See how linbit compares to other vendors in security performance
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drbd: add missing krefget in handlewriteconflicts
With two-primaries enabled, DRBD tries to detect "concurrent" writes and handle write conflicts, so that even if you write to the same sector simultaneously on both nodes, they end up with the identical data once the writes are completed.
In handling "superseeded" writes, we forgot a krefget, resulting in a premature drbddestroydevice and use after free, and further to kernel crashes with symptoms.
Relevance: No one should use DRBD as a random data generator, and apparently all users of "two-primaries" handle concurrent writes correctly on layer up. That is cluster file systems use some distributed lock manager, and live migration in virtualization environments stops writes on one node before starting writes on the other node.
Which means that other than for "test cases", this code path is never taken in real life.
FYI, in DRBD 9, things are handled differently nowadays. We still detect "write conflicts", but no longer try to be smart about them. We decided to disconnect hard instead: upper layers must not submit concurrent writes. If they do, that's their fault.
An issue was discovered in LINBIT csync2 through 2.0. It does not correctly check for the return value GNUTLSEWARNINGALERTRECEIVED of the gnutlshandshake() function. It neglects to call this function again, as required by the design of the API.
An issue was discovered in LINBIT csync2 through 2.0. csyncdaemonsession in daemon.c neglects to force a failure of a hello command when the configuration requires use of SSL.
drbd8 allows local users to bypass intended restrictions for certain actions via netlink packets, similar to CVE-2009-3725.