Where
-Infinity
0
Severity
8.2
Infoleak
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

The LiteSpeed Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthenticated disclosure of sensitive WooCommerce customer data in all versions up to, and including, 7.9.1 With Cache REST enabled (the shipped default cache-rest=1), LiteSpeed stores WooCommerce Store API GET responses (/wc/store/v1/cart and /wc/store/v1/checkout) as PUBLIC cache objects and does not vary the cache on the Cart-Token or WooCommerce session. A shopper's personalized cart/checkout response is therefore served to any later, cookie-less and token-less client as an LSCache HIT. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to read another shopper's billing and shipping details (name, company, street address, email, phone), cart contents and totals, and the shopper's live Cart-Token session JWT and nonce (enabling cart/checkout-session hijack), plus orderkey on the checkout endpoint.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.4
XSS
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

The LiteSpeed Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'comment' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 7.9.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability is only exploitable when the HTML Minify option (OOPTMHTMLMIN) is enabled and a companion plugin renders stored comment content into a raw-text context such as a JSON-LD script block on the same page.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.4
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

The LiteSpeed Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'bbpreplycontent' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 7.9.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Exploitation requires that an administrator has enabled Viewport Images (VPI) and configured a VPI filename that matches an image the attacker can embed in user-generated content — such as a bbPress topic where Subscriber-level Participants are permitted to post replies containing raw img tags.

First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
XSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

The LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin before 7.9.2 does not restrict one of its HTML rewriting routines to stylesheet content, so it removes a quote that terminates an attribute in the rendered page, and combined with unescaped comment author output this allows unauthenticated users whose comment is published to inject attributes that execute JavaScript in the browser of any visitor, including a logged-in administrator, who views front-end pages while the affected option is enabled.

First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
XSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

The LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin before 7.9.2 does not limit one of its HTML optimization routines to stylesheet content, so it can delete the markup that closes an attribute in the rendered page, and combined with unescaped comment author output this allows unauthenticated users whose comments are published to inject event-handler attributes that run JavaScript in the browser of any visitor, including a logged-in administrator, viewing front-end pages while the optimization is enabled.

First published (updated )
Severity
3.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

The LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin before 7.9.2 does not perform a capability check on its admin-notice dismissal handler, and the nonce it relies on is not bound to the specific notice being dismissed, so on sites in certain configurations a low-privileged authenticated user (Subscriber) can dismiss administrative notices the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin before 7.9.2 marks as non-dismissible, including a warning that sensitive files may be publicly accessible.

First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

In lsquic before 4.9.0, the HTTP/3 implementation can use an excessive amount of memory because the number of buffered header sets is not limited, as demonstrated by a QPACK amplification attack. This is related to headeroutdynamicentry and esmaxheaderlistsize.

First published (updated )

https://foxio.io/blog/header-accordions-qpack-amplification-attacks-against-http-3-servers reports: A remote, unauthenticated client can force an HTTP/3 server to allocate tens to thousands of times more memory than it sends. One connection is enough to OOM or pin a default-configured server. Seven of the ten implementations tested are vulnerable; several are already fixed.

QPACK compresses HTTP/3 headers to minimize traffic sent over the wire. Across the affected implementations, decoded-header limits are missing, incomplete, or applied too late. A small HEADERS frame can therefore expand into hundreds of thousands of header objects in memory. Preventing that expansion from exhausting resources requires enforcing a cumulative budget as fields are decoded and retained.

Patched as of October 20, 2026 ==============================

Library Fixed version Advisory ------- ------------- -------- quic-go 0.57.0 CVE-2025-64702

Cloudflare quiche 0.29.3 CVE-2026-12523

lsquic 4.9.0 no CVE

Wireshark 4.6.2 / 4.4.12 CVE-2025-13945

Unpatched as of October 20, 2026 ================================

Library ------- Bun 1.4.3

h3 (hyperium)

aioquic / mitmproxy

Mitigations ===========

Bun: Don't expose HTTP/3 servers

mitmproxy: disable HTTP/3 (pass --set http3=false)

h3 crate: set a reasonable maxfieldsectionsize

Not affected: IIS, Envoy, ngtcp2/nghttp3 https://foxio.io/blog/header-accordions-qpack-amplification-attacks-against-http-3-servers goes into much more detail after providing that summary.

-- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith () oracle com Oracle Solaris Engineering - https://blogs.oracle.com/solaris

Severity
9.4
AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) before 6.3.7 build 1 mishandles internal redirect URL validation in a certain "corner case" of %252e%252e double decoding, letting a low-privileged tenant execute code in the context of a different account.

First published (updated )
Severity
8.5
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

LiteSpeed cPanel plugin before 2.4.8 (as distributed in LiteSpeed WHM PlugIn before 5.3.2.0) mishandles symlinks provided by a user with FTP or web shell access on a shared hosting server running CloudLinux/CageFS, as exploited in the wild in May 2026.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )

Hello all! With the crazy explosion of vulnerabilities being disclosed lately, I thought it might be helpful to have a weekly post about the top CVE's from the week before. Mods, let me know if this breaks any rules or if it should be posted differently. My intention is just community building and trying to help others out that are in the same situation as our team.

Four vulns stood out to me from the past week. All of them are on CISA's KEV list, which means there is evidence of active exploitation. The two internet-facing ones should be prioritized first is applicable.

1. CVE-2026-0257, Palo Alto PAN-OS GlobalProtect auth bypass

If you have GlobalProtect exposed, this is not one to let sit too long. Attackers are able to forge GlobalProtect session cookies and connect to the VPN without valid credentials.

Affected: PAN-OS firewalls with the GlobalProtect portal or gateway enabled.

Why it matters: The CVSS score is only 4.0, which looks “medium” on paper, but that score feels misleading here. It is KEV-listed, exploited in the wild, unauthenticated, and sitting on an internet-facing VPN service.

Action: upgrade to a fixed PAN-OS release now, or disable the auth-override feature as an interim step. Also review GlobalProtect logs for sessions you cannot account for.

2. CVE-2026-35616: Fortinet FortiClient EMS pre-auth API bypass

This one is nasty because of what EMS manages.

It is a pre-auth bypass that can let an attacker push scripts to managed endpoints. Arctic Wolf reported exploitation in May, including EKZ infostealer activity disguised as a Fortinet update.

Affected: FortiClient EMS 7.4.5 through 7.4.6.

Why it matters: EMS has a bunch of downstream control. If someone can abuse it, the impact can quickly move from just “one exposed management service” to “many managed endpoints.”

Action: Confirm your EMS version and apply the hotfix. I’d also review managed-endpoint policies and Remote Access Profiles for anything you did not create recently.

3. CVE-2026-48172: LiteSpeed cPanel plugin privilege escalation to root

This one mainly matters for web hosts, MSPs, and anyone running cPanel with LiteSpeed.

Any authenticated cPanel user can run scripts as root through the plugin’s Redis JSON API. It was reportedly exploited as a zero-day before the fix shipped.

Affected: LiteSpeed user-end cPanel plugin versions 2.3 through 2.4.4.

Why it matters: CVSS 9.8. Added to KEV on May 26, with the federal remediation deadline already passed on May 29.

Action: Update the plugin to 2.4.5 or later. IOC to check in the cPanel logs:

cpaneljsonapifunc=redisAble

4. CVE-2026-34926: Trend Micro Apex One on-prem directory traversal

This is not really a front-door bug, but it is still worth attention because of the blast radius.

An attacker with admin access to the Apex One server can inject code into the agent update channel and push it to managed endpoints.

Affected: On-premise Trend Micro Apex One. The SaaS version is not impacted.

Why it matters: KEV-listed and exploited in the wild. Federal deadline is June 4. The caveat is that it obviously already requires prior admin access to the server, so treat it as an escalation/lateral-movement risk.

Action: Apply Trend Micro’s fix. If you cannot patch immediately, restrict who and what can reach the Apex One management server.

Not every KEV entry deserves a full on fire drill, but the Palo Alto and Fortinet items seem like the ones I would want handled first if they were in my environment.

Let me know if this format is helpful at all and I'll do another one next week if it's worthwhile to the community!

First published (updated )
Social
reddit
Severity
7.2
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

The LiteSpeed Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the /wp-json/litespeed/v1/notifyccss and /wp-json/litespeed/v1/notifyucss REST API endpoints in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. These endpoints accept CSS content from QUIC.cloud callback notifications and store it to disk without sanitization. The stored content is later rendered inline frontend page loads without output escaping. The access control protecting these endpoints is IP-based validation that can potentially be bypassed when the WordPress site is deployed behind a reverse proxy, load balancer, or CDN with certain configurations. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers, under certain conditions, to inject arbitrary JavaScript into CCSS/UCSS content.

First published (updated )
Severity
10
AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

LiteSpeed cPanel Plugin contains privilege escalation vulnerability that is exposed via the user-end cPanel plugin, which can be abused by any cPanel user account to execute arbitrary scripts with root privileges.

1 / 2
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
OS Command Injection, Path Traversal, Command Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

LiteSpeed Web Server Enterprise 5.4.11 contains an authenticated command injection vulnerability in the external app configuration interface. Authenticated administrators can inject shell commands through the 'Command' parameter in the server configuration, allowing remote code execution via path traversal and bash command injection.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

The LiteSpeed Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via URLs in all versions up to, and including, 7.5.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

LiteSpeed QUIC (LSQUIC) Library before 4.3.1 has an lsquicenginepacketin memory leak.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
EPSS
0.04%
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A hash collision vulnerability (in the hash table used to manage connections) in LSQUIC (aka LiteSpeed QUIC) before 4.2.0 allows remote attackers to cause a considerable CPU load on the server (a Hash DoS attack) by initiating connections with colliding Source Connection IDs (SCIDs). This is caused by XXH32 usage.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.5
EPSS
0.04%
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

The LiteSpeed Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via plugin debug settings in all versions up to, and including, 6.4.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfilteredhtml has been disabled.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

OpenLiteSpeed before 1.8.1 mishandles chunked encoding.

First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203