Where
AND
-Infinity
0

Vendor Risk Score

See how cisco compares to other vendors in security performance

View Risk Score →

Software

cisco ios xe
8
cisco catalyst sd-wan controller
5
cisco catalyst sd-wan manager
5
cisco identity services engine
4
cisco unified communications manager
4
cisco identity services engine (ise)
3
cisco ise passive identity connector
3
cisco router
3
cisco rv320
3
cisco rv325
3
cisco secure email and web manager
3
cisco secure email gateway
3
cisco secure firewall management center (fmc)
3
cisco smart licensing utility
3
cisco adaptive security appliance software
2
cisco broadworks
2
cisco catalyst sd-wan manager (cisco sd-wan cloud (cisco managed))
2
cisco catalyst sd-wan manager (cisco sd-wan cloud-pro)
2
cisco catalyst sd-wan manager (cisco sd-wan for government (fedramp))
2
cisco catalyst sd-wan manager (on-prem deployment)
2
cisco cisco ios xe web ui
2
cisco devices
2
cisco rv042g firmware
2
cisco secure firewall management center
2
cisco secure firewall threat defense
2
cisco webex calling dedicated instance
2
cisco adaptive security appliance (asa) and firepower threat defense (ftd)
1
cisco asa software
1
cisco asyncos
1
cisco broadworks network server
1
cisco broadworks xtended services platform firmware
1
cisco business process automation
1
cisco catalyst 3650
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48fd-e
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48fd-l
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48fd-s
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48uq
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48uq-e
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48uq-l
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48uq-s
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48ur
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48ur-e
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48ur-l
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48ur-s
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48uz
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48uz-e
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48uz-l
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48uz-s
1
cisco catalyst 3650-24pd
1
cisco catalyst 3650-24pd-e
1
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

HTTP/2 Rapid reset attack The HTTP/2 protocol allows clients to indicate to the server that a previous stream should be canceled by sending a RSTSTREAM frame. The protocol does not require the client and server to coordinate the cancellation in any way, the client may do it unilaterally. The client may also assume that the cancellation will take effect immediately when the server receives the RSTSTREAM frame, before any other data from that TCP connection is processed.

Abuse of this feature is called a Rapid Reset attack because it relies on the ability for an endpoint to send a RSTSTREAM frame immediately after sending a request frame, which makes the other endpoint start working and then rapidly resets the request. The request is canceled, but leaves the HTTP/2 connection open.

The HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack built on this capability is simple: The client opens a large number of streams at once as in the standard HTTP/2 attack, but rather than waiting for a response to each request stream from the server or proxy, the client cancels each request immediately.

The ability to reset streams immediately allows each connection to have an indefinite number of requests in flight. By explicitly canceling the requests, the attacker never exceeds the limit on the number of concurrent open streams. The number of in-flight requests is no longer dependent on the round-trip time (RTT), but only on the available network bandwidth.

In a typical HTTP/2 server implementation, the server will still have to do significant amounts of work for canceled requests, such as allocating new stream data structures, parsing the query and doing header decompression, and mapping the URL to a resource. For reverse proxy implementations, the request may be proxied to the backend server before the RSTSTREAM frame is processed. The client on the other hand paid almost no costs for sending the requests. This creates an exploitable cost asymmetry between the server and the client.

Multiple software artifacts implementing HTTP/2 are affected. This advisory was originally ingested from the swift-nio-http2 repo advisory and their original conent follows.

swift-nio-http2 specific advisory swift-nio-http2 is vulnerable to a denial-of-service vulnerability in which a malicious client can create and then reset a large number of HTTP/2 streams in a short period of time. This causes swift-nio-http2 to commit to a large amount of expensive work which it then throws away, including creating entirely new Channels to serve the traffic. This can easily overwhelm an EventLoop and prevent it from making forward progress.

swift-nio-http2 1.28 contains a remediation for this issue that applies reset counter using a sliding window. This constrains the number of stream resets that may occur in a given window of time. Clients violating this limit will have their connections torn down. This allows clients to continue to cancel streams for legitimate reasons, while constraining malicious actors.

1 / 10
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Buffer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A vulnerability in the Object Linking and Embedding 2 (OLE2) decryption routine of ClamAV could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to an integer underflow in a bounds check that allows for a heap buffer overflow read. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted file containing OLE2 content to be scanned by ClamAV on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to terminate the ClamAV scanning process, resulting in a DoS condition on the affected software. For a description of this vulnerability, see the . Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.

1 / 3
Source: Debian
First published (updated )
Severity
10
EPSS
3.62%
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Erlang Erlang/OTP SSH server contains a missing authentication for critical function vulnerability. This could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands without valid credentials, potentially leading to unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE). By exploiting a flaw in how SSH protocol messages are handled, a malicious actor could gain unauthorized access to affected systems. This vulnerability could affect various products that implement Erlang/OTP SSH server, including—but not limited to—Cisco, NetApp, and SUSE.

1 / 5
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
5.8
Buffer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L

A vulnerability in the Remote Access VPN (RAVPN) service of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) of the RAVPN service. This vulnerability is due to resource exhaustion. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a large number of VPN authentication requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to exhaust resources, resulting in a DoS of the RAVPN service on the affected device. Depending on the impact of the attack, a reload of the device may be required to restore the RAVPN service. Services that are not related to VPN are not affected. Cisco Talos discussed these attacks in the blog post Large-scale brute-force activity targeting VPNs, SSH services with commonly used login credentials.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
7.2
Input Validation, Command Injection, OS Command Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A vulnerability in the web UI feature of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to inject commands with the privileges of root. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted input to the web UI. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to inject commands to the underlying operating system with root privileges.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Command Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Cisco IOS XE Web UI contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in the web user interface that could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to create an account with privilege level 15 access. The attacker can then use that account to gain control of the affected device.

1 / 3
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
7.2
Input Validation, Command Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business Routers RV016, RV042, RV042G, RV082, RV320, and RV325 Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user input within incoming HTTP packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the web-based management interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain root-level privileges and access unauthorized data. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to have valid administrative credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not and will not release software updates that address this vulnerability.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
9.9
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:H

A vulnerability in an API of Cisco ISE could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands as the root user on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insecure deserialization of user-supplied Java byte streams by the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted serialized Java object to an affected API. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device and elevate privileges. Note: To successfully exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid read-only administrative credentials. In a single-node deployment, new devices will not be able to authenticate during the reload time.

First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203