Where
-Infinity
0

Vendor Risk Score

See how hcltech compares to other vendors in security performance

View Risk Score →

Software

Severity
5.5
CSRF
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HCL Technologies Ltd. Unica 12.0.0.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.3
Malicious File Upload
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

File upload vulnerability in HCL Technologies Ltd. Unica 12.0.0.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.5
XSS
AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L

Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in HCL Technologies Limited HCLTech DRAGON before v.7.6.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via missing directives

First published (updated )
Severity
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L

An issue in HCL Technologies Limited HCLTech GRAGON before v.7.6.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via APIs do not enforcing limits on the number or size of requests

First published (updated )
Severity
5.4
XSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in HCL Technologies Ltd. Unica 12.0.0.

First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CSV formula injection vulnerability in HCL Technologies Ltd. Unica 12.0.0.

First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

HCL BigFix Platform is affected by insecure permissions on private cryptographic keys.  The private cryptographic keys located on a Windows host machine might be subject to overly permissive file system permissions.

First published (updated )
Severity
4
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

HCL BigFix Platform is affected by insufficient authentication.  The application might allow users to access sensitive areas of the application without proper authentication.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

HCL DFXServer is affected by a Missing Access Control vulnerability. This vulnerability states that certain endpoints are accessible without any form of authentication in another browser. This allows any network user to invoke these APIs and interact with the application without verification of their identity or authorization level.

First published (updated )
Severity
8.2
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

HCL DFXServer is affected by an Authentication Bypass vulnerability via server response manipulation. An unauthorized user without valid credentials can exploit this flaw by intercepting and altering the server's authentication responses, allowing them to gain unauthorized access to the application without verification.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.3
Weak Encryption
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

HCL DFXServer is affected by an Unencrypted Communication vulnerability. The application permits users to establish connections over unencrypted channels via the HTTP protocol, which could allow a remote attacker to intercept network traffic and expose sensitive data transmitted between the user and the application.

First published (updated )
Severity
8.2
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

HCL DFXServer is affected by a Broken Authentication vulnerability via direct API access. The application fails to verify the user's authentication status when accessing specific API endpoints, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to interact with the APIs and perform unauthorized actions without valid credentials.

First published (updated )
Severity
8.2
Infoleak
AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Internal IP Address Disclosure vulnerability. The application includes internal IP address details within its generated server responses, which could allow a remote attacker to gather sensitive network topology information and use it to map the internal infrastructure for further targeted attacks.

First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Buffer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Buffer Overflow vulnerability that can lead to a Denial of Service (DoS). The application fails to properly validate input sizes, allowing an attacker to pass an excessive amount of information into a memory container, which can cause the system to crash or become unresponsive. To mitigate this flaw, comprehensive input length checks must be implemented and enforced on both the client and server sides.

First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Deprecated Protocol vulnerability due to the use of TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1. These legacy protocols contain numerous cryptographic design flaws that expose data to interception and decryption. To remediate this risk, the application must disable all support for TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1, and exclusively enable support for secure protocols, specifically TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
Infoleak, CSRF
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Missing SameSite Attribute vulnerability. The application fails to set the "SameSite" attribute on session cookies generated during authentication, which could allow a remote attacker to execute Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks if additional mitigations, such as Anti-CSRF tokens, are not implemented.

First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Account Takeover via Response Manipulation vulnerability. A remote attacker can intercept and alter the contents of the server's HTTP responses before they reach the client application, allowing them to manipulate the authentication or authorization logic to bypass controls and gain unauthorized access to targeted user accounts.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Login Replay Attack vulnerability. The application allows a remote attacker to intercept, delay, or fraudulently retransmit valid authentication data to achieve unauthorized access. To mitigate this risk, the application must implement a mechanism to include timestamps with every message, ensuring that messages exceeding a specific age threshold are automatically rejected by the recipient system.

First published (updated )
Severity
3.1
Infoleak
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Missing HTTP Strict-Transport-Security Header vulnerability. The application fails to implement the HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) policy within its responses, which could allow a remote attacker to downgrade the communication channel to an unencrypted connection (HTTP) and conduct man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks. To remediate this, the application must include the "Strict-Transport-Security" header in all web application responses.

First published (updated )
Severity
7.2
Infoleak
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Missing Secure Attribute in Encrypted Session (SSL) Cookie vulnerability. The application fails to set the "secure" attribute on session cookies generated during authentication, which could allow a remote attacker to intercept network traffic and capture sensitive cookies, session tokens, or credentials sent in cleartext over unencrypted channels.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
Infoleak
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Internal File Path Disclosure vulnerability. The application dashboard inadvertently leaks sensitive information regarding its internal file structure and directory paths through unhandled error messages, system logs, or debugging output, which could allow a remote attacker to map the underlying server environment and identify targets for further exploitation.

First published (updated )
Severity
4.6
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

HCL DevOps Loop is affected by an Unauthorized Access to Admin Functionality (Forced Browsing) vulnerability. Improper authorization checks may allow unauthorized users to access restricted administrative functionality by directly accessing protected application endpoints.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

HCL DevOps Loop is affected by missing HTTP security headers. Missing security headers may reduce browser protections against common web-based attacks such as clickjacking, MIME-type sniffing, and cross-site scripting.

First published (updated )
Severity
4.3
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

HCL DevOps Loop is affected by insufficient input validation that allows special characters where they should be restricted. This may result in unintended application behavior under certain conditions.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.4
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

HCL DevOps Loop is affected by a Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) misconfiguration. Improper CORS configuration may allow unauthorized cross-origin requests, potentially exposing application resources to untrusted domains.

First published (updated )
Severity
3.7
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

HCL IEM was affected with Strict transport security not enforced. It may enable attackers to perform SSL stripping or man-in-the-middle attacks and compromise secure communications.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
Infoleak
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

HCL IEM was affected with the Information disclosure nginx server. It may enable attackers to identify outdated software versions and target known vulnerabilities or publicly available exploits.

First published (updated )
Severity
4.3
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

HCL IEM was affected with the Anti Clickjacking XFrame Options Header Missing. It may allow attackers to embed the application in malicious pages and induce unauthorized user actions.

First published (updated )
Severity
4.2
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

HCL IEM was affected with X-Content-Type-Options Header Missing. It may enable attackers to perform SSL stripping or man-in-the-middle attacks and intercept sensitive data.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

HCL MyCloud was affected with Weak Password Policy. It may increase the risk of account compromise through brute-force or credential-based attacks.

First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203