Where
AND
-Infinity
0

Vendor Risk Score

See how cisco compares to other vendors in security performance

View Risk Score →

Software

cisco ios xe
6
cisco apache struts
5
cisco unified communications manager
4
cisco adaptive security appliance software
3
cisco catalyst sd-wan manager
3
cisco business process automation
2
cisco catalyst sd-wan controller
2
cisco catalyst sd-wan manager (cisco sd-wan cloud (cisco managed))
2
cisco catalyst sd-wan manager (cisco sd-wan cloud-pro)
2
cisco catalyst sd-wan manager (cisco sd-wan for government (fedramp))
2
cisco catalyst sd-wan manager (on-prem deployment)
2
cisco cloudcenter
2
cisco identity services engine
2
cisco secure email and web manager
2
cisco secure email gateway
2
cisco secure firewall management center
2
cisco secure firewall management center (fmc)
2
cisco unified communications manager im and presence service
2
cisco unified contact center express
2
cisco unity connection
2
cisco virtualized voice browser
2
cisco webex calling dedicated instance
2
cisco advanced malware protection virtual private cloud appliance
1
cisco asyncos
1
cisco automated subsea tuning
1
cisco broadworks
1
cisco catalyst 3650
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48fd-e
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48fd-l
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48fd-s
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48uq
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48uq-e
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48uq-l
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48uq-s
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48ur
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48ur-e
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48ur-l
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48ur-s
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48uz
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48uz-e
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48uz-l
1
cisco catalyst 3650-12x48uz-s
1
cisco catalyst 3650-24pd
1
cisco catalyst 3650-24pd-e
1
cisco catalyst 3650-24pd-l
1
cisco catalyst 3650-24pd-s
1
cisco catalyst 3650-24pdm
1
cisco catalyst 3650-24pdm-e
1
cisco catalyst 3650-24pdm-l
1
cisco catalyst 3650-24pdm-s
1
Severity
7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

HTTP/2 Rapid reset attack The HTTP/2 protocol allows clients to indicate to the server that a previous stream should be canceled by sending a RSTSTREAM frame. The protocol does not require the client and server to coordinate the cancellation in any way, the client may do it unilaterally. The client may also assume that the cancellation will take effect immediately when the server receives the RSTSTREAM frame, before any other data from that TCP connection is processed.

Abuse of this feature is called a Rapid Reset attack because it relies on the ability for an endpoint to send a RSTSTREAM frame immediately after sending a request frame, which makes the other endpoint start working and then rapidly resets the request. The request is canceled, but leaves the HTTP/2 connection open.

The HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack built on this capability is simple: The client opens a large number of streams at once as in the standard HTTP/2 attack, but rather than waiting for a response to each request stream from the server or proxy, the client cancels each request immediately.

The ability to reset streams immediately allows each connection to have an indefinite number of requests in flight. By explicitly canceling the requests, the attacker never exceeds the limit on the number of concurrent open streams. The number of in-flight requests is no longer dependent on the round-trip time (RTT), but only on the available network bandwidth.

In a typical HTTP/2 server implementation, the server will still have to do significant amounts of work for canceled requests, such as allocating new stream data structures, parsing the query and doing header decompression, and mapping the URL to a resource. For reverse proxy implementations, the request may be proxied to the backend server before the RSTSTREAM frame is processed. The client on the other hand paid almost no costs for sending the requests. This creates an exploitable cost asymmetry between the server and the client.

Multiple software artifacts implementing HTTP/2 are affected. This advisory was originally ingested from the swift-nio-http2 repo advisory and their original conent follows.

swift-nio-http2 specific advisory swift-nio-http2 is vulnerable to a denial-of-service vulnerability in which a malicious client can create and then reset a large number of HTTP/2 streams in a short period of time. This causes swift-nio-http2 to commit to a large amount of expensive work which it then throws away, including creating entirely new Channels to serve the traffic. This can easily overwhelm an EventLoop and prevent it from making forward progress.

swift-nio-http2 1.28 contains a remediation for this issue that applies reset counter using a sliding window. This constrains the number of stream resets that may occur in a given window of time. Clients violating this limit will have their connections torn down. This allows clients to continue to cancel streams for legitimate reasons, while constraining malicious actors.

1 / 8
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Summary

Log4j versions prior to 2.16.0 are subject to a remote code execution vulnerability via the ldap JNDI parser. As per Apache's Log4j security guide: Apache Log4j2 <=2.14.1 JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.16.0, this behavior has been disabled by default.

Log4j version 2.15.0 contained an earlier fix for the vulnerability, but that patch did not disable attacker-controlled JNDI lookups in all situations. For more information, see the Updated advice for version 2.16.0 section of this advisory.

Impact

Logging untrusted or user controlled data with a vulnerable version of Log4J may result in Remote Code Execution (RCE) against your application. This includes untrusted data included in logged errors such as exception traces, authentication failures, and other unexpected vectors of user controlled input.

Affected versions

Any Log4J version prior to v2.15.0 is affected to this specific issue.

The v1 branch of Log4J which is considered End Of Life (EOL) is vulnerable to other RCE vectors so the recommendation is to still update to 2.16.0 where possible.

Security releases Additional backports of this fix have been made available in versions 2.3.1, 2.12.2, and 2.12.3

Affected packages Only the org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core package is directly affected by this vulnerability. The org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api should be kept at the same version as the org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core package to ensure compatability if in use.

Remediation Advice

Updated advice for version 2.16.0

The Apache Logging Services team provided updated mitigation advice upon the release of version 2.16.0, which disables JNDI by default and completely removes support for message lookups. Even in version 2.15.0, lookups used in layouts to provide specific pieces of context information will still recursively resolve, possibly triggering JNDI lookups. This problem is being tracked as CVE-2021-45046. More information is available on the GitHub Security Advisory for CVE-2021-45046.

Users who want to avoid attacker-controlled JNDI lookups but cannot upgrade to 2.16.0 must ensure that no such lookups resolve to attacker-provided data and ensure that the the JndiLookup class is not loaded.

Please note that Log4J v1 is End Of Life (EOL) and will not receive patches for this issue. Log4J v1 is also vulnerable to other RCE vectors and we recommend you migrate to Log4J 2.16.0 where possible.

1 / 7
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
EPSS
0.05%
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A vulnerability in the OLE2 file format parser of ClamAV could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to an incorrect check for end-of-string values during scanning, which may result in a heap buffer over-read. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted file containing OLE2 content to be scanned by ClamAV on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the ClamAV scanning process to terminate, resulting in a DoS condition on the affected software and consuming available system resources. For a description of this vulnerability, see the ClamAV blog .

1 / 4
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
10
EPSS
0.16%
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:H

A vulnerability in multiple Cisco Unified Communications and Contact Center Solutions products could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to the improper processing of user-provided data that is being read into memory. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted message to a listening port of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with the privileges of the web services user. With access to the underlying operating system, the attacker could also establish root access on the affected device.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
XSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

A vulnerability has been found in ThinuTech ThinuCMS 1.5 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /authorposts.php. The manipulation of the argument author with the input g6g12<script>alert(1)</script>o8sdm leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be launched remotely. The identifier VDB-233293 was assigned to this vulnerability.

First published (updated )
Severity
8.4
Integer Overflow
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Memory corruption in Graphics Linux while assigning shared virtual memory region during IOCTL call.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
8.4
Buffer Overflow
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Memory corruption while submitting a large list of sync points in an AUX command to the IOCTLKGSLGPUAUXCOMMAND.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
Use After Free
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Memory corruption in DSP Services during a remote call from HLOS to DSP.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
7.2
Input Validation, Command Injection, OS Command Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A vulnerability in the web UI feature of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to inject commands with the privileges of root. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted input to the web UI. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to inject commands to the underlying operating system with root privileges.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Command Injection
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Cisco IOS XE Web UI contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in the web user interface that could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to create an account with privilege level 15 access. The attacker can then use that account to gain control of the affected device.

1 / 3
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Apache Log4j <=2.14.1 JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled (CVE-2021-44228).

1 / 6
Source: FortiGuard

Remedy

As per upstream: - In prior releases confirm that if the JDBC Appender is being used it is not configured to use any protocol other than Java. - Note that only the log4j-core JAR file is impacted by this vulnerability. Applications using only the log4j-api JAR file without the log4j-core JAR file are not impacted by this vulnerability.
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Double Free
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:C

A double free in Fortinet FortiOS versions 7.0.0 through 7.0.5, FortiPAM version 1.0.0 through 1.0.3, 1.1.0 through 1.1.1 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted request.

1 / 2

Remedy

Please upgrade to FortiOS version 7.2.0 or above Please upgrade to FortiOS version 7.0.6 or above Please upgrade to FortiOS version 6.4.15 or above Please upgrade to FortiPAM version 1.2.0 or above Please upgrade to FortiPAM version 1.1.2 or above
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203