Where
AND
-Infinity
0

Vendor Risk Score

See how microsoft compares to other vendors in security performance

View Risk Score →

Software

microsoft windows 10
114
microsoft windows server 2019
109
microsoft windows server 2022
106
microsoft windows server 2016
104
microsoft windows 11
103
microsoft windows
96
microsoft windows 10 21h2
91
microsoft windows 10 1809
90
microsoft windows 10 22h2
87
microsoft windows 10 1607
84
microsoft windows server 2012
83
microsoft windows server 2012 r2
82
microsoft windows server 2022, 23h2 edition
78
microsoft windows 11 22h2
77
microsoft windows 11 23h2
77
microsoft windows server 2022 23h2
77
microsoft windows 10 1507
69
microsoft windows 11 24h2
65
microsoft windows server 2008
63
microsoft windows server 2025
62
microsoft windows server 2008 r2
56
microsoft windows 11 21h2
41
microsoft office
32
microsoft windows server
30
microsoft windows operating system
22
microsoft windows 7
21
microsoft 365 apps
20
microsoft office long term servicing channel
20
microsoft windows 8.1
19
microsoft windows 11 25h2
17
microsoft windows rt 8.1
17
microsoft exchange server
16
microsoft 365 apps for enterprise
15
microsoft office ltsc 2021 for 32-bit editions
14
microsoft office ltsc 2021 for 64-bit editions
14
microsoft edge
13
microsoft office 2019 for 32-bit editions
12
microsoft office 2019 for 64-bit editions
12
microsoft office ltsc 2024 for 32-bit editions
11
microsoft office ltsc 2024 for 64-bit editions
11
microsoft windows 10 20h2
11
microsoft exchange
10
microsoft exchange server 2016
10
microsoft exchange server 2019
10
microsoft sharepoint server
10
microsoft exchange server 2013
9
microsoft outlook
9
microsoft edge (chromium-based)
8
microsoft sharepoint enterprise server 2016
8
microsoft sharepoint server 2019
8
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N/E:H/RL:O/RC:C

Microsoft Office Outlook contains a missing user interaction for potentially unsafe action vulnerability that allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

1 / 3
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
Race Condition
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

crypto: afalg - Disallow concurrent writes in afalgsendmsg

1 / 5
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H/E:P/RL:O/RC:C

.NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

HTTP/2 Rapid reset attack The HTTP/2 protocol allows clients to indicate to the server that a previous stream should be canceled by sending a RSTSTREAM frame. The protocol does not require the client and server to coordinate the cancellation in any way, the client may do it unilaterally. The client may also assume that the cancellation will take effect immediately when the server receives the RSTSTREAM frame, before any other data from that TCP connection is processed.

Abuse of this feature is called a Rapid Reset attack because it relies on the ability for an endpoint to send a RSTSTREAM frame immediately after sending a request frame, which makes the other endpoint start working and then rapidly resets the request. The request is canceled, but leaves the HTTP/2 connection open.

The HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack built on this capability is simple: The client opens a large number of streams at once as in the standard HTTP/2 attack, but rather than waiting for a response to each request stream from the server or proxy, the client cancels each request immediately.

The ability to reset streams immediately allows each connection to have an indefinite number of requests in flight. By explicitly canceling the requests, the attacker never exceeds the limit on the number of concurrent open streams. The number of in-flight requests is no longer dependent on the round-trip time (RTT), but only on the available network bandwidth.

In a typical HTTP/2 server implementation, the server will still have to do significant amounts of work for canceled requests, such as allocating new stream data structures, parsing the query and doing header decompression, and mapping the URL to a resource. For reverse proxy implementations, the request may be proxied to the backend server before the RSTSTREAM frame is processed. The client on the other hand paid almost no costs for sending the requests. This creates an exploitable cost asymmetry between the server and the client.

Multiple software artifacts implementing HTTP/2 are affected. This advisory was originally ingested from the swift-nio-http2 repo advisory and their original conent follows.

swift-nio-http2 specific advisory swift-nio-http2 is vulnerable to a denial-of-service vulnerability in which a malicious client can create and then reset a large number of HTTP/2 streams in a short period of time. This causes swift-nio-http2 to commit to a large amount of expensive work which it then throws away, including creating entirely new Channels to serve the traffic. This can easily overwhelm an EventLoop and prevent it from making forward progress.

swift-nio-http2 1.28 contains a remediation for this issue that applies reset counter using a sliding window. This constrains the number of stream resets that may occur in a given window of time. Clients violating this limit will have their connections torn down. This allows clients to continue to cancel streams for legitimate reasons, while constraining malicious actors.

1 / 10
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
9.3
EPSS
0.75%
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A supply chain attack compromised the official installation packages of DAEMON Tools Lite (Windows versions 12.5.0.2421 through 12.5.0.2434), distributed from the legitimate website daemon-tools.cc between approximately April 8, 2026, and May 5, 2026. Attackers gained unauthorized access to the vendor's (AVB Disc Soft) build or distribution infrastructure and trojanized three binaries: DTHelper.exe, DiscSoftBusServiceLite.exe, and DTShellHlp.exe. These files were digitally signed with the legitimate AVB Disc Soft code-signing certificate, allowing the malicious installers to appear trustworthy and bypass signature-based detection.

1 / 2
Source: NVD
First published (updated )
Severity
5.5
Buffer Overflow
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

HID: core: zero-initialize the report buffer

1 / 8
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
8.1
EPSS
4.11%
Integer Overflow
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C/CR:H/IR:H/AR:H/MAV:N/MAC:L/MPR:N/MUI:N/MS:U/MC:H/MI:H/MA:H

An out of bounds write exists in FreeType versions 2.13.0 and below (newer versions of FreeType are not vulnerable) when attempting to parse font subglyph structures related to TrueType GX and variable font files. The vulnerable code assigns a signed short value to an unsigned long and then adds a static value causing it to wrap around and allocate too small of a heap buffer. The code then writes up to 6 signed long integers out of bounds relative to this buffer. This may result in arbitrary code execution. This vulnerability may have been exploited in the wild.

1 / 6
Source: Debian
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Buffer Overflow, Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Chromium: CVE-2023-4863 Heap buffer overflow in WebP

1 / 9
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Buffer Overflow, Path Traversal, Race Condition
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

A flaw was found in rsync which could be triggered when rsync compares file checksums. This flaw allows an attacker to manipulate the checksum length (s2length) to cause a comparison between a checksum and uninitialized memory and leak one byte of uninitialized stack data at a time.

1 / 10
Source: OSV
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Buffer Overflow, Path Traversal, Race Condition
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

A flaw was found in rsync which could be triggered when rsync compares file checksums. This flaw allows an attacker to manipulate the checksum length (s2length) to cause a comparison between a checksum and uninitialized memory and leak one byte of uninitialized stack data at a time.

1 / 10
Source: NVD
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Buffer Overflow, Path Traversal, Race Condition
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

A flaw was found in rsync which could be triggered when rsync compares file checksums. This flaw allows an attacker to manipulate the checksum length (s2length) to cause a comparison between a checksum and uninitialized memory and leak one byte of uninitialized stack data at a time.

1 / 10
Source: OSV
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Buffer Overflow, Path Traversal, Race Condition
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

A flaw was found in rsync which could be triggered when rsync compares file checksums. This flaw allows an attacker to manipulate the checksum length (s2length) to cause a comparison between a checksum and uninitialized memory and leak one byte of uninitialized stack data at a time.

1 / 10
Source: OSV
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Buffer Overflow, Path Traversal, Race Condition
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in rsync which could be triggered when rsync compares file checksums. This flaw allows an attacker to manipulate the checksum length (s2length) to cause a comparison between a checksum and uninitialized memory and leak one byte of uninitialized stack data at a time.

1 / 10
Source: OSV
First published (updated )
Severity
9.1
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Microsoft SharePoint contains a weak authentication vulnerability which allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

1 / 3
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

1 / 3
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

1 / 3
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C

Active Directory Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

1 / 3
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N/E:F/RL:O/RC:C

Microsoft SharePoint contains a missing authentication for critical function vulnerability that allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

1 / 3
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
7
Use After Free
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Microsoft Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock contains a use-after-free vulnerability that allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

1 / 3
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
10
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Entra ID allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

1 / 3
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Improper link resolution before file access ('link following') in Windows Update Stack allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

1 / 3
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
Buffer Overflow
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows ALPC allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

1 / 3
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Command Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C

Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Windows Shell allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

1 / 3
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
Buffer Overflow
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A buffer overflow was discovered in the GNU C Library's dynamic loader ld.so while processing the GLIBCTUNABLES environment variable. This issue could allow a local attacker to use maliciously crafted GLIBCTUNABLES environment variables when launching binaries with SUID permission to execute code with elevated privileges.

1 / 6
First published (updated )
Severity
8.1
EPSS
71.47%
Race Condition, Input Validation, Integer Overflow, Buffer Overflow
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A security regression (CVE-2006-5051) was discovered in OpenSSH's server (sshd). There is a race condition which can lead sshd to handle some signals in an unsafe manner. An unauthenticated, remote attacker may be able to trigger it by failing to authenticate within a set time period.

1 / 36
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
5.6
Race Condition, Buffer Overflow, Path Traversal
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

A flaw was found in rsync. This vulnerability arises from a race condition during rsync's handling of symbolic links. Rsync's default behavior when encountering symbolic links is to skip them. If an attacker replaced a regular file with a symbolic link at the right time, it was possible to bypass the default behavior and traverse symbolic links. Depending on the privileges of the rsync process, an attacker could leak sensitive information, potentially leading to privilege escalation.

1 / 6
Source: Debian
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
EPSS
23.44%
Input Validation, Double Free, Use After Free
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A flaw was found in the OpenSSH package. For each ping packet the SSH server receives, a pong packet is allocated in a memory buffer and stored in a queue of packages. It is only freed when the server/client key exchange has finished. A malicious client may keep sending such packages, leading to an uncontrolled increase in memory consumption on the server side. Consequently, the server may become unavailable, resulting in a denial of service attack.

1 / 36
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
6.8
EPSS
10.06%
Input Validation, Double Free, Use After Free
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

A vulnerability was found in OpenSSH when the VerifyHostKeyDNS option is enabled. A machine-in-the-middle attack can be performed by a malicious machine impersonating a legit server. This issue occurs due to how OpenSSH mishandles error codes in specific conditions when verifying the host key. For an attack to be considered successful, the attacker needs to manage to exhaust the client's memory resource first, turning the attack complexity high.

1 / 35
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
Buffer Overflow, Integer Overflow
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in grub2. When reading data from a squash4 filesystem, grub's squash4 fs module uses user-controlled parameters from the filesystem geometry to determine the internal buffer size, however, it improperly checks for integer overflows. A maliciously crafted filesystem may lead some of those buffer size calculations to overflow, causing it to perform a grubmalloc() operation with a smaller size than expected. As a result, the directread() will perform a heap based out-of-bounds write during data reading. This flaw may be leveraged to corrupt grub's internal critical data and may result in arbitrary code execution, by-passing secure boot protections.

1 / 3
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
8.1
SQL Injection
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Improper neutralization of quoting syntax in PostgreSQL libpq functions PQescapeLiteral(), PQescapeIdentifier(), PQescapeString(), and PQescapeStringConn() allows a database input provider to achieve SQL injection in certain usage patterns. Specifically, SQL injection requires the application to use the function result to construct input to psql, the PostgreSQL interactive terminal. Similarly, improper neutralization of quoting syntax in PostgreSQL command line utility programs allows a source of command line arguments to achieve SQL injection when clientencoding is BIG5 and serverencoding is one of EUCTW or MULEINTERNAL. Versions before PostgreSQL 17.3, 16.7, 15.11, 14.16, and 13.19 are affected.

1 / 5
Source: NVD
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203