See how condor project compares to other vendors in security performance
The standard universe shadow (condorshadow.std) component in Condor 7.7.3 through 7.7.6, 7.8.0 before 7.8.5, and 7.9.0 does no properly check privileges, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges via a crafted standard universe job.
The policy definition evaluator in Condor before 7.4.2 does not properly handle attributes in a WANTSUSPEND policy that evaluate to an UNDEFINED state, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (condorstartd exit) via a crafted job.
A denial of service flaw was found in the way Condor's policy definition evaluator processed certain policy definitions. If an administrator used an attribute defined on a job in any of the following condorstartd policies (CONTINUE, KILL, PREEMPT, SUSPEND), a remote Condor service user could use this flaw to cause a denial of the condorstartd service by submitting a Condor job that caused certain policy definition to be evaluated to either ERROR or UNDEFINED states.
Workaround: =========== Check for UNDEFINED & ERROR in the policy configuration.
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Condor 7.6.x before 7.6.10 and 7.8.x before 7.8.4 have unknown impact and attack vectors related to "error checking of system calls."
The filesystem authentication (condorio/condorauthfs.cpp) in Condor 7.6.x before 7.6.10 and 7.8.x before 7.8.4 uses authentication directories even when they have weak permissions, which allows remote attackers to impersonate users by renaming a user's authentication directory.
Multiple buffer overflows in Condor 7.6.x before 7.6.10 and 7.8.x before 7.8.4 have unknown impact and attack vectors.
aviary/jobcontrol.py in Condor, as used in Red Hat Enterprise MRG 2.3, when removing a job, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (condorschedd restart) via square brackets in the cproc option.
Condor before 7.8.2 allows remote attackers to bypass host-based authentication and execute actions such as ALLOWADMINISTRATOR or ALLOWWRITE by connecting from a system with a spoofed reverse DNS hostname.
Florian Weimer of the Red Hat Product Security Team found that an unauthenticated user able to connect to the Condor startd TCP port could request ads, provided they could guess or brute force the PID of the process, due to how the GIVEREQUESTAD handler is registered. The ads contains a lot of already-public information for users with READ privileges, however it also provides the ClaimId (as opposed to the PublicClaimId which truncates the full value of the ClaimID). If an attacker could obtain the private ClaimId, they could use it to control the running job, and also start new jobs on the system.
Florian Weimer of the Red Hat Product Security Team discovered that the ability to abort a job in Condor only required WRITE authorization, instead of a combination of WRITE authorization and job ownership. This could allow an authenticated attacker to bypass intended restrictions and abort any idle job on the system.
Multiple format string flaws were found in Condor:
a) when the XML message log format was requested in Condor submit job by remote Condor user and that user attempted to write a specially-crafted message into user log file via condorhold tool it could lead to condorschedd daemon crash, or, potentially arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the 'condor' user []. Also this way an attacker could potentially prevent other Condor jobs from being scheduled and ever executed,
b) request for file transfer by remote Condor user to transmit a file, with specially-crafted name, could lead to child process of condorschedd daemon to crash (repeated process, where condorschedd daemon would fork a child process to handle the request, the child to crash, while trying to handle it and condorschedd daemon to fork another child since the particular Condor job still have not been completed successfully).
Upstream bug report (mentioning only one attack vector): [1] https://condor-wiki.cs.wisc.edu/index.cgi/tktview?tn=2660
General upstream patch (addressing among these flaws also couple of compiler warning problems): [2] http://condor-git.cs.wisc.edu/?p=condor.git;a=commitdiff;h=5e5571d1a431eb3c61977b6dd6ec90186ef79867
-- [] Arbitrary code execution was possible only on systems, where Condor daemons were not compiled with FORTIFYSOURCE protection mechanism. On systems with this protection enabled, particular flaw would lead to Condor service crash only.
Condor 6.5.4 through 7.2.4, 7.3.x, and 7.4.0, as used in MRG, Grid for MRG, and Grid Execute Node for MRG, allows remote authenticated users to queue jobs as an arbitrary user, and thereby gain privileges, by using a Condor command-line tool to modify an unspecified job attribute.
Unspecified vulnerability in the condor schedd daemon in Condor before 7.0.5 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via unknown vectors.
Stack-based buffer overflow in the condor schedd daemon in Condor before 7.0.5 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors.
Condor before 7.0.5 does not properly handle when the configuration specifies overlapping netmasks in allow or deny rules, which causes the rule to be ignored and allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions.
Unspecified vulnerability in Condor before 7.0.5 allows attackers to execute jobs as other users via unknown vectors.
Condor before 7.0.4 does not properly handle wildcards in the ALLOWWRITE, DENYWRITE, HOSTALLOWWRITE, or HOSTDENYWRITE configuration variables in authorization policy lists, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions.