(String, ...); sibling PropertyPath cache was already converted to soft-refs but this one was missed. -3 confidence because the HTTP-input wiring lives in downstream modules (Spring Data REST / store mappers), not verifiable in this repo.

Code at the line — CONFIRMED - Line 53: private final Map<TypeAndPath, PathResolution> propertyPaths = new ConcurrentHashMap<>(); — plain CHM, hard refs, no eviction, no size bound. - Line 175: propertyPaths.computeIfAbsent(TypeAndPath.of(type, propertyPath), ...) — every distinct (type, string) pair is inserted. - Line 204: return PathResolution.unresolved(parts, segment, type, currentPath); — returned from inside computeIfAbsent's mapping function, so unresolvable paths are cached. The PathResolution retains the full attacker string (source = StringUtils.collectionToDelimitedString(parts, "."), line 452).

Callers within spring-data-commons - AbstractMappingContext.getPersistentPropertyPath(String, Class<?>) (line 345) and (String, TypeInformation<?>) (line 350) → persistentPropertyPathFactory.from(type, propertyPath) → straight into the unbounded cache. No validation, no PropertyPath.from gate. - This is the public MappingContext interface (MappingContext.java:174,186), documented to throw InvalidPersistentPropertyPath on bad input — i.e., the contract explicitly anticipates being called with possibly-invalid strings. - No in-repo caller routes HTTP input directly into the String overload. The Sort.Order.property → getPersistentPropertyPath(String, ...) bridge lives in store modules (Spring Data MongoDB QueryMapper, Spring Data REST sort translator). That wiring is out-of-repo as the finding states.

Protections — NONE on this cache Contrast: SimplePropertyPath.java:52 (the PropertyPath.from cache) uses ConcurrentReferenceHashMap (soft refs, GC-evictable). Spring already hardened the sibling cache against exactly this pattern. PersistentPropertyPathFactory.propertyPaths was not given the same treatment.

Stress-test Is this exclusion #3 (intended design)? The PathResolution javadoc (line 426-430) says caching unresolved paths is deliberate — to make repeated lookups of the same bad path cheap. But unbounded hard-ref caching of arbitrary attacker-chosen keys is not the intent; the sibling fix proves Spring considers this a bug class.

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Spring Security Authorization Server's authorization endpoint performs insufficient validation of the requesturi parameter. An attacker can craft a malicious authorization request containing an invalid requesturi and an arbitrary, unvalidated redirecturi, which can lead to an Open Redirect vulnerability.

Affected versions: Spring Security 7.0.0 through 7.0.5. Spring Authorization Server 1.5.0 through 1.5.7.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Applications using Spring Data Commons may be vulnerable to a Denial of Service (DoS) attack leading to a StackOverflowException when parsing Sort parameters.

Affected versions: Spring Data Commons 4.0.0 through 4.0.5; 3.5.0 through 3.5.11; 3.4.0 through 3.4.14; 3.3.0 through 3.3.16; 3.2.0 through 3.2.15; 3.1.0 through 3.1.14; 3.0.0 through 3.0.15; 2.7.0 through 2.7.19.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.4
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

A SpEL Injection vulnerability exists in the Spring Data KeyValue if unsanitized user input is passed as Sort into a repository query method that delegates evaluation to the SpelPropertyComparator.

Affected versions: Spring Data KeyValue / Spring Data Redis 4.0.0 through 4.0.5; 3.5.0 through 3.5.11; 3.4.0 through 3.4.14; 3.3.0 through 3.3.16; 3.2.0 through 3.2.15; 3.1.0 through 3.1.14; 3.0.0 through 3.0.15; 2.7.0 through 2.7.19.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Spring Data Commons contains a vulnerability that can lead to a Denial of Service (DoS) condition if Spring Data Web Support is enabled in conjunction with a Controller method using @ProjectedPayload, when an attacker sends a specially crafted HTTP request that causes the application to allocate lots of memory.

Affected versions: Spring Data Commons 4.0.0 through 4.0.5; 3.5.0 through 3.5.11; 3.4.0 through 3.4.14; 3.3.0 through 3.3.16; 3.2.0 through 3.2.15; 3.1.0 through 3.1.14; 3.0.0 through 3.0.15; 2.7.0 through 2.7.19.

First published (updated )
Severity
9.6
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Authentication bypass by primary weakness vulnerability in Spring Security Spring Authorization Server.

This issue affects Spring Authorization Server: from 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, from 1.5.0 through 1.5.6, from 1.4.0 through 1.4.9, from 1.3.0 through 1.3.10.

First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

A path traversal vulnerability exists in curl <8.0.0 SFTP implementation causes the tilde (~) character to be wrongly replaced when used as a prefix in the first path element in addition to its intended use as the first element to indicate a path relative to the user's home directory. Attackers can exploit this flaw to bypass filtering or execute arbitrary code by crafting a path like /~2/foo while accessing a server with a specific user.

1 / 4
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
3 Months
Path Traversal
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Broadcom VMware vCenter contains a path traversal vulnerability which could allow a threat actor with network access to vCenter to execute arbitrary code.

1 / 2
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
7.3
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

DefaultExecutionContextSerializer, used by default in Spring Batch's JDBC job repository, passes Base64-decoded bytes directly to ObjectInputStream.readObject() without an ObjectInputFilter that restricts types to a trusted class allowlist. Spring Batch 6.0.0 - 6.0.4 Spring Batch 5.2.6 and earlier

First published (updated )
Severity
3.3
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

The Spring Boot language server logs the raw value of the httpsproxy/HTTPSPROXY/httpproxy/HTTPPROXY environment variable at INFO level whenever it creates an outbound HTTP client and no explicit http.proxy workspace setting is configured. Corporate proxy URLs frequently embed Basic-auth credentials in the form http://user:pass@proxy:8080, and the language server writes this value to its log file without any redaction. Since language server log files are often attached to bug reports or are readable by other local users/processes, this can result in disclosure of proxy credentials. Affected Spring Products and Versions: Spring Tools for Eclipse: 5.2.0 and earlier Spring Tools for VSCode / Cursor / Theia: 2.2.0 and earlier

First published (updated )
Severity
8
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Starting Spring Boot applications in the Spring Tools with the live information mode enabled makes the running application vulnerable against JMX-based remote code execution. Affected Spring Products and Versions: Spring Tools for Eclipse: 5.2.0 and earlier Spring Tools for VSCode / Cursor / Theia: 2.2.0 and earlier

First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

An issue was discovered in Pivotal Spring Web Flow through 2.4.5. Applications that do not change the value of the MvcViewFactoryCreator useSpringBinding property which is disabled by default (i.e., set to 'false') can be vulnerable to malicious EL expressions in view states that process form submissions but do not have a sub-element to declare explicit data binding property mappings. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-4971.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

An issue was discovered in Pivotal Spring Web Flow through 2.4.4. Applications that do not change the value of the MvcViewFactoryCreator useSpringBinding property which is disabled by default (i.e., set to 'false') can be vulnerable to malicious EL expressions in view states that process form submissions but do not have a sub-element to declare explicit data binding property mappings.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
Integer Overflow
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

In Reactor Core, applications that use the Flux.windowTimeout operator with fairBackpressure enabled are vulnerable to a Denial of Service (DoS) condition. Reactor Core 3.8.0 - 3.8.6 Reactor Core 3.5.0 - 3.7.19 Reactor Core 3.4.41 and earlier

First published (updated )
Severity
4.8
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

Spring Data Relational does not properly escape binding values of externally-controlled input when using StringMatcher (STARTING, ENDING, or CONTAINING) in Query By Example (QBE). An attacker can supply wildcard characters to perform boolean-based blind data inference.

Affected versions: Spring Data Relational/JDBC/R2DBC 4.0.0 through 4.0.5; 3.5.0 through 3.5.11; 3.4.0 through 3.4.14; 3.3.0 through 3.3.16; 3.2.0 through 3.2.15; 3.1.0 through 3.1.14; 3.0.0 through 3.0.15; 2.4.0 through 2.4.19.

First published (updated )
Severity
3.7
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

In specific scenarios involving multiple clients with different DNS resolver configurations, Reactor Netty may incorrectly reuse a previously configured DNS resolver. Reactor Netty 1.3.0 - 1.3.6 Reactor Netty 1.1.0 - 1.2.18 Reactor Netty 1.0.52 and earlier

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

In specific scenarios, the Reactor Netty HTTP Server may leak exception details across unrelated requests. In order for this to happen, the server must be configured with Brave Tracing. Reactor Netty 1.3.0 - 1.3.6 Reactor Netty 1.1.0 - 1.2.18 Reactor Netty 1.0.52 and earlier

First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
Infoleak
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

In specific scenarios involving WebSocket handshake redirects to a different origin, the Reactor Netty WebSocket client may leak credentials. In order for this to happen, the HTTP client must have been explicitly configured to follow redirects. Reactor Netty 1.3.0 - 1.3.6 Reactor Netty 1.1.0 - 1.2.18 Reactor Netty 1.0.52 and earlier

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

In specific scenarios, Reactor Netty HTTP Server may incorrectly evaluate the remote IP address when HAProxy Protocol is enabled. In order for this to happen, the application must be configured to use HAProxy Protocol. Reactor Netty 1.3.0 - 1.3.6 Reactor Netty 1.1.0 - 1.2.18 Reactor Netty 1.0.52 and earlier

First published (updated )
Severity
4.3
Infoleak
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

A flaw was found in the Reactor Netty HTTP Server, which may log request headers in some cases of invalid HTTP requests. This could allow an attacker to access privileged information when WARN level logging is enabled.

1 / 5
First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

The HttpClient from Reactor Netty, versions 0.9.x prior to 0.9.5, and versions 0.8.x prior to 0.8.16, may be used incorrectly, leading to a credentials leak during a redirect to a different domain. In order for this to happen, the HttpClient must have been explicitly configured to follow redirects.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Input Validation
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Reactor Netty HttpServer, versions 0.9.3 and 0.9.4, is exposed to a URISyntaxException that causes the connection to be closed prematurely instead of producing a 400 response.

First published (updated )
Severity
8.6
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Pivotal Reactor Netty, versions prior to 0.8.11, passes headers through redirects, including authorization ones. A remote unauthenticated malicious user may gain access to credentials for a different server than they have access to.

First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203