HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to inject unvalidated, malformed data into the application, enabling potential injection attacks or errors in downstream processing systems.

BigFix Web Reports authorized users may perform HTML injection for the email administrative configuration page.

BigFix Web Reports authorized users may see SMTP credentials in clear text.

HCL MyXalytics product is affected by Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in the web application. This can allow the execution of unauthorized scripts, potentially resulting in unauthorized actions or access.

HCL MyXalytics is affected by the use of vulnerable/outdated versions which can expose the application to known security risks that could be exploited.

HCL MyXalytics: 6.6.  is affected by Mass Assignment vulnerability. Mass Assignment occurs when user input is automatically bound to application objects without proper validation or access controls, potentially allowing unauthorized modification of sensitive fields.

HCL MyXalytics v6.6 is affected by an HTML Injection. This issue occurs when untrusted input is included in the output without proper handling, potentially allowing unauthorized content injection and manipulation.

HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by SQL Injection flaw and a Cross-Tenant Data Exposure flaw vulnerabilities. which could allow an authenticated attacker to inject database commands to extract sensitive system details, as well as manipulate request values to gain unauthorized access to full personal profile data and PII across different organizations.

HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in its search functionality, which could allow an attacker to force the application server to send requests to internal systems that are not accessible from the internet.

HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a high-severity Broken Access Control vulnerability, which could allow a low-privileged user to gain unauthorized access to administrative screens and functions reserved for higher-privileged roles.

HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to inject unsanitized malicious scripts that execute in a victim's browser, enabling session hijacking, account takeover, and unauthorized actions on behalf of affected users.

Inline script execution allowed in CSP vulnerability has been identified in HCL AION v2.0

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in HCL AION This issue affects HCL AION: 2.0.

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in HCL AION.This issue affects AION: 2.0.

A Missing Secure Attribute in Encrypted Session (SSL) Cookie vulnerability in HCL AION.This issue affects AION: 2.0.

A vulnerability

Cacheable SSL Page Found vulnerability has been identified

in HCL AION.

Cached data may expose credentials, system identifiers, or internal file paths to attackers with access to the device or browser

This issue affects AION: 2.0.

A vulnerability  Bypass of the script allowlist configuration in HCL AION.

An incorrectly configured Content-Security-Policy header may allow unauthorized scripts to execute, increasing the risk of cross-site scripting and other injection-based attacks.This issue affects AION: 2.0.

A

rusted types in scripts not enforced in CSP vulnerability has been identified

in HCL AION.This issue affects AION: 2.0.

HCL Unica Centralized Offer Management is vulnerable to poor unhandled exceptions which exposes sensitive information. An attacker can exploit use this information to exploit known vulnerabilities launch targeted attacks, such as remote code execution or denial of service.

HCL Unica Centralized Offer Management is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR). An attacker can bypass authorization and access resources in the system directly, for example database records or files.

HCL Unica Centralized Offer Management is vulnerable to a potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An attacker can exploit improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server.

HCL Unica 12.1.10 can expose sensitive system information. An attacker could use this information to form an attack plan by leveraging known vulnerabilities in the application.

HCL Unica Platform is impacted by misconfigured Content Security Policy (CSP). These can result in malicious resources getting loaded and browsers may come across certain types of attacks, such as cross-site scripting and clickjacking.

HCL Unica Platform is affected by a Cookie without HTTPOnly Flag Set vulnerability. A malicious agent may be able to induce this event by feeding a user suitable links, either directly or via another web site.

HCL Unica Platform is impacted by misconfigured security related HTTP headers. This can lead to less secure browser default treatment for the policies controlled by these headers.

HCL Unica Platform is affected by unprotected files due to improper access controls.  These files may contain sensitive information such as private or system information that can be exploited by attackers to compromise the application, infrastructure, or users.

HCL BigFix Modern Client Management (MCM) 3.3 and earlier is affected by improper access control. Unauthorized users can access a small subset of endpoint actions, potentially allowing access to select internal functions.

HCL BigFix Mobile 3.3 and earlier is affected by improper access control. Unauthorized users can access a small subset of endpoint actions, potentially allowing access to select internal functions.

HCL BigFix Modern Client Management (MCM) 3.3 and earlier are vulnerable to certain insecure directives within the Content Security Policy (CSP). An attacker could trick users into performing actions by not properly restricting the sources of scripts and other content.

HCL BigFix Mobile 3.3 and earlier are vulnerable to certain insecure directives within the Content Security Policy (CSP). An attacker could trick users into performing actions by not properly restricting the sources of scripts and other content.