See how lexmark compares to other vendors in security performance
cgi-bin/postpf/cgi-bin/dynamic/config/config.html on Lexmark X94x before LC.BR.P142, X85x through LC4.BE.P487, X644 and X646 before LC2.MC.P374, X642 through LC2.MB.P318, W840 through LS.HA.P252, T64x before LS.ST.P344, X64xef through LC2.TI.P325, C935dn through LC.JO.P091, C920 through LS.TA.P152, C78x through LC.IO.P187, X78x through LC2.IO.P335, C77x through LC.CM.P052, X772 through LC2.TR.P291, C53x through LS.SW.P069, C52x through LS.FA.P150, 25xxN through LCL.CU.P114, N4000 through LC.MD.P119, N4050e through GO.GO.N206, N70xxe through LC.CO.N309, E450 through LM.SZ.P124, E350 through LE.PH.P129, and E250 through LE.PM.P126 printers allows remote attackers to remove the Password Protect administrative password via the vac.255.GENPASSWORD parameter.
Race condition in the initialization process on Lexmark printers with firmware ATL before ATL.02.049, CB before CB.02.049, PP before PP.02.049, and YK before YK.02.049 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by leveraging incorrect detection of the security-jumper status.
The initial admin account setup wizard on Lexmark devices allow unauthenticated access to the “out of service erase” feature.
Embedded web server command injection vulnerability in Lexmark devices through 2021-12-07.
Directory traversal vulnerability in the GfdFileUploadServerlet servlet in Lexmark MarkVision Enterprise before 2.1 allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.
Various Lexmark products have a Buffer Overflow (issue 2 of 3).
Buffer overflow vulnerability has been identified in Lexmark devices through 2021-12-07 in postscript interpreter.
Lexmark Markvision Enterprise (MVE) before 2.4.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands by uploading files. (
Various Lexmark products have a Buffer Overflow (issue 3 of 3).
Various Lexmark products have an Integer Overflow.
Embedded web server input sanitization vulnerability in Lexmark devices through 2021-12-07, which can which can lead to remote code execution on the device.
Certain Lexmark devices through 2023-02-19 mishandle Input Validation (issue 2 of 4).
Various Lexmark devices have a Buffer Overflow (issue 1 of 2).
Various Lexmark devices have a Buffer Overflow (issue 2 of 2).
An exploitable out-of-bounds write exists in the Bzip2 parsing of the Lexmark Perspective Document Filters conversion functionality. A crafted Bzip2 document can lead to a stack-based buffer overflow causing an out-of-bounds write which under the right circumstance could potentially be leveraged by an attacker to gain arbitrary code execution.
Lexmark Scan To Network (SNF) 3.2.9 and earlier stores network configuration credentials in plaintext and transmits them in requests, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via requests to (1) cgi-bin/direct/printer/prtappauth/apps/snfDestServlet or (2) cgi-bin/direct/printer/prtappauth/apps/ImportExportServlet.
In certain Lexmark products through 2023-01-12, SSRF can occur because of a lack of input validation.
Certain Lexmark devices through 2023-02-19 have an Integer Overflow.
Certain Lexmark devices through 2023-02-19 have Improper Validation of an Array Index.
Certain Lexmark devices through 2023-02-19 mishandle Input Validation (issue 4 of 4).
Certain Lexmark devices through 2023-02-19 have an Out-of-bounds Write.
Certain Lexmark devices through 2023-02-19 mishandle Input Validation (issue 3 of 4).
Certain Lexmark devices through 2023-02-19 access a Resource By Using an Incompatible Type.
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to remove authentication on affected installations of Lexmark MC3224i printers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within URL handling. The issue results from the lack of proper restriction to a URL. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root.
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to remove authentication on affected installations of Lexmark MC3224i printers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within URL handling. The issue results from the lack of proper restriction to a URL. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root.
A Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision vulnerability has been identified in the Lexmark Print Management Client.
An untrusted search path vulnerability has been identified in the Embedded Solutions Framework in various Lexmark devices. This vulnerability can be leveraged by an attacker to execute arbitrary code.
Lexmark Markvision Enterprise before 1.8 provides a diagnostic interface on TCP port 9789, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, change the configuration, or obtain sensitive fleet-management information via unspecified vectors.
The SE menu contains information used by Lexmark to diagnose device errors. A vulnerability in one of the SE menu routines can be leveraged by an attacker to execute arbitrary code.
Lexmark MX6500 LW75.JD.P296 and previous devices have Incorrect Access Control via the access control settings.