Where
AND
-Infinity
0

Vendor Risk Score

See how ibm compares to other vendors in security performance

View Risk Score →

Software

ibm engineering requirements management doors and doors web access
6
ibm data risk manager
5
ibm concert software
3
ibm langflow
3
ibm security verify governance
3
ibm storwize v3500
3
ibm storwize v3500 firmware
3
ibm storwize v5000
3
ibm storwize v5000 firmware
3
ibm storwize v7000
3
ibm storwize v7000 firmware
3
ibm watsonx.data intelligence
3
ibm api connect
2
ibm business automation workflow
2
ibm cloud pak for business automation
2
ibm cloud pak system
2
ibm cognos analytics
2
ibm ds8900f ( r9.4)
2
ibm ds8a00( r10.0 - r10.1 )
2
ibm flex system v7000
2
ibm flex system v7000 firmware
2
ibm infosphere guardium database activity monitoring
2
ibm iseries as/400
2
ibm os image for red hat linux systems
2
ibm pureapplication system
2
ibm qradar risk manager
2
ibm qradar security information and event manager
2
ibm qradar vulnerability manager
2
ibm san volume controller
2
ibm san volume controller firmware
2
ibm security access manager for mobile 8.0 firmware
2
ibm security access manager for web 7.0 firmware
2
ibm security access manager for web 8.0 firmware
2
ibm security guardium
2
ibm security verify access
2
ibm security verify governance -identity manager software component
2
ibm security verify governance -identity manager virtual appliance component
2
ibm security verify governance, identity manager software component
2
ibm security verify governance, identity manager virtual appliance component
2
ibm smartcloud entry appliance
2
ibm smartcloud provisioning
2
ibm software defined network for virtual environments
2
ibm starter kit for cloud
2
ibm stn6500
2
ibm stn6500 firmware
2
ibm stn6800
2
ibm stn6800 firmware
2
ibm stn7800
2
ibm stn7800 firmware
2
ibm storwize v3700
2
Severity
10
EPSS
0.04%
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

Apache Tomcat contains a path equivalence vulnerability that allows a remote attacker to execute code, disclose information, or inject malicious content via a partial PUT request. This vulnerability can be chained with CVE‑2026‑34486.

1 / 5
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
10
Buffer Overflow, Use After Free
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Apache ActiveMQ contains a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability that may allow a remote attacker with network access to a broker to run shell commands by manipulating serialized class types in the OpenWire protocol to cause the broker to instantiate any class on the classpath.

1 / 7
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Input Validation, Malicious File Upload
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Apache Struts Jakarta Multipart parser allows for malicious file upload using the Content-Type value, leading to remote code execution.

1 / 3
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
XEE
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Adobe Commerce and Magento Open Source contain an improper restriction of XML external entity reference (XXE) vulnerability that allows for remote code execution.

1 / 3
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Apache CouchDB contains an insecure default initialization of resource vulnerability which can allow an attacker to escalate to administrative privileges.

1 / 3
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IBM Aspera Faspex 4.4.2 Patch Level 1 and earlier could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by a YAML deserialization flaw. By sending a specially crafted obsolete API call, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the system. The obsolete API call was removed in Faspex 4.4.2 PL2. IBM X-Force ID: 243512.

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

A vulnerability identified in NetIQ Advance Authentication that leaks sensitive server information. This issue affects NetIQ Advance Authentication version before 6.3.5.1

1 / 4
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
EPSS
18.78%
Code Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to chain /api/v1/autologin (mints SUPERUSER tokens to any network caller) with /api/v1/validate/code (executes user code via exec()) to achieve full RCE on default Langflow deployments

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Code Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it.

1 / 4
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Buffer Overflow, Input Validation, Race Condition, Use After Free
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Airport. A permissions issue was addressed with improved redaction of sensitive information.

1 / 100
Source: Apple
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

Apache Tomcat could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by a file read/inclusion vulnerability in the AJP connector. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to read web application files from a vulnerable server and upload malicious JavaServer Pages (JSP) code within a variety of file types and execute arbitrary code on the system.

Note: This vulnerability is known as Ghostcat.

1 / 5
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Code Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in Apache Commons Text packages 1.5 through 1.9. The affected versions allow an attacker to benefit from a variable interpolation process contained in Apache Commons Text, which can cause properties to be dynamically defined. Server applications are vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) and unintentional contact with untrusted remote servers.

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Code Injection
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Serialized-object interfaces in certain IBM analytics, business solutions, cognitive, IT infrastructure, and mobile and social products allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the InvokerTransformer class in the Apache Commons Collections library.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
OS Command Injection
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in the bash functionality that evaluates specially formatted environment variables passed to it from another environment. An attacker could use this feature to override or bypass restrictions to the environment to execute shell commands before restrictions have been applied. Certain services and applications allow remote unauthenticated attackers to provide environment variables, allowing them to exploit this issue.

Acknowledgements:

Red Hat would like to thank Stephane Chazelas for reporting this issue.

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
OS Command Injection
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to write to files or possibly have unknown other impact via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the modcgi and modcgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-6271.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Input Validation, Malicious File Upload
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Apache ActiveMQ could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by an error in the Fileserver web application. By sending a specially crafted HTTP PUT request and an HTTP MOVE request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to create an arbitrary file and execute arbitrary code on the system.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Code Injection
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0.0 through 2.0.8 is vulnerable to a configuration overwrite that allows an unauthenticated user to login as "admin", and then execute code as root or SYSTEM via TM1 scripting. IBM X-Force ID: 172094.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

IBM Data Risk Manager contains a security bypass vulnerability that could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions when configured with SAML authentication. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass the authentication process and gain full administrative access to the system.

1 / 3
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
9.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

Summary

A serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data.

Attack surface

The core vulnerability was in dumps() and dumpd(): these functions failed to escape user-controlled dictionaries containing 'lc' keys. When this unescaped data was later deserialized via load() or loads(), the injected structures were treated as legitimate LangChain objects rather than plain user data.

This escaping bug enabled several attack vectors:

1. Injection via user data: Malicious LangChain object structures could be injected through user-controlled fields like metadata, additionalkwargs, or responsemetadata 2. Class instantiation within trusted namespaces: Injected manifests could instantiate any Serializable subclass, but only within the pre-approved trusted namespaces (langchaincore, langchain, langchaincommunity). This includes classes with side effects in init (network calls, file operations, etc.). Note that namespace validation was already enforced before this patch, so arbitrary classes outside these trusted namespaces could not be instantiated.

Security hardening

This patch fixes the escaping bug in dumps() and dumpd() and introduces new restrictive defaults in load() and loads(): allowlist enforcement via allowedobjects="core" (restricted to serialization mappings), secretsfromenv changed from True to False, and default Jinja2 template blocking via initvalidator. These are breaking changes for some use cases.

Who is affected?

Applications are vulnerable if they:

1. Use astreamevents(version="v1") — The v1 implementation internally uses vulnerable serialization. Note: astreamevents(version="v2") is not vulnerable. 2. Use Runnable.astreamlog() — This method internally uses vulnerable serialization for streaming outputs. 3. Call dumps() or dumpd() on untrusted data, then deserialize with load() or loads() — Trusting your own serialization output makes you vulnerable if user-controlled data (e.g., from LLM responses, metadata fields, or user inputs) contains 'lc' key structures. 4. Deserialize untrusted data with load() or loads() — Directly deserializing untrusted data that may contain injected 'lc' structures. 5. Use RunnableWithMessageHistory — Internal serialization in message history handling. 6. Use InMemoryVectorStore.load() to deserialize untrusted documents. 7. Load untrusted generations from cache using langchain-community caches. 8. Load untrusted manifests from the LangChain Hub via hub.pull. 9. Use StringRunEvaluatorChain on untrusted runs. 10. Use createlcstore or createkvdocstore with untrusted documents. 11. Use MultiVectorRetriever with byte stores containing untrusted documents. 12. Use LangSmithRunChatLoader with runs containing untrusted messages.

The most common attack vector is through LLM response fields like additionalkwargs or responsemetadata, which can be controlled via prompt injection and then serialized/deserialized in streaming operations.

Impact

Attackers who control serialized data can extract environment variable secrets by injecting {"lc": 1, "type": "secret", "id": ["ENVVAR"]} to load environment variables during deserialization (when secretsfromenv=True, which was the old default). They can also instantiate classes with controlled parameters by injecting constructor structures to instantiate any class within trusted namespaces with attacker-controlled parameters, potentially triggering side effects such as network calls or file operations.

Key severity factors:

- Affects the serialization path - applications trusting their own serialization output are vulnerable - Enables secret extraction when combined with secretsfromenv=True (the old default) - LLM responses in additionalkwargs can be controlled via prompt injection

Exploit example

python from langchaincore.load import dumps, load import os

Attacker injects secret structure into user-controlled data attackerdict = { "userdata": { "lc": 1, "type": "secret", "id": ["OPENAIAPIKEY"] } }

serialized = dumps(attackerdict) # Bug: does NOT escape the 'lc' key

os.environ["OPENAIAPIKEY"] = "sk-secret-key-12345" deserialized = load(serialized, secretsfromenv=True)

print(deserialized["userdata"]) # "sk-secret-key-12345" - SECRET LEAKED!

Security hardening changes (breaking changes)

This patch introduces three breaking changes to load() and loads():

1. New allowedobjects parameter (defaults to 'core'): Enforces allowlist of classes that can be deserialized. The 'all' option corresponds to the list of objects specified in mappings.py while the 'core' option limits to objects within langchaincore. We recommend that users explicitly specify which objects they want to allow for serialization/deserialization. 2. secretsfromenv default changed from True to False: Disables automatic secret loading from environment 3. New initvalidator parameter (defaults to defaultinitvalidator): Blocks Jinja2 templates by default

Migration guide

No changes needed for most users

If you're deserializing standard LangChain types (messages, documents, prompts, trusted partner integrations like ChatOpenAI, ChatAnthropic, etc.), your code will work without changes:

python from langchaincore.load import load

Uses default allowlist from serialization mappings obj = load(serializeddata)

For custom classes

If you're deserializing custom classes not in the serialization mappings, add them to the allowlist:

python from langchaincore.load import load from mypackage import MyCustomClass

Specify the classes you need obj = load(serializeddata, allowedobjects=[MyCustomClass])

For Jinja2 templates

Jinja2 templates are now blocked by default because they can execute arbitrary code. If you need Jinja2 templates, pass initvalidator=None:

python from langchaincore.load import load from langchaincore.prompts import PromptTemplate

obj = load( serializeddata, allowedobjects=[PromptTemplate], initvalidator=None )

[!WARNING] Only disable initvalidator if you trust the serialized data. Jinja2 templates can execute arbitrary Python code.

For secrets from environment

secretsfromenv now defaults to False. If you need to load secrets from environment variables:

python from langchaincore.load import load

obj = load(serializeddata, secretsfromenv=True)

Credits

Dumps bug was reported by @yardenporat Changes for security hardening due to findings from @0xn3va and @VladimirEliTokarev

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
9.1
OS Command Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

IBM Data Risk Manager contains an unspecified vulnerability which could allow a remote, authenticated attacker to execute commands on the system.�

1 / 3
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
9.1
Command Injection
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Apache HTTP Server contains an improper escaping of output vulnerability in modrewrite that allows an attacker to map URLs to filesystem locations that are permitted to be served by the server but are not intentionally/directly reachable by any URL, resulting in code execution or source code disclosure.

1 / 6
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
9.1
SQL Injection
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

An issue was discovered in 5.1 before 5.1.14, 4.2 before 4.2.26, and 5.2 before 5.2.8. The methods QuerySet.filter(), QuerySet.exclude(), and QuerySet.get(), and the class Q(), are subject to SQL injection when using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the connector argument. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank cyberstan for reporting this issue.

First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Use After Free
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A use after free issue was addressed with improved memory management.

1 / 5
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
EPSS
0.04%
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact If pdf.js is used to load a malicious PDF, and PDF.js is configured with isEvalSupported set to true (which is the default value), unrestricted attacker-controlled JavaScript will be executed in the context of the hosting domain.

Patches The patch removes the use of eval: https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/pull/18015

Workarounds Set the option isEvalSupported to false.

References https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showbug.cgi?id=1893645

1 / 6
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Use After Free, Input Validation, Race Condition
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Admin Framework. A logic issue was addressed with improved checks.

1 / 82
Source: Apple
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Input Validation, Code Injection, OS Command Injection
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Apache ActiveMQ contains an improper input validation vulnerability that allows for code injection.

1 / 3
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

1 / 7
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
8.6
EPSS
0.02%
Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L

Summary

A Path Traversal vulnerability exists when using non-default configuration options UPLOADDIR and UPLOADKEEPFILENAME=True. An attacker can write uploaded files to arbitrary locations on the filesystem by crafting a malicious filename.

Details

When UPLOADDIR is set and UPLOADKEEPFILENAME is True, the library constructs the file path using os.path.join(filedir, fname). Due to the behavior of os.path.join(), if the filename begins with a /, all preceding path components are discarded:

py os.path.join("/upload/dir", "/etc/malicious") == "/etc/malicious" This allows an attacker to bypass the intended upload directory and write files to arbitrary paths. Affected Configuration Projects are only affected if all of the following are true: - UPLOADDIR is set - UPLOADKEEPFILENAME is set to True - The uploaded file exceeds MAXMEMORYFILESIZE (triggering a flush to disk)

The default configuration is not vulnerable. Impact Arbitrary file write to attacker-controlled paths on the filesystem. Mitigation Upgrade to version 0.0.22, or avoid using UPLOADKEEPFILENAME=True in project configurations.

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
8.4
Integer Underflow, Buffer Overflow, Path Traversal, Integer Overflow
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A heap-based buffer overflow flaw was found in the way the legacyparseparam function in the Filesystem Context functionality of the Linux kernel verified the supplied parameters length. An unprivileged (in case of unprivileged user namespaces enabled, otherwise needs namespaced CAPSYSADMIN privilege) local user able to open a filesystem that does not support the Filesystem Context API (and thus fallbacks to legacy handling) could use this flaw to escalate their privileges on the system.

1 / 5
First published (updated )
Severity
8.3
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was discovered in processing setsockopt IPTSOSETREPLACE (or IP6TSOSETREPLACE) for 32 bit processes on 64 bit systems. This flaw will allow local user to gain privileges or cause a DoS through user name space. This action is usually restricted to root-privileged users but can also be leveraged if the kernel is compiled with CONFIGUSERNS and CONFIGNETNS and the user is granted elevated privileges.

1 / 5
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203